Abstract
It has been frequently suggested that the ability to analyze spoken words into phonemes facilitates children’s learning of spelling-sound rules. This research attempts to demonstrate that link by showing that phonemic-analysis training helps children take advantage of spelling sound rules in learning to read. In two experiments, preschool and kindergarten prereaders participated in an analysis condition and a control condition on each of 4 test days. In the analysis condition, children learned to segment (and in Experiment 2, also to blend) selected spoken syllables. In the control condition, they merely repeated syllables. Children were then introduced to printed items that corresponded to the spoken syllables with which they had worked. The pronunciation of the “related” item could be deduced from those of other printed items in the set; the pronunciation of the “unrelated” item could not be so deduced. Both experiments revealed a significant interaction between condition (analysis vs. control) and item type (related vs. unrelated). In the control condition, children tended to make more errors on the related item than on the unrelated item; in the analysis condition, they tended to make fewer errors on the related item than on the unrelated item. These results suggest a causal link between the ability to analyze spoken syllables and the ability to benefit from spelling-sound relations in reading.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
Rosner, J.Phonic analysis training and beginning reading skills (Publication 1971/19). Pittsburgh: Learning Research and Developmental Center, 1971.
McNeil, J. D., & Coleman, J. C.Auditory discrimination training in the development of word analysis skills (Final Report, U.S. Office of Education Project No. 5-0503). Los Angeles: University of California, 1967.
Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I. L., & Hughes, C.Phonemic knowledge and learning to read. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, April 1981.
References
Baron, J. Mechanisms for pronouncing printed words: Use and acquisition. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Baron, J. Orthographic and word-specific mechanisms in children’s reading of words.Child Development, 1979,50, 60–72.
Baron, J., &Hodge, J. Using spelling-sound correspondences without trying to learn them.Visible Language, 1978,12, 55–70.
Baron, J., &Treiman, R. Use of orthography in reading and learning to read. In J. F. Kavanagh & R. L. Venezky (Eds.),Orthography, reading, and dyslexia. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1980.
Bloomfield, L. Linguistics and reading.Elementary English Review, 1942,19(1), 125–130; 183–186.
Boder, E. Developmental dyslexia: Prevailing diagnostic concepts and a new diagnostic approach. In H. R. Myklebust (Ed.),Progress in learning disabilities (Vol. 2). New York: Grune & Stratton, 1971.
Boder, E. Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1973,15, 663–687.
Brooks, L. R. Non-analytic correspondences and pattern in word pronunciation. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Calfee, R. C., Chapman, R. S., &Venezky, R. How a child needs to think to learn to read. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.),Cognition in learning and memory. New York: Wiley, 1972.
Calfee, R. C., Lindamood, P., &Lindamood, C. Acousticphonetic skills and reading—Kindergarten through twelfth grade.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973,64, 293–298.
Ehri, L. C., &Wilce, L. S. The mnemonic value of orthography among beginning readers.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979,71, 26–40.
Elkonin, D. B. Ussr. In J. Downing (Ed.),Comparative reading. New York: Macmillan, 1973.
Firth, I.Components of reading disability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, 1972.
Fox, B., &Routh, D. K. Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables and phonemes: A developmental study.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1975,4, 331–342.
Gleitman, L. R., &Rozin, P. The structure and acquisition of reading I: Relations between orthographies and the structure of language. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.),Toward a psychology of reading: The proceedings of the CUNY conferences. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Golinkoff, R. M. Phonemic awareness skills and reading achievement. In F. Murphy & J. Pikulski (Eds.),The acquisition of reading. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978.
Gough, P. B., &Hillinger, M. L. Learning to read: An unnatural act.Bulletin of the Orton Society, 1980,30, 179–196.
Hardy, M., Stennett, R. G.,&Smythe, P. C. Auditory segmentation and auditory blending in relation to beginning reading.Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1973,19, 144–158.
Helfgott, J. A. Phonemic segmentation and blending skills of kindergarten children: Implications for beginning reading acquisition.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1976,1, 157–169.
Horowitz, L. M. Associative matching and intralist similarity.Psychological Reports, 1962,10, 751–757.
Jusczyk, P. W. Rhymes and reasons: Some aspects of the child’s appreciation of poetic form.Developmental Psychology, 1977,13, 599–607.
Lewkowicz, N. K. Phonemic awareness training: What to teach and how to teach it.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980,72, 686–700.
Liberman, I., Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I., &Shankweiler, D. Orthography and the beginning reader. In J. F. Kavanagh & R. L. Venezky (Eds.),Orthography, reading, and dyslexia. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1980.
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., &Carter, B. Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974,15, 201–212.
McKay, D. G. The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech.Cognitive Psychology, 1972,3, 210–227.
McCutcheon, B. A., &McDowell, E. E. Intralist similarity and acquisition and generalization of word recognition.The Reading Teacher, 1969,23(2), 103–107; 115.
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., &Bertelson, P. Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously?Cognition, 1979,7, 323–331.
Otto, W., &Pizillo, C. Effect of intralist similarity on kindergarten pupils’ rate of word acquisition and transfer.Journal of Reading Behavior, 1970–1971,3, 14–19.
Rosner, J., &Simon, D. The Auditory Analysis Test: An initial report.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1971,4, 384–392.
Rozin, P., &Gleitman, L. R. The structure and acquisition of reading II: The reading process and the acquisition of the alphabetic principle. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.),Toward a psychology of reading: The proceedings of the CUNY conferences. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Samuels, S. J., &Jeffrey, W. E. Discriminability of words and letter cues used in learning to read.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1966,57, 337–340.
Snowling, M. J. The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1980,29, 294–305.
Treiman, R. The structure of spoken syllables: Evidence from novel word games.Cognition, in press.
Treiman, R., &Baron, J. Segmental analysis ability: Development and relation to reading ability. In G. E. MacKinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press, 1981.
Wallach, M. A., &Wallach, L. Helping disadvantaged children learn to read by teaching them phoneme identification skills. In L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver (Eds.),Theory and practice of early reading (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Williams, J. P. Teaching decoding with an emphasis on phoneme analysis and phoneme blending.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980,72, 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Treiman, R., Baron, J. Phonemic-analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules. Mem Cogn 11, 382–389 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202453
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202453