Abstract
Monocular pattern alternation refers to the changes over time in the apparent contrast of the components of a pattern formed by superimposing two sinusoidal gratings. In Experiment 1, alternation rate was measured as a function of the orientation, spatial frequency, and mean luminance of the pattern. Experiment 2 determined pattern alternation rate as a function of orientation, spatial frequency, and contrast. For both experiments, alternation was greater for patterns whose components were horizontal and vertical than for patterns whose components were obliquely oriented. These differences were more pronounced at intermediate than at high and low spatial frequencies. With decreases in mean luminance, there was a decline in both the rate of alternation and the differences in rate due to orientation. There was no significant effect of contrast upon alternation rate. Experiment 3 determined the effects of viewing time upon pattern alternation. For both horizontal-vertical and oblique patterns, the frequency of alternation increased with time up to 100-200 sec and then leveled off. However, the rate of increase with time was greater for horizontal-vertical patterns. These results were discussed in terms of the antagonistic interaction between channels tuned to spatial frequency and orientation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, D. P. (1967). Perception of contour in the central fovea. Part II. Spatial integration.Vision Research,7, 999–1013.
Atkinson, J., Campbell, F. W., Fiorenttni, A., &Maffei, L. (1973). The dependence of monocular rivalry upon spatial frequency.Perception,2, 127–133.
Berkley, M. A., Kitterle, F. L., &Watkins, D. W. (1975). Grating visibility as a function of orientation and retinal eccentricity.Vision Research,15, 239–244.
Bowker, D. O., &Mandler, M. B. (1981). Apparent contrast of superthreshold gratings varies with stimulus orientation.Perception & Psychophysics,29, 585–588.
Campbell, F. W., Gilinsky, A. S., Howell, E. R., Riggs, L. A., &Atkinson, J. (1973). The dependence of monocular rivalry on orientation.Perception,2, 123–125.
Campbell, F. W., &Howell, E. R. (1972). A method for investigating pattern vision.Journal of Physiology (London),210, 19–20P.
Campbell, F. W., Kulikowski, J. J., &Levinson, J. (1966). The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings.Journal of Physiology (London),187, 427–436.
Coren, S., Porac, C., &Ward, L. M., (1978).Sensation andperception. New York: Academic Press.
Corwin, T. R., Volpe, L. C., &Tyler, W. C. (1976). Images and afterimages of sinusoidal gratings.Vision Research,16, 345–350.
Crassini, B., &Broerse, J. (1982). Monocular rivalry occurs without eye movements.Vision Research,22, 203–204.
Erke, H., &Graser, H. (1972). Reversibility of perceived motion: Selective adaptation of the human visual system to speed, size and orientation.Vision Research,12, 69–87.
Essock, E. A. (1982). Anistropies of perceived contrast and detection speed.Vision Research,9, 1185–1192.
Furchner, C. S., &Ginsburg, A. P. (1978). “Monocular rivalry” of a complex waveform.Vision Research,18, 1641–1648.
Furchner, C. S., &Young, S. J. (1975). Recovery from adaptation as a function of stimulus orientation.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 117–124.
Georgeson, M. A., &Phillips, R. (1980). Angular selectivity of monocular rivalry: Experiment and computer simulation.Vision Research,20, 1007–1013.
Kitterle, F. L. (1973). The possible locus of lightness contrast.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 585–589.
Kitterle, F. L., Kaye, R. S., &Nixon, H. (1974). Pattern alternation: Effects of spatial frequency and orientation.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 543–546.
Kitterle, F. L., Leguire, L. E., &Riley, J. A. (1975). The effects of target orientation on threshold during early dark adaptation.Vision Research,15, 1294–1296.
Kitterle, F. L., &Thomas, J. (1980). The effects of spatial frequency, orientation, and color upon binocular rivalry and monocular pattern alternation.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,16, 405–407.
Mapperson, B., Bowling, A., &Lovegrove, W. (1982). Problems for an after-image explanation of monocular rivalry.Vision Research,21, 1233–1234.
Rentschler, I., &Fiorentini, A. (1974). Meridional anistrophy of psychophysical spatial interactions.Vision Research,14, 1267–1275.
Sindermann, F., &Luddeke, H. (1972). Monocular analogues to binocular contour rivalry.Vision Research,12, 763–772.
Stromeyer, C. F., Lange, A. F., &Ganz, L. (1973). Spatial frequency phase effects in human vision.Vision Research,13, 2345–2360.
Thomas, J. (1977). An inhibitory model for monocular pattern alternation.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 310–312.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kitterle, F.L., Kaye, R.S. Monocular pattern alternation: Effects of mean luminance and contrast. Perception & Psychophysics 36, 381–386 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202792
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202792