Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Perception & Psychophysics
  3. Article

Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention

  • Published: September 1986
  • Volume 40, pages 331–343, (1986)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Perception & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention
Download PDF
  • Jeff Miller1 
  • 1317 Accesses

  • 279 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Reaction time distributions were obtained from practiced subjects in a go/no-go detection task with attention divided across the visual and auditory modalities. Redundant signals were sometimes presented asynchronously on the two modalities, with the time between signals varying from 0 to 167 msec. An extension of the inequality derived by Miller (1982) was used to test between separate-decisions models, in which the response is initiated solely by whichever signal is detected first, and coactivation models, in which both signals contribute to the activation of a single response. As in previous studies with bimodal detection tasks, the results contradicted separate-decisions models and favored coactivation models. The largest violations of separate-decisions models were observed when the visual signal was presented 67–100 msec before the auditory signal. A new inequality was also derived to discriminate between two classes of coactivation models that differ about whether responses are generated by processes combining activation across time as well as across signals. Violations of this inequality ruled out exponential coactivation models, in which activation processes are sensitive only to the instantaneous properties of the signal(s). Instead, the results require an accumulation model of coactivation, in which both signals provide input to a process that accumulates activation over a considerable period of time, even if signal conditions change during that time.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Selective attention modulates the effect of target location probability on redundant signal processing

Article 17 May 2016

Ting-Yun Chang, Daniel R. Little & Cheng-Ta Yang

Mapping the spatiotemporal dynamics of interference between two visual targets

Article 13 June 2015

Brad Wyble & Garrett Swan

Eriksen flanker delta plot shapes depend on the stimulus

Article 05 November 2020

Michael S. Pratte

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Ashby, F. G. (1982) Testing the assumptions of exponential, additive reaction time modelsMemory & Cognition,10, 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G, &Townsend, J. (1980) Decomposing the reaction time distribution: Pure insertion and selective influence revisited.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,21, 93–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audley, R. J. (1973). Some observations on theories of choice reaction time: Tutorial review. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance (Vol. 4; pp. 509–545). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. H. (1970). Can we see and hear at the same time? Some recent studies of intersensory facilitation of reaction time.Acta Psychologica,33, 21–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. R., Martens, W., Garrett, A., &Westendorf, D. (1980). Estimating probability summation for binocular reaction time data.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 375–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, L., &Luce, R. D. (1956). Decision structure and time relations in simple choice behavior.Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics,18, 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colavita, F. (1974). Human sensory dominance.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 409–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, D. W. J., &Weening, O. (1969). On the combination of evidence from the eye and ear.Ergonomics,12, 383–394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis, P., &Efron, B. (1983). Computer-intensive methods in statistics.Scientific American,248, 116–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife.Annals of Statistics,7, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. (1964). Perceptual-motor skill learning. In A. Melton (Ed.),Categories of human learning (pp. 243–285). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielen, S. C. A. M., Schmidt, R. A., &Van DenHeuvel, P. J M. (1983). On the nature of intersensory facilitation of reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. M., &Smith, A. F. (1982). Detection of auditory signals occurring at random times: Intensity and duration.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, G R. (1972). Application of a variable criterion model to auditory reaction time as a function of the type of catch trial.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, G. R., Canham, L., &Boroughs, J. M. (1984). Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 451–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockley, W. E. (1984). Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 598–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohle, R. (1965). Inferred components of reaction times as functions of foreperiod duration.Journal of Experimental Psychology,69, 382–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, R., Kornhurer, H., &Dafonseca, J. (1963). Multisensory convergence on cortical neurons: Neuronal effects of visual, acoustic and vestibular stimuli in the superior convolutions of the cat’s cortex. In G. Moruzzi, A. Fessard, & H. Jasper (Eds.),Progress in brain research, Vol. 1: Brain mechanisms. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S. (1969). Sequential determinants of information processing in serial and discrete choice reaction time.Psychological Review,76, 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, S. W. (1975). The relative judgment theory of two choice response time.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,12, 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. B. (1976). Effect of task difficulty on the division of attention between nonverbal signals: Independence or interaction?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,28, 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D., &Green, D. M. (1970). Detection of auditory signals presented at random times, H.Perception & Psychophysics,7, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, W. (1963). Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 309–360). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijers, L., &Eijkman, E. (1977). Distributions of simple RT with single and double stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. O. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signalsCognitive Psychology,14, 247–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, R. M., &Shaw, M. L. (1980). Multimodal signal detection: Independent decisions vs. integration.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 471–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1973). Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparation enhancement.Psychological Review,80, 489–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Klein, R. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance.Psychological Review,83, 157–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raab, D. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences,24, 574–590.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review,85, 59–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., &Murdock, B. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory.Psychological Review,83, 190–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. L. (1982). Attending to multiple sources of information: I. The integration of information in decision making.Cognitive Psychology,14, 353–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J. T., &Ashby, F. G. (1983).The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R., &Giray, M. (1986). Separate-activation models with variable base times: Testability and checking of cross-channel dependency.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 248–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, D. (1970). Evidence for an accumulator model of psychophysical discrimination.Ergonomics,13, 37–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, C-009, UCSD, 92093, La Jolla, CA

    Jeff Miller

Authors
  1. Jeff Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was supported by Grant PHS MH40733 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, J. Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics 40, 331–343 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203025

Download citation

  • Received: 02 May 1986

  • Accepted: 25 August 1986

  • Issue Date: September 1986

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203025

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Visual Signal
  • Accumulation Model
  • Catch Trial
  • Auditory Signal
  • Race Model
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

5.135.140.155

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature