Abstract
Some words have fewer direct associates than others, and, when words varying in set size are studied in a list-learning task, those with smaller sets are more likely to be recalled. This setsize effect is found in cued recall when the words are studied in the absence of related words, but not when studied in the presence of related words. Related words provide context and theoretically inhibit irrelevant associates. The present research determined that set-size effects are found when words are encoded in sentence contexts. In contrast to list-learning experiments, the results of three experiments found such effects even when lexically related words were present in the sentences. Other findings indicated that target-set-size effects were determined by the proximity of related words in the sentence and the nature of the test cue. The results are discussed in relation to a model for explaining set-size effects and to selective findings from the sentence-comprehension literature.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bahrick, H.P. (1970). Two-phase model for prompted recall.Psychological Review,77, 215–222.
Barsalou, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts.Memory & Cognition,10, 82–93.
Foss, D. J. (1982). A discourse on semantic priming.Cognitive Psychology,14, 590–607.
Gernsbachs, M. A., &Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &. Cognition,17, 245–262.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., &Faust, M. E. (1990) Investigating differences in general comprehension skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 430–445.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixation to comprehension.Psychological Review,87, 329–354.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
Nelson, D. L. (1989). Implicitly activated knowledge and memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Floweree Symposium on Cognition (pp.369–387). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nelson, D. L., Bajo, M. T., &Casanueva, D. (1985). Prior knowledge and memory: The influence of natural category size as a function of intention and distraction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 94–105.
Nelson.D. L., Canas.J., &Bajo, M. T. (1987). The effects of natural category size on memory for episodic encodings.Memory & Cognition,15, 133–140.
Nelson, D. L., &Friedrich, M. A. (1980). Encoding and cuing sounds and senses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 717–731.
Nelson, D. L., &Keelean, P. D., &Negrao, M. (1989). Word-fragment cuing: The lexical search hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 388–397.
Nelson, D. L., &McEvoy, C. L. (1979). Encoding context and set size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 292–314.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., Janczura, G. A., & Xu, J. (1992).Reductions in the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall: Decay, interference, or inhibition? Manuscript submitted for publication.
Nelson, D. L., McEvov, C. L., &Schreiber, T. A. (1990). Encoding context and retrieval conditions as determinants of the effects of natural category size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 31–41.
Nelson, D. L., &Schreiber, T. A. (1992). Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall.Journal of Memory and Language,31, 237–260.
Nelson, D. L., Schreiber, T. A., &McEvoy, C. L. (1992). Processing implicit and explicit representations.Psychological Review,99, 322–348.
Onifer, W., &Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias.Memory & Cognition,9, 225–236.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., &Shiffrin, A. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.
Schank, R. C., &Abelson, R. P. (1977).Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., &Bienkowski, M. (1982).Cognitive Psychology,14, 489–537.
Tabossi, P. (1988a). Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 324–340
Tabossi, P. (1988b). Effects of context on the immediate interpretation of ambiguous nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 153–162.
Underwood, B. J., &Schulz, R. W. (1960).Meaningfulness and verbal learning. New York: Lippincott.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant MH 16360 from the National Institute of Mental Health to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, D.L., Gee, N.R. & Schreiber, T.A. Sentence encoding and implicitly activated memories. Mem Cogn 20, 643–654 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202714
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202714