Skip to main content

Depth without disparity in random-dot stereograms

Abstract

Depth can be perceived in random-dot stereograms in which dots are binocularly uncorrelated, in the absence of overall positional disparity (e.g., Julesz, 1960). This phenomenon, which we have calledrivaldepth, persists over a wide range of luminances, stereogram dot densities, and dot sizes. Rivaldepth is also observed with interocular uncorrelation provided by complementation and orthogonal rival contours, and in both static and dynamic random-dot stereograms. Like conventional stereopsis, rivaldepth magnitude grows with increasing viewing distance, but unlike conventional stereopsis its direction does not reverse when half-images are interchanged. In a survey of 52 individuals, about half consistently reported far rivaldepth; they were also more likely to exhibit overconvergence on a test of fixation disparity. The remaining subjects reported near rivaldepth and tended to show underconvergences. A second experiment, however, showed that eye movements measured immediately after offset of rivaldepth stereograms were in the opposite direction (e.g., convergences were associated with near depth). Evidently, once rivaldepth is established, subjects attempt to fuse the “object” projecting the uncorrelated images. Rivaldepth magnitude is similar to depth produced by stereograms with disparities too large to be fused. The pattern of eye movements and rivaldepth magnitude suggest that the binocular visual system treats uncorrelation as a potentially correlated disparity beyond the fusion limit.

References

  • Boman, D. K., &Kertesz, A. E. (1985). Effect of stimulus parameters on fusional and stereoscopic performance.American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics,62, 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, T. S. (1985). Extrapolating and interpolating surfaces in depth.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences,224, 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisby, J. P., &Mayhew, J. E. W. (1978). The relationship between apparent depth and disparity in rivalrous-texture stereograms.Perception,7, 661–678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frisby, J. P., &Mayhew, J. E. W. (1979). Depth inversion in randomdot stereograms.Perception,8, 397–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, F., Krause, F., &Poggio, G. F. (1986). Sensitivity of cortical visual neurons to binocular correlation of dynamic randomdot stereo patterns.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,27(Suppl.), 244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H. L. F. Von (1962).Treatise on physiological optics (J. P. C. Southall, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1909)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, J. (1964). Contralateral suppressive fields of binocular combination.Psychonomic Science,1, 157–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, I. E., &Braddick, O. J. (1985). Depth perception of uncorrected areas in random-dot stereograms.Perception,14, A25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz, B. (1960). Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns.Bell System Technical journal,29, 1125–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz, B. (1964). Binocular depth perception without familiarity cues.Science,145, 356–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Julesz, B. (1971).Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz, B., &Chang, J. (1976). Interaction between pools of binocular disparity detectors tuned to different disparities.Biological Cybernetics,22, 107–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Julesz, B., &Tyler, C. W. (1976). Neurontropy, an entropy-like measure of neural correlation in binocular fusion and rivalry.Biological Cybernetics,23, 25–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, L. (1974).Sight and mind: An introduction to visual perception. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, M. (1978). Stereopsis without binocular correlation.Vision Research,18, 1013–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D., &Poggio, T. (1976). Cooperative computation of stereo disparity.Science,194, 283–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, J. E. W., &Frisby, J. P. (1976). Rivalrous texture stereograms.Nature,264, 53–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, J. E. W., Frisby, J. P., &Gale, P. (1977). Computation of stereo disparity from rivalrous texture stereograms.Perception,6, 207–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. E., &O’hagan, S. (1972). Accuracy of stereoscopic localization of small line segments that differ in size or orientation for the two eyes.Vision Research,12, 437–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’shea, R. P. (1983).Spatial and temporal determinants of binocular contour rivalry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S., Rao, V. M., Sriram, S., &Vidyasagar, T. R. (1973). The role of colour perception and pattern recognition in stereopsis.Vision Research,13, 505–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, W. (1977). Stereopsis with and without monocular contours.Vision Research,17, 967–969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (1974). Stereopsis by binocular delay.Nature,248, 363–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shippman, S., &Cohen, K. R. (1983). Relationship of heterophoria to stereopsis.Archives of Ophthalmology,101, 609–610.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. M. (1978).Correlational procedures for research. New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, K. (1959).Stereoskopische Untersuchungen für Tiefenlokalisation sogenannter funktionsloser Bestandteile des binocularen Gesichtsfeldes. Unpublished thesis, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision.—Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B,18, 371–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, E., &Weisstein, N. (1985). Spatial frequency affects figureground organization.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,26(Suppl.), 281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by NSF Grant BNS 8418731. Preliminary results were presented to the Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Sarasota, Florida, April 28–May 2, 1986.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’shea, R.P., Blake, R. Depth without disparity in random-dot stereograms. Perception & Psychophysics 42, 205–214 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203072

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203072

Keywords

  • Binocular Rivalry
  • Horizontal Extent
  • Stereoscopic Depth
  • Horizontal Disparity
  • Fixation Disparity