Advertisement

Memory & Cognition

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 837–845 | Cite as

Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task

  • Steven M. Smith
  • Thomas B. Ward
  • Jay S. Schumacher
Article

Abstract

In three experiments we tested the conformity hypothesis—that subjects' ideas would conform to examples they had been shown—by using a creative generation paradigm in which subjects imagined and sketched new exemplars of experimenter-defined categories. Designs madeby subjects who had first seen three examples of ideas were compared with those of control subjects, who received no examples. In all three experiments, the designs of subjects who had seen the examples were more likely to contain features of the examples. This conformity effect did not significantly decrease in Experiment 2, when a 23-mm task was interpolated between viewing the examples and generating related ideas. The hypothesis that the observed conformity effects may have been caused by subjects' assumptions that they should try to generate ideas similar to the examples was refuted in Experiment 3; explicitly instructing subjects to create ideas that were verydifferent from the examples did not decrease conformity to the examples, and instructing them to conform to the examples significantly increased conformity. The results show that recent experience can lead to unintentional conformity, constraining the generation of creative ideas.

Keywords

Creative Thinking Generation Task Creative Idea Creative Generation Introductory Psychology Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barsalou, L. W. (1987), The instability ofgraded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.),Concepts and conceptualdevelopment: Ecological and intellectualfactors in categorization (pp. 101–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., &Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach.Cognitive Psychology,3, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., &Smith, S. M. (1992).Creative cognition: Theory, research,and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Gick, M. L., &Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving.Cognitive Psychology,12, 306–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jansson, D. G., &Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation.Design Studies,12, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Luchins, A. S., &Luchins, E. H. (1959).Rigidity of behavior. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research.Memory & Cognition,12, 531–552.Google Scholar
  8. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Roediger, H. L., III (1974). Inhibiting effects of recall.Memory & Cognition,2, 261–269.Google Scholar
  10. Roediger, H. L., III, &Neely, J. H. (1982). Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 213–242.Google Scholar
  11. Ross, B. H., Ryan, W. J., &Tenpenny, P. L. (1989). The access of relevant information for solving problems.Memory& Cognition,17, 639–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rundus, D. (1973). Negative effects of using list items as recall cues.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Slamecka, N. J. (1968). An examination of trace storage in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 504–513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith, S. M., &Blankenship, S. E. (1989). Incubation effects.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 311–314.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, S. M., &Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence offixation in problem solving.American Journal ofPsychology,104, 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ward, T. B. (in press). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation.Cognitive Psychology.Google Scholar
  17. Weisberg, R. W., &Alba, J. W. (1981). An examination ofthe alleged role of “fixation” in the solution of several “insight” problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven M. Smith
    • 1
  • Thomas B. Ward
    • 1
  • Jay S. Schumacher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege Station

Personalised recommendations