Abstract
In order to reveal the psychological representation of movement from American Sign Language (ASL), deaf native signers and hearing subjects unfamiliar with sign were asked to make triadic comparisons of movements that had been isolated from lexical and from grammatically inflected signs. An analysis of the similarity judgments revealed a small set of physically specifiable dimensions that accounted for most of the variance. The dimensions underlying the perception of lexical movement were in general different from those underlying inflectional movement, for both groups of subjects. Most strikingly, deaf and hearing subjects significantly differed in their patterns of dimensional salience for movements, both at the lexical and at the inflectional levels. Linguistically relevant dimensions were of increased salience to native signers. The difference in perception of linguistic movement by native signers and by naive observers demonstrates that modification of natural perceptual categories after language acquisition is not bound to a particular transmission modality, but rather can be a more general consequence of acquiring a formal linguistic system.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
Bellugi, U., & Klima, E. S.The acquisition of three morphological systems in American Sign Language. (Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, Vol. 21, K1-35). Stanford University, 1982.
Loomis, J., Poizner, H., Bellugi, U., Blakemore, A., & Hollerbach, J.Computer graphic modelling of American Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript, The Salk Institute, 1982.
Pruzansky, S.How to use SINDSCAL. A computer program for individual differences in multidimensional scaling. Murray Hill, N.J: Bell Telephone Laboratories, 1975.
Kruskal, J. B., Young, F. W., & Seery, J. B.How to use KYST-2A, a very flexible program to do multidimensional scaling and unfolding. Murray Hill, N.J: Bell Telephone Laboratories, 1978.
References
Aslin, R. N., &Pisoni, D. B. Effects of early linguistic experience on speech discrimination by infants: A critique of Eilers, Gavin, lind Wilson (1979).Child Development, 1980,51, 107–112.
Bellman, K., Poizner, H., & Bellugi, U. Invariant characteristics of some American Sign Language morphological processes.Discourse Processes, in press.
Bellum, U. The structuring of language: Clues from the similarities between signed and spoken language. In U. Bellugi & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.),Signed and spoken language: Biological constraints on linguistic form (Dahlem Konferenzen), Weinheim/Deerfield Beach, Fla: Verlag Chemie, 1980.
Bellum, U., Klima, E. S., &Siple, P. Remembering in signs.Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1975,3, 93–125.
Carroll, J. D., &Arabie, P. Multidimensional scaling.Annual Review ofPsychology, 1980,31, 607–649.
Carroll, J. D., &Chang, J. J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-WAY generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition.Psychometrika, 1970,35, 283–319.
Eimas, P. D. Auditory and phonetic coding of the cues for speech: Discrimination of the [r-l] distinction by young infants.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 341–347.
Fischer, S., &Gough, B. Verbs in American Sign Language.Sign Language Studies, 1978,18, 17–48.
Hartigan, J. A.Clustering algorithms. New York: Wiley, 1975.
Helm, C. E. A multidimensional ratio scaling analysis of perceived color relations.Journal ofthe Optical Society ofAmerica, 1964,54, 256–262.
Johansson, G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 201–211.
Johnson, S. C. Hierarchical clustering schemes.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 241–254.
Julesz, B., &Hirsh, I. J. Visual and auditory perception—An essay of comparison. In E. E. David & P. B. Denes (Eds.),Human communication: A unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.
Jusczyk, P. W., Pisoni, D. B., Walley, A., &Murray, J. Discrimination of relative onset time of two component tones by infants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980,67, 262–270.
Klima, E. S., &Bellugi, U.The signs of language. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1979.
Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 1–27. (a)
Kruskal, J. B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 115–129. (b)
Lane, H., &Grosjean, F. (Eds.)Recent perspectives on American Sign Language. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1980.
Levelt, W. J. M., Van De Geer, J. P., &Plomp, R. Triadic comparisons of musical intervals.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1966,19, 163–179.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. S., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 431–461.
Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R. R., Liberman, A. M., Jenkins, J. J., &Fujimura, O. An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese and English.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 331–340.
Newkirk, D., Klima, E. S., Pedersen, C. C., &Bellugi, U. Linguistic evidence from slips of the hand. In V. Fromkin (Ed.),Errors in linguistic performance. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
Newport, E. S. Task specificity in language learning? Evidence from speech perception and American Sign Language. In L. R. Gleitman & E. Wanner (Eds.),Language acquisition: The state ofthe art. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Pisoni, D. B. Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: Implications for voicing perception in stops.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,61, 1352–1361.
Poizner, H., Battison, R., &Lane, H. Cerebral asymmetry for American Sign Language: The effects of moving stimuli.Brain and Language, 1979,7, 351–362.
Poizner, H., Bellugi, U., &Lutes-Driscoll, V. Perception of American Sign Language in dynamic point-light displays.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981,7, 430–440.
Poizner, H., Bellugi, U., &Tweney, R. D. Processing of formational, semantic, and iconic information of signs from American Sign Language.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981,7, 1146–1159.
Poizner, H., Klima, E. S., Bellugi, U., & Livingston, R. Motion analysis of grammatical processes in American Sign Language.SIGGRAPH/SIGART workshop on motion: Representation and Perception, in press.
Poizner, H., &Lane, H. Discrimination of location in American Sign Language. In P. Siple (Ed.),Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Poizner, H., Newkirk, D., Bellugi, U., &Klima, E. S. Representation of inflected signs from American Sign Language in short-term memory.Memory & Cognition, 1981,9, 121–131.
Schwartz, J., &Tallal, P. Rate of acoustic change may underlie hemispheric specialization for speech perception.Science, 1980,207, 1380–1381.
Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function, I.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 125–140.(a)
Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function, II.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 219–246. (b)
Shepard, R. N. Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering.Science, 1980,210, 390–398.
Siple, P. (Ed.).Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Stokoe, W. C., Casterline, D. C., &Croneberg, C. G.A dictionary of American Sign Language. Washington, D.C: Oallaudet College Press, 1965.
Strange, W., &Jenkins, J. J. The role of linguistic experiencein perception. In H. L. Pick, Jr., & R. D. Wald (Eds.),Perception and experience. New York: Plenum, 1979.
Stunois, J. Identification and discrimination of handshape in American Sign Language.Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,29, 261–276.
Supalla, T. Morphology of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. In F. Caccamise & D. Hicks (Eds.),Proceedings of the Second National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching. Silver Spring, Md: National Association of the Deaf, 1980.
Supalla, T., &Newport, E. How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In P. Siple (Ed.),Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Wilbur, R.American Sign Language and sign systems: Research and applications. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press, 1979.
Wish, M., &Carroll, J. D. Application of individual differences scaling to studies of human perception and judgment. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.),Handbook of perception (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1974.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant HD13249 and by National Science Foundation Grant BNS79-16423 to the Salk Institute for Biological Studies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poizner, H. Perception of movement in American Sign Language: Effects of linguistic structure and linguistic experience. Perception & Psychophysics 33, 215–231 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202858
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202858