Abstract
The literature concerning implicit memory presents conflicting evidence on the importance of meaning in recovering recently studied words. When thesame cues are used during testing, indirect instructions reduce levels of processing effects relative to those obtained with direct instructions, suggesting that meaning is not as likely to be retrieved on indirect tests. However, with certain cues, meaning set size of the studied words affects performance even under indirect instructions, suggesting that meaning is retrieved on such tests. The purpose of the present experiments was to resolve this apparent inconsistency. In Experiment 1, the effects of levels of processing and meaning set size were evaluated under direct and indirect test instructions, with the use of stem and word-fragment cues. In other experiments, beginning and ending stem cues were compared, and levels, set size, and instructional effects were evaluated using meaning cues. The findings indicated that levels effects were determined more by test instructions than by test cues, and that set size effects were determined more by test cues than by test instructions. Implications are discussed for transfer-appropriate processing viewpoints and for a model in which it is assumed that performance is determined by searching either explicit or implicit memories.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.Psychological Review,79, 97–123.
Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaming, Memory, & Cognition,15, 657–668.
Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 268–294.
Graf, P., &Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Leaming & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568.
Graf, P., &Ryan, L. (1990). Transfer-appropriate processing for implicit and explicit memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, & Cognition,16, 978–992.
Graf, P., &Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 501–518.
Hamann, S. B. (1990). Level-of-processing effects in conceptually driven implicit tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 970–977.
Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 356–388.
Hayman.C. A. G., &Tulving, E. (1989). Contingent dissociation between recognition and fragment completion: The method of triangulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 228–240.
Horowitz, L. M., White, M. A., &Atwood, D. W. (1968). Word fragments as aids to recall: The organization of a word.Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 219–226.
Jones, G. V. (1987). Independence and exclusivity among psychological processes: Implications for the structure of recall.Psychological Review,94, 229–235.
Light, L. L., &Singh, A. (1987). Implicit and explicit memory in young and older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 531–541.
Nelson, D. L. (1981). Many are called but few are chosen: The influence of context on the effects of category size. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 129–162). New York: Academic Press.
Nelson, D. L., Bajo, M. T., &Canas, J. (1987). Prior knowledge and memory: The episodic encoding of implicitly activated associates and rhymes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 54–63.
Nelson, D. L., Canas, J., &Bajo, M. T. (1987). The effects of natural category size on memory for episodic encodings.Memory & Cognition,15, 133–140.
Nelson, D. L., Canas, J., Bajo, M. T., &Keelean, P. (1987). Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 542–552.
Nelson, D. L., Keelean, P. D., &Negrao, M. (1989). Word-fragment cuing: The lexical search hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, & Cognition,15, 388–397.
Nelson, D. L., &McEvoy, C. L. (1979). Encoding Context and set size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human learning & Memory,5, 292–314.
Nelson, D. L., &McEvoy, C. L. (1984). Word Fragments as retrieval cues; Letter generation or search through nonsemantic memory?American Journal of Psychology,97, 17–36.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., Janczura, G. A., & Xu, J. (1992).Reductions in the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall: Decay, interference, or inhibition. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., &Schreiber, T. A. (1990). Encoding context and retrieval conditions as determinants of the effects of natural category size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 31–41.
Nelson, D. L., &Schreiber, T. A. (1992). Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 237–260.
Nelson, D. L., Schreiber, T. A., &McEvoy, C. L. (1992). Processing implicit and explicit representations.Psychological Review,99, 322–348.
Raaijmakers, J. G. &Shiffrin, A. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.
Richardson-Klavehn, A., &Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory.Annual Review of Psychology,39, 475–543.
Roediger, H. L., III (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering.American Psychologist,45, 1043–1056.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. In D. S. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),Memory and cognitive processes: The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference (pp. 349–379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roediger, H. L., III,Srinivas, K., &Weldon, M. S. (1989). Dissociations between implicit measures of retention. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.),Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 67–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 501–518.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review,84, 127–190.
Squire, L. R. (1987).Memory and brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
Squire, L. R., Shimamura, A. P., &Graf, P. (1985). Independence of recognition memory and priming effects: A neuropsychological analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 37–44.
Souire, L. R., Shimamura, A. P., &Graf, P. (1987). Strength and duration of priming effects in normal subjects and amnesic patients.Neuropsychologia,25, 195–210.
Srinivas, K. S., &Roediger, H. L., III (1990). Classifying implicit memory tests: Category association and anagram solution.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 389–412.
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there?American Psychologist,40, 385–398.
Tulving, E., &Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems.Science,247, 301–306.
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., &Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, & Cognition,8, 336–342.
Weldon, M. S. (1991). Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 526–541.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant MH 16360 to the first author from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, D.L., Schreiber, T.A. & Holley, P.E. The retrieval of controlled and automatic aspects of meaning on direct and indirect tests. Mem Cogn 20, 671–684 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202717
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202717