Abstract
Fletcher and Bloom (1988) have argued that as readers read narratives, clause by clause, they repeatedly focus their attention on the last preceding clause that contains antecedents but no consequences in the text. This strategy allows them to discover a causal path linking the text's opening to its final outcome while minimizing the number of times long-term memory must be searchedfor missing antecedents or consequences. In order to test this hypothesis, we examined the reading times of 25 subjects for each clause ofeight simple narrative texts. The results show that: (1) causal links between clauses that co-occur in short-term memory (as predicted by the strategy) increase the time required to read the second clause (2)-poten-tiaicausal links between clauses that never co-occur in short-term memory (again as predicted by the strategy) have no effect on reading time; and (3) reinstatement searches are initiated-at-the-end-of-sentences thatare causally unrelated to the contents of short-term memory or that contain clauses that satisf~, goals no longer in short-term memory. These results support the claim that subjects engage in a form of causal reasoning when they read simple narrative texts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Black, J. B., &Bower, G. H. (1980). Story understanding as problem solving.Poetics,9, 223–250.
Bovair, S., &Kieras, D. E, (1985). A guide to propositional analysis for research on technical prose. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.),Understanding expository text (pp. 315–362). Hilisdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Danks, J. H. (1986). Identifying component processes in text comprehension: Comment on Haberlandt and Graesser.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 193–197.
Fletcher, C. R. (1981). Short-term memory processes in text comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 564–574.
Fletcher, C. R. (1986). Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehension.JournalofMemory & Language,25, 43–58.
Fletcher, C. R., &Bloom, C. P. (1988). Causal reasoning in thecomprehension of simple narrative texts.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 235–244.
Graesser, A. C., &Riha, J. R. (1984). An application of multiple regression techniques to sentence reading times. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.),New methods in rending comprehension research (pp. 183–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Haberlandt, K., &Bingham, G. (1978). Verbs contribute to the coherence of brief narratives: Reading related and unrelated sentence triples.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 419–425.
Haberlandt, K. F., Graesser, A. C., Schneider, N. J., &Kiely, J. (1986). Effects of task and new arguments on word reading times.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 314–322.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Atheory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review,87, 329–354.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1984). Using eye fixations to study reading comprehension. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.),New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 151–182). Hifisdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., &Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in readingcomprehension.Journal ofExperimental Psychology: General,3, 228–238.
Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., &Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory.Journal of Memory & Language,23, 115–126.
Kieras, D. E. (1984). Amethod for comparing a simulation to reading timedata. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.),New,nethods in reading comprehension research (pp. 299–326). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Kieras, D. E., &Just, M. A. (Eds.) (1984).New methods in reading comprehension research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kintsch, W., &Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review,85, 363–394.
Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (in press). Regression analysis of repeated measures data: Acomparison of three different methods.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. Mackie, J. L. (1980). The cement of the universe: A study ofcausation. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Miller, J. R., &Kintsch, W. (1980). Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 335–354.
Myers, J. L. (in press). Causal relatedness and text comprehension. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.),Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Myers, J. L., Shinjo, M., &Duffy, S. A. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 453–465.
Newell, A., &Simon, H. A. (1972).Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
O'Brien, E. J., &Myers, J. L. (1987). The role ofcausal connections in the retrieval of text.Memory & Cognition,15, 419–427.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1982).Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Schank, R. (1975). The structure of episodes in memory. In D. G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (Eds.),Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 237–272). New York: Academic Press.
Suh, S. Y., & Trabasso, T. (1988, November).Convergent evidence on inferences during comprehension of text. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
Trabasso, T., &Sperry, L. L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 595–611.
Trabasso, T., &Van Den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events.Journal ofMemory & Language,24, 612–630.
Trabasso, T., Van Den Broek, P., &Suh, S. Y. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity ofcausal relations in stories.Discourse Processes,12, 1–25.
Turner, A., & Greene, E. (1978).Construction and use ofapropositional rextbase. (FromJSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, No. 1713).
Van Den Broek, P. (1988). The effects of causal relations and hierarchical position on the importance of story statements.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 1–22.
Van Den Broek, P. (in press). Causal inferences and the comprehension ofnarrativetexts. mA. C. Graesser & G. H, Bower(Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 24). New York: Academic Press.
Van Dijk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by the Center for Research in Learning, Perception, and Cognition at the University of Minnesota, and by Grants MH42468-Ol and AFOSR-86-0280 to Charles R. Fletcher. Portions of the research were presented at the 1987 convention of the Psychonomic Society in Seattle, WA.
—Accepted by previous editor, Alice F. Healy
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bloom, C.P., Fletcher, C.R., Van Den Broek, P. et al. An on-line assessment of causal reasoning during comprehension. Mem Cogn 18, 65–71 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202647
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202647