Abstract
This experiment investigates whether the influence of spelling-to-sound correspondence on lexical decision may be due to the visual characteristics of irregular words rather than to irregularities in their phonological correspondence. Lexical decision times to three types of word were measured: words with both irregular orthography and spelling-to-sound correspondence (e.g., GHOUL, CHAOS), words with regular orthography but irregular spelling-to-sound correspondence (e.g., GROSS, LEVER), and words regular in both respects (e.g., SHACK, PLUG). Items were presented in upper- and lowercase in order to examine the influence of “word shape” on any irregularity effects obtained. The results showed that irregular words with regular orthographies were identified more slowly than regular words in both upper- and lowercase. Words that are both orthographically and phonologically irregular were identified much more slowly with lowercase presentation. However, with uppercase, the lexical decision time for these items did not differ significantly from those of regular words. These data indicate that previous demonstrations of the regularity effect in lexical decision were not due to the unusual visual characteristics of some of the words sampled. In addition, the data emphasize the role of word shape in word recognition and also suggest that words with unique orthographies may be processed differently from those whose orthography is similar to other words.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bauer, D. W., &Stanovich, K. E. Lexical access and the spelling-to-sound regularity effect.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 424–432.
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., &Richman, B.The American heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1971.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-a-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 335–359.
Glushko, R. The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 674–691.
Kay, J., &Marcel, A. One process, not two, in reading words aloud: Lexical analogies do the work of non-lexical rules.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1981,33A, 397–413.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N.Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
Parkin, A. J. Phonological recoding and context.Current Psychological Research, 1982,2, 187–194. (a)
Parkin, A. J. Phonological recoding in lexical decision: Effects of spelling-to-sound regularity depend on how regularity is defined.Memory & Cognition, 1982,10, 43–53. (b)
Parkin, A. J., & Ellingham, R. Phonological recoding and lexical decision: The influence of pseudohomophones.Language and Speech, in press.
Taft, M. Prefix stripping revisited.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981,20, 289–297.
Underwood, G., &Bargh, K. Word shape, orthographic regularity and contextual interactions in a reading task.Cognition, 1982,12, 197–209.
Venezky, R. L.The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton, 1970.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was partially supported by Medical Research Council Grant G/978/l173/N awarded to G. Underwood.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parkin, A.J., Underwood, G. Orthographic vs. phonological irregularity in lexical decision. Mem Cogn 11, 351–355 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202449
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202449