Abstract
The purpose of these experiments was to determine whether retrieval access in cued recall can be selectively restricted to a single domain of encoding when information has been encoded within two domains as different as word sound and word meaning. In Experiment 1, the subjects studied pairs of rhyming words differing in rhyme set size under verbal repetition or interactive-imagery instructions. Recall was cued with study-context rhymes, with extralist rhymes, or with extralist associates. The results indicated that rhyme set size and instructional effects were found no matter how recall was cued, indicating that both domains of encoding were always accessed. In Experiment 2, potential effects of study time and overt naming of the test cues were explored. These results indicated that both domains of encoding were accessed, except when long study times were available and subjects did not have to name the rhyme test cues Rhyme set size effects were eliminated under these conditions, suggesting that selective access to encoded meaning is possible in cued recall. Retrieval access in this task appears to be more controlled by domains of encoding than by information directly available in the cue, and access to encoded information can be restricted to a single domain.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 261–295.
Bahrick, H. P. (1970). Two-phase model for prompted recall.Psychological Review,77, 215–222.
Bower, G. H.,& Winzenz, D. (1970). Comparison of associative learning strategies.Psychonomic Science,20, 119–120.
Bugelski, B. R., Kidd, E., &Segmen, J. (1968). Image as a mediator in one-trial paired-associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 69–73.
Fisher, R. P., &Craik, F. I. M. (1977). Interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 701–711.
Graf, P., &Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568.
James, W. (1962).Psychology: Briefer course. New York: Collier Books. (Original work published 1890)
Joelson, J. M., &Herrmann, D. J. (1978). Properties of categories in semantic memory.American Journal of Psychology,91, 101–114.
McDaniel, M. A., &Masson, M. E. J. (1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, & Cognition,11, 371–385.
Nelson, D. L. (1981). Many are called but few are chosen: The influence of context on the effects of category size. InG. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation,15. New York: Academic Press.
Nelson, D. L. (1989). Implicitly activated knowledge and memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive psychology: The Tulane Flowerree Symposium on Cognition. New York: Erlbaum.
Nelson, D. L., Bajo, M. T., &Canas, J. (1987). Prior knowledge and memory: The episodic encoding of implicitly activated associates and rhymes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 54–63.
Nelson, D. L., Canas, J., Bajo, M. T., &Keelean, P. (1987). Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 542–552.
Nelson, D. L., &Friedrich, M. A. (1980). Encoding and cuing sounds and senses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 717–731.
Nelson, D. L., &McEvoy, C. L. (1979). Encoding context and set size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 292–314.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., &Friedrich, M. A. (1982). Extralist cuing and retrieval inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 89–105.
Nelson, D. L., Walling, J. R., &McEvoy, C. L. (1979). Doubts about depth.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 24–44.
Raaijmakers, J. G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. InD. S. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),Memory and cognitive processes: The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference (pp. 349–379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shiffrin, R. M. (1970). Memory search. InD. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press.
Toglia, M. P., &Battig, W. F. (1978).Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–372.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant MH 16360 from the National Institute of Mental Health to Douglas L. Nelson. Many thanks go to Elaine Georgilas for collecting the data for Experiment 2.
—Accepted by previous editor, Alice F. Healy
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McEvoy, C.L., Nelson, D.L. Selective access in cued recall: The roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding. Mem Cogn 18, 15–22 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202641
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202641