Skip to main content

Patent stereopsis with diplopia in random-dot stereograms

Abstract

Fusional limits for an RD (random-dot) stereogram with overall horizontal retinal disparity due to the temporalward pulling of its two constituent RD patterns beyond the divergence limits of the eyes have been determined by using an afterimage method. Two criteria for fusion were used, viz, the perception ofsingle local RD elements and the perception of stereoscopic depth in the “hidden” square of side 1.38 deg with 8-min relative horizontal disparity. The diplopia thresholds were found to be in the range of 0.15–0.3 deg, and hence do not exceed the “classical” upper limit of about 0.3 deg, which has been reported for elementary line stereograms. The stereoscopic limits were found to be in the range of 0.5–1.3 deg, which is compatible with the precision of patent stereopsis from double images which has been reported for elementary line stereograms. The results of the present third look at the experiments performed by Fender and Julesz (1967) suggest that there are no special neuronal processes raising the fusional limits for RD stereograms above those for elementary line stereograms. Previous claims that such special neuronal processes may occur seem to be based on an evaluation of fusional limits obtained with different criteria for fusion. It is further argued that the major hysteresis effect that has been observed for fusional limits for RD stereograms should not be ascribed to a raising of the classical size of the diplopia threshold due to special neuronal processes initiated by RD stereograms, but to a lowering of the classical limits of patent stereopsis from double images due to the increased difficulty of solving the correspondence problem in RD stereograms.

References

  • Blakemore, C. The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man.Journal of Physiology (London), 1970,211, 599–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone, R. A.Diplopia. New York: Elsevier, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone, R. A., &Hardjowijoto, S. What is normal binocular vision?Documenta Ophthalmologica, 1979,47, 163–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diner, D. B.Hysteresis in human binocular fusion: A second Look. Doctoral dissertation, California Institute of Technology, 1978.

  • Ditchburn, R. W.Eye-movements and visual perception. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drysdale, A. E. The visibility of retinal blood vessels.Vision Research, 1975,15, 813–818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duwaer, A. L., &Van Den Brink, G. What is the diplopia threshold?Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,29, 295–309. (a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duwaer, A. L., &Van Den Brink, G. Foveal diplopia thresholds and fixation disparities.Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,30, 321–329. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duwaer, A. L. Assessment of retinal image displacement during active head movement using an afterimage method.Vision Research, 1982,22, 379–1388. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duwaer, A. L. Nonmotor component of fusional response to vertical disparity: A second look using an afterimage method.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1982,72, 871–877. (b)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fender, D., &Julesz, B. Extension of Panum’s fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1967,57, 819–830.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flom, M. C., &Eskridge, J. B. Change in retinal correspondence with viewing distance.Journal of the American Optometric Association, 1968,39, 1094–1097.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebbard, F. W. Comparison of subjective and objective measurements of fixation disparity.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1962,52, 706–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julesz, B.Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhle, S., &Fox, R. Effect of depth separation on meta-contrast masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 605–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linschoten, J. Structuranalyse der binokularen tiefenwahrnehmung. Thesis, University of Utrecht, 1956.

  • Magnussen, S., &Tjorjussen, T. Sustained visual afterimages.Vision Research, 1974,14, 743–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. I. Globality and stereoscopic fusion in binocular vision.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1975,49, 1–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. I. The plasticity of correspondence: Aftereffects, illusions and horopter shifts in depth perception.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1977,66, 203–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, K. N. Disparity limits of stereopsis.Archives of Ophthalmology, 1952,48, 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, K. N. Precision and validity of stereoscopic depth perception from double images.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1953,43, 906–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, K. N. Stereopsis and vertical disparity.Archives of Ophthalmology, 1955,53, 495–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, K. N.Researches in binocular vision. New York: Hafner, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, K. N., &Wakefield, J. M. Stereoscopic depth and binocular rivalry.Vision Research, 1967,7, 89–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reading, R. W. The threshold of distance discrimination for objects located outside Panum’s area.American Journal of Optometry, 1970,47, 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, W. Stereopsis with and without monocular contours.Vision Research, 1977,17, 967–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, L. A., &Niehl, E. W. Eye movements recorded during convergence and divergence.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1960,50, 913–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, C. W., &Julesz, B. On the depth of the cyclopean retina.Experimental Brain Research, 1980,40, 196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer, G., &Tanzman, I. J. Qualitative depth localization with diplopic images. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1956,46, 116–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duwaer, A.L. Patent stereopsis with diplopia in random-dot stereograms. Perception & Psychophysics 33, 443–454 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202895

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202895

Keywords

  • Binocular Rivalry
  • Stereoscopic Depth
  • Double Image
  • Optical Society ofAmerica
  • Horizontal Disparity