Abstract
Because it may be deduced from the more elementary principles of visual processing, global precedence (Navon, 1977) is not a primary perceptual principle. Subjects were presented with a large letter made out of small ones and asked to make an identification response on the basis of either the large or small letter. When fixation was controlled to provide adequate stimulation from the small letter, there was no difference in reaction time (RT) between the large and small targets. Also, there was no difference in interference due to response incompatibility of the unattended letter based on target size. However, when the stimulus was presented peripherally, unpredictably to the right or left of fixation, RT was faster to the large target and interference was substantially greater for the small target. Functions for the development of associative strength and associative interference are presented. Global precedence is dependent on factors tending to degrade small stimuli more than large ones.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boer, L. C., &Kuess, P. J. G. Global precedence as a postperceptual effect: An analysis of speed-accuracy tradeoff functions.Perception & Psychophysics, 1982,31, 358–366.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 143–149.
Eriksen, C. W., &Schultz, D. W. Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,25, 249–263.
Grice, G. R. Accurate reaction time research with the TRS-80 microcomputer.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1981,13, 674–676.
Grice, G. R., Canham, L., &Schafer, C. Development of associative and perceptual interference.Perception & Psychophysics, 1982,32, 375–387.
Grice, G. R., Nullmeyer, R., &Spiker, V. A. Human reaction time: Toward a general theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1982,111, 135–153.
Grice, G. R., &Spiker, V. A. Speed-accuracy tradeoff in choice reaction time: Within conditions, between conditions, and between subjects.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,26, 118–126.
Grice, G. R., Spiker, V. A., &Nullmeyer, R. Variable criterion analysis of individual differences and stimulus similarity in choice reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,25, 353–370.
Hoffman, J. E. Interaction between global and local levels of a form.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 222–234.
Kinchla, R. A., &Wolfe, J. M. The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out.”Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,25, 225–231.
Martin, M. Local and global processing: The role of sparsity.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 476–484.
Miller, J. Global precedence in attention and decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981,7, 1161–1174.
Navon, D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 353–383.
Navon, D. The forest revisited: More on global precedence.Psychological Research, 1981,43, 1–32. (a)
Navon, D. Do attention and decision follow perception? Comment on Miller.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981,7, 1175–1182. (b)
Sternberg, S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method.Acta Psychologica, 1969,30, 276–315.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by PHS Grant MH 16400 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grice, G.R., Canham, L. & Boroughs, J.M. Forest before trees? It depends where you look. Perception & Psychophysics 33, 121–128 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202829
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202829