Abstract
The insertion of noise in the silent intervals of interrupted speech has a very striking perceptual effect if a certain signal-to-noise ratio is used. Conflicting reports have been published as to whether the inserted noise improves speech intelligibility or not. The major difference between studies was the level of redundancy in the speech material. We show in the present paper that the noise leads to a better intelligibility of interrupted speech. The redundancy level determines the possible amount of improvement. The consequences of our findings are discussed. in relation to such phenomena as continuity perception and pulsation threshold measurement. A hypothesis is formulated for the processing of interrupted stimuli with and without intervening noise: for stimuli presented with intervening noise, the presence in the auditory system of an automatic interpolation mechanism is assumed. The mechanism operates only if the noise makes it impossible to perceive the interruption.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bocca, E., &Calearo, C. Central hearing processes. In J. Jerger (Ed.),Modern developments in audiology. New York: Academic Press, 1963.
Cherry, E. C. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1953,25, 975–979.
Cherry, E. C., &Taylor, W. K. Some further experiments upon the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1954, 26, 554–559.
Cherry, E. C., &Wiley, R. Speech communication in very noisy environments.Nature, 1967,214, 1164.
Dirks, D. D., &Bower, D. Effect of forward and backward masking on speech intelligibility.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1970,47, 1003–1007.
Hopkinson, N. T. Combined effects of interruption and inter-aural alternation on speech intelligibility.Language and Speech, 1967,10, 234–243.
Houtgast, T. Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972,51, 1885–1894.
Houtgast, T.Lateral suppression in hearing (Doctoral dissertation, Free University Amsterdam). Amsterdam: Academische pers, 1974.
Huggins, A. W. F. Distortion of the temporal pattern of speech: Interruption and alternation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964,36, 1055–1064.
Huggins, A. W. F. Temporally segmented speech and “echoic” storage. In A. Cohen &: S. G. Nooteboom (Eds.),Structure and process in speech perception. New York: Springer, 1975. (a)
Huggins, A. W. F. Temporally segmented speech.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 149–157. (b)
Hughes, G. W., House, A. S., Goldstein, D. P., &Rupf, J. A. Is the intelligibility of alternated speech related to rate or place of alternation?Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1966,40, 1283–7H9.
Kreul, E. J. Speech intelligibility for interaural alternated speech with and without intervening noise for words and nonsense.Language and Speech, 1971,14, 99–107.
Marks, L. E., &Miller, G. A. The role of semantic and syntactic constraints in the memorization of English sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1964,3, 1–5.
Miller, G. A., &Licklider, J. C. R. The intelligibility of interrupted speech.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1950,11, 167–173.
Powers, G. L., &Speaks, C. Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1973,54, 661–667.
Powers, G. L., &Wilcox, J. C. Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,61, 195–199.
Schubert, E. D., &Parker, C. D. Addition to Cherry’s finding on switching speech between the two ears.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955,27, 792–794.
Siegel, S.Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, 1956.
Speaks, C., &Trooien, T. T. Interaural alternation and speech intelligibility.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974,56, 640–644.
Verschuure, J. Pulsation threshold patterns and neurophysiological tuning. In E. F. Evans &: J. P. Wilson (Bds.),Psychophysics and physiology of hearing. London: Academic Press, 1977.
Verschuure, J.Auditory excitation patterns (Doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam). Delft: W. D. Meinema, 1978.
Verschuure, J. Pulsation patterns and nonlinearity of auditory tuning. I. Psychophysical results.Acustica, 1981,49, 288–295. (a)
Verschuure, J. Pulsation patterns and nonlinearity of auditory tuning. II. Analysis of psychophysical results.Acustica, 1981,49, 296–306. (b)
Verschuure, J., Rodenburg, M., &Maas, A. J. J. Presentation conditions of the pulsation threshold method.Acustica, 1976,35, 47–54.
Wingfield, A., &Wheale, J. L. Interaural alternation, information load, and speech intelligibility.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975,57, 1219–1220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verschuure, J., Brocaar, M.P. Intelligibility of interrupted meaningful and nonsense speech with and without intervening noise. Perception & Psychophysics 33, 232–240 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202859
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202859