Abstract
Script actions that varied both in relevance to the script and in the expectancy of their details were developed. In Experiment 1, recall of these actions was tested. Actions of medium relevance were recalled better than actions of high or low relevance, whether or not details were presented. However, the unexpected details themselves were recalled better than the expected details. In Experiment 2, recognition was lowest for high-relevance actions but medium- and low-relevance actions did not differ. Actions with unexpected details were recognized better than actions with expected details, which tended to be better than generic actions. The results were interpreted as showing that both the relevance and the expectancy of the details in script actions are important in memory, but that the two dimensions may play different roles.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barsalou, L. W., &Sewell, D. R. (1985). Contrasting the representation of scripts and categories.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 646–665.
Bellezza, F. S. (1983). Recalling script-based text: The role of selective processing and schematic cues.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 267–270.
Bellezza, F. S., &Bower, G. H. (1982). Remembering script-based text.Poetics,11, 1–23.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Bowers, C. A.,& Stevens, D. T. (1984). Memory for prose: The influence of relational and proposition-specific processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 133–143.
Graesser, A. C., Gordon, S. E., &Sawyer, J. D. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities: Tests of a script pointer + tag hypothesis.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 319–332.
Graesser, A. C., &Nakamura, G. V. (1982). The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. InG. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 16, pp. 53–109). New York: Academic Press.
Graesser, A. C., Woll, S. B., Kowalski, D. J., &Smith, D. A. (1980). Memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activitiesPress.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 503–515.
Hastie, R. (1980). Memory for behavioral information that confirms or contradicts a personality impression. InR. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, E. B. Ebbesen, & R. S. Wyer (Eds.),Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception (pp. 155–177). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hemsley, G. D., &Marmurek, H. H. C. (1982). Person memory: The processing of consistent and inconsistent person information.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,8, 433–438.
Hunt, R. R., Ausley, J. A., &Schultz, E. E., Jr. (1986). Shared and item-specific information in memory for event descriptions.Memory & Cognition,14, 49–54.
Hunt, R. R., &Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 497–514.
Johnson, R. E. (1970). Recall of prose as a function of the structural importance of the linguistic units.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 12–20.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
Kintsch, W., Kozminsky, E., Streby, W. J., McKoon, G., &Keenan, J. M. (1975). Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 196–214.
Mandler, J. M. (1984).Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marmurek, H. H. C. (1984). Disposition-based categories: Structure and salience effects on memory.Journal of Research in Personality,18, 179–194.
Smith, D. A.,& Graesser, A. C. (1981). Memory for actions in scripted activities as a function of typicality, retention interval, and retrieval task.Memory & Cognition,9, 550–559.
Srull, T. K. (1981). Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 440–463.
Srull, T. K., Lichtenstein, M., &Rothbart, M. (1985). Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 316–345.
Srull, T. K., &Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1989). Person memory and judgment.Psychological Review,96, 58–83.
Taylor, S. E., &Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. InE. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.),Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wyer, R. S., Jr.,Bodenhausen, G. V., &Srull, T. K. (1984). The cognitive representation of persons and groups and its effect on recall and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,20, 445–469.
Wyer, R. S., Jr., &Gordon, S. E. (1984). The cognitive representation of social information. R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.),Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 73–150). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maki, R.H. Memory for script actions: Effects of relevance and detail expectancy. Mem Cogn 18, 5–14 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202640
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202640