Abstract
Four experiments were run to determine whether the interactive activation model would more accurately reflect the effect of context in letter perception by including word-to-letter inhibition resulting from word-to-word inhibition produced when multiple word units become active. The first three experiments found less accurate target letter discrimination in word than in nonword strings when a string was altered halfway through the exposure through adding or dropping a nontarget letter. The alteration changed a word to a different word or a nonword to a different nonword. Unaltered strings produced the typical word-superiority effect. The last experiment found an inverse relationship between target discrimination performance and the number of word substrings contained in each of a set of word quadrigrams that were individually exposed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Carr, T. H., Davidson, B. J., &Hawkins, H. L. (1978). Perceptual flexibility in word recognition: Strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 674–690.
Chastain, G. (1981). Phonological and orthographic factors in the word-superiority effect.Memory & Cognition,9, 389–397.
Chastain, G. (1982). Scanning, holistic encoding, and the word-superiority effect.Memory & Cognition,10, 232–236.
Estes, W. K. (1975). The locus of inferential and perceptual processes in letter identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2, 122–145.
Gummerman, K. (1972). A response-contingent measure of proportion correct.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,52, 1645–1647.
Healy, A. F., Oliver, W. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1982, November).Detecting letters in continuous text: Effects of display size. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MN.
Johnston, J. C. (1978). A test of the sophisticated guessing theory of word perception.Cognitive Psychology,10, 123–154.
Johnston, J. C. (1981). Effects of advance precuing of alternatives on the perception of letters alone and in words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 560–572.
Johnston, J. C., &McClelland, J. L. (1974) Perception of letters in words: Seek not and ye shall find.Science,184, 1192–1194.
Manelis, J. (1977). Frequency and meaningfulness in tachistoscopic word perception.American Journal of Psychology,99, 269–280.
McClelland, J. (1976). Preliminary letter Identification in the perception of words and nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,1, 80–91.
McClelland, J., &Johnston, J. C. (1977). The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 249–261.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
Paap, K. R., &Newsome, S. L. (1980). A perceptual-confusion account of the WSE in the target search paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 444–456.
Purcell, D. G., &Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Some boundary conditions for a word superiority effect.Quarterly Journal of experimental Psychology,34A, 117–134.
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 274–280.
Rumelhart, D. E., &McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review,89, 60–94.
Samuel, A. G., van Santen, J. P. H., &Johnston, J. C. (1982). Length effects in word perception: We is better than 1but worse than you or them.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,8, 91–105.
Taft, M. (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS).Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 21–39
Taft, M., &Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval or polymorphemic and polysyllabic words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 607–620.
Wheeler, D. (1970). Processes in word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,1, 59–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chastain, G. Word-to-letter inhibition: Word-inferiority and other interference effects. Mem Cogn 14, 361–368 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202515
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202515