Abstract
In three experiments, the meaning activation of ambiguous nouns in novel nominal compounds was investigated. Ambiguous nouns were unbalanced homographs occurring as the second members of the compound. Meaningful interpretations of the compounds were based on either the dominant or the subordinate meaning of the ambiguous noun. In Experiment 1, visually presented novel compounds serving as primes were followed at varying intervals by targets associatively related to distinct meanings of the ambiguous noun. In a lexical decision task, facilitation effects were found only for targets related to the meaning that was relevant for the interpretation of the compound. Experiment 2 showed that interactive activation could not be attributed to differences in semantic relatedness between the first members of compounds and targets. Experiment 3 demonstrated equal intralexical relatedness between members for both types of compounds. It is proposed that interactive activation may facilitate the interpretation of the novel compound. Compatible meaning aspects of the nouns may become more strongly activated, and incompatible meaning aspects may not become activated. The selection of meaning aspects relevant for interpretation would thereby be simplified.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bauer, L. (1983).English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boase-Beier, J. (1987).Poetic compounds (pp. 37–84). Tubingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Burgess, C., &Simpson, G. B. (1988). Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings.Brain & Language,33, 86–103.
Burnage, G. (1990).CELEX:Aguidefor users. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: University of Nijmegen.
Coolen, R., Van Jaarsveld, H. J., &Schreuder, R. (1991). The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds.Memory & Cognition,19, 341–352.
Downing, P. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns.Language,53, 810–842.
Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., &Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 429–446.
Gleitman, L. R., &Gleitman, H. (1970).Phrase and paraphrase: Some innovative uses of language. New York: Norton.
Gorfein, D. S. (1989).Resolving semantic ambiguity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hogaboam, T. W., &Perfetti C. A. (1975). Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 265–274.
Kellas, G., Paul, S. T., Martin, M., &Simpson, G. B. (1991). Contextual feature activation and meaning access. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.),Undersranding word and sentence (pp. 47–71). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers.
Kiger, J. I., &Glass, A. L. (1983). The facilitation of lexical decisions by a prime occurring after the target.Memory & Cognition,11, 356–365.
Lees, R, B. (1970). Problems in the grammatical analysis of English nominal compounds. In M. Bierwisch & K. E. Heidolph (Eds.),Progress in linguistics (pp. 174–186). The Hague: Mouton.
Levi, J. N. (1978).The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. London: Academic Press.
Lucas, M. M. (1987). Frequency effects on the processing of ambiguous words in sentence contexts.Language & Speech,30, 25–46.
Murphy, G. L. (1988). Comprehending complex concepts.Cognitive Science,12, 529–562.
Murphy, G. L. (1990). Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 259–288.
Neely, J. H., &Keefe, D. E. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word recognition: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 207–248). New York: Academic Press:
Onifer, W., &Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias.Memory & Cognition,9, 225–236.
O'Regan, J. K. (1984). How the eye scans isolated words. In A. G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.),Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 159–168). Amsterdam: North-Holland! Elsevier Science Publishers.
O'Regan, J. K., Lévy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., &Brugaillere, B. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 250–257.
Peterson, R. R., &Simpson, G. B. (1989). Effect of backward priming on word recognition in single-word and sentence contexts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1020–1032.
Rayner, K., &Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.Memory & Cognition,14, 191–201.
Rayner, K., &Frazier, L. (1989). Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 779–790.
Schvaneveldt, R. W., Meyer, D. E., &Becker, C. A. (1976). Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 243–256.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., &Lacount, K. L. (1988). Semantic relatedness and the scope of facilitation for upcoming words in sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 344–354.
Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., &Bienkowsiu, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing.Cognitive Psychology,14, 489–537.
Simpson, G. B. (1981). Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 120–136.
Simpson, G. B. (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.Psychological Bulletin,96, 316–340.
Simpson, G. B. (Ed.) (1991).Understanding word and sentence. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers.
Simpson, G. B., &Burgess, C. (1985). Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 28–39.
Simpson, G. B., &Kellas, G. (1989). Dynamic contextual processes and lexical access. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.),Resolving semantic ambiguity (pp. 40–56). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Simpson, G. B., &Krueger, M. A. (1991). Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence contexts.Journal ofMemory & Language,30, 627–643.
Small, S. L., Cottitell, G. W., &Tanenhaus, M. K. (1988).Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology and artificial intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 645–659.
Tabossi, P. (1988). Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 324–340.
Tabossi, P. (1991). Understanding words in context. In G.B. Simpson (Ed.),Understanding word and sentence (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). Evidence for multiple stage in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 427–440.
Van Dale (1984).Groot Woordenboek der Nederlandse Taal. Utrecht/Antwerpen: Van Dale Lexicografie.
Whitney, P., Mckay, T., Kellas, G., &Emerson, W. A. (1985). Semantic activation of noun concepts in context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 126–135.
Wisniewski, E. J., &Gentner, D. (1991). On the combinatorial semantics of noun pairs: Minor and major adjustments. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.),Understanding word and sentence (pp. 241–285). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coolen, R., Van Jaarsveld, H.J. & Schreuder, R. Processing novel compounds: Evidence for interactive meaning activation of ambiguous nouns. Mem Cogn 21, 235–246 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202736
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202736