Abstract
Kosslyn (1980, 1983) theorized that performance measures on imagery tasks may vary as a function of the existence of independent processes in imaging ability. Tue present study determined whether improvement can be made in performance on such tasks with practice. It also considered whether performance on such tasks improves with practice and whether this improvement generalizes. Experiment 1 determined whether improvement in a mental rotation task generalizes to improvement in a geometric analogies task, with both tasks weighted in Kosslyn'sfind process, but not in a line drawing memory task weighted in Kosslyn'sregenerate process. In Experiment 2, we examined generalization in improvement from a geometric analogies task to a mental rotation task. In Experiment 3, we tested whether improvement in an animal imagery task (Kosslyn, 1975) generalizes to improvement in a line drawing memory task, with both tasks weighted in Kosslyn'sregenerate process, but not to improvement in a mental rotation task. Performance improved with practice on all tasks. Furthermore, performance improved from one task to another only if both tasks loaded on the same process.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Attneave, F. (1957). Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes.Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 221–227.
Attneave, F., &Arnoult, M. D. (1956). The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception.Psychological Bulletin,53, 452–471.
Bower, G. H. (1972). Mental imagery and associative learning. In L. Gregg (Ed.),Cognition in learning and memory (pp. 51–88). New York: Wiley.
Cooper, L. A. (1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes.Cognitive Psychology,7, 20–43.
Cooper, L. A. (1976a). Demonstration of a mentalanalog of an external rotation.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 296–302.
Cooper, L. A. (1976b). Individual differences in visual comparison processes.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 433–444.
Gordon, R. (1949). An investigation into some of the factors that favor the formation of stereotyped images.British Journal of Psychology,39, 156–167.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1975). Information representation in visual images.Cognitive Psychology,7, 341–370.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980).Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1983).Ghosts in the mind's machine: Creating and using images in the brain. New York: Norton.
Kosslyn, S. M., &Alper, S. N. (1977). On the pictorial properties of visual images: Effects of image size on memory for words.Canadian Journal of Psychology,31, 32–40.
Kosslyn, S. M., Brunn, J., Cave, K. R., &Wallach, R. W. (1984). Individual differences in mental imagery ability: A computational analysis.Cognition,18, 195–243.
Kosslyn, S. M., Reiser, B. J., Farah, M. J., &Fliegel, S. L. (1983). Generating visual images.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 278–303.
Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures.British Journal of Psychology,64, 17–24.
Marks, D. F. (1989). Construct validity of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire.Perceptual & Motor Skills,69, 459–465.
Mumaw, R. J., Pellegrino, J. W., Kail, R. V., Jr., &Carter, P. (1984). Different slopes for different folks: Process analysis of spatial aptitude.Memory & Cognition,12, 515–521.
Novick, L. R., &Tversky, B. (1987). Cognitive constraints on ordering operations: The case of geometric analogies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 50–67.
Parsons, L. M. (1987). Visual discrimination of abstract mirrorreflected three-dimensional objects at manyorientations.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 49–59.
Perry, C. W. (1973). Imagery, fantasy, and hypnotic susceptibility.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,26, 217–221.
Sheparo, R. N., &Cooper, L. A. (1983).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shepard, R. N., &Farrell, J. E. (1985). Representation of the orientation of shapes.Acta Psychologica,59, 103–121.
Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. (1971), Mental rotation of threedimensional objects.Science,171, 701–703.
Sutcliffe, J. P., Perry, C. W., &Sheehan, P. A. (1970). Relation of some aspects of imagery and fantasy to hypnotic susceptibility.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,76, 279–287.
Thurstone, L. L., &Jeffrey, T. E. (1966).Closure Speed Test administration manual. Chicago: University of Chicago, Industrial Relations Center.
Vanderplas, J. M., &Garvin, E. A. (1959). Complexity, association value, and practice as factors in shape recognition following pairedassociate training.Journal of Experimental Psychology,57, 155–163.
Wallace, B. (1990a). Hypnotic susceptibility and the modification of cognitive search strategies.International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis,38, 60–69.
Wallace, B. (1990b). Imagery vividness, hypnotic susceptibility, and the perception of fragmented stimuli.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,58, 354–359.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Victor Higgins, Mary Swift, and Jeannie Wareham are gratefully acknowledged for their assistance with data collection and analyses.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wallace, B., Hofelich, B.G. Process generalization and the prediction of performance on mental imagery tasks. Mem Cogn 20, 695–704 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202719
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202719