Abstract
Theories of visual word recognition have proposed that a word’s phonological properties can be involved in reading visually presented words. Further, it is commonly supposed that this phonological information can be arrived at in at least two ways: (1) by looking it up after identifying the word visually (a lexical route) or (2) by rule-governed translating of the word’s orthographic code (a nonlexical route), Four experiments were conducted to examine whether phonological information is automatically accessed in visual word recognition, and, if so, how this occurs. A priming technique was used with a display sequence of mask, prime, target, mask. Subjects were asked to make written responses to any words that they thought were present, and prime identification was minimal. A facilitatory effect of phonological priming on target identification occurred when primes were homophones of targets. However, no similar facilitation occurred when the prime was a nonword homophone of the target. Further, the homophone priming effect was found irrespective of whether targets followed the spelling-to-sound rules of English. The results suggest that automatic access to phonology can occur in visual word recognition and that it operates by means of a lexical route.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
1. Coltheart, M., Masterson, J., Byng, S., Prior, M., & Riddoch, J.Surface dyslexia. Manuscript in preparation, 1981.
2. Meyer, D. E., & Gutschera, K. D.Orthographic versus phonemic processing of printed words. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Denver, November 1975.
References
Allport, D. A. On knowing the meaning of words we are unable to report: The effects of visual masking. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI. Potomac, Md: Erlbaum, 1977.
Allport, D. A., & Funnell, E. Components of the mental lexicon.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1981.
Baron, J., &Strawson, C. Use of orthographic and word specific knowledge in reading words aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 386–393.
Bauer, D. W., &Stanovich, K. E. Lexical access and the spelling-to-sound regularity effect.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 424–432.
Carr, T. H., Davidson, B. J., &Hawkins, H. L. Perceptual flexibility in word recognition: Strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, 674–690.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,11, 335–359.
Coltheart, M. Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies of information processing. London: Academic Press, 1978.
Coltheart, M. Reading, phonological recoding, and deep dyslexia. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Deep dyslexia. London: Routledle & Kegan Paul, 1980.
Coltheart, M., Jonasson, J. T., Davelaar, E., &Besner, D. Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI. Potomac, Md: Erlbaum, 1977.
Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., &Jonasson, J. Phonological recoding and lexical access.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 391–402.
Ellis, A. W., &Marshall, J. C. Semantic errors or statistical flukes? A note on Allport’s “On knowing the meaning of words we are unable to report.”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978,30, 569–575.
Evett, L. J., &Humphreys, G. W. The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1981,33A, 325–350.
Forster, K. I. Accessing the internal lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),New approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1976.
Fowler, C. A., Wolford, G., Slade, R., &Tassinary, L. Lexical access with and without awareness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1981,110, 341–362.
Glushko, R. The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 674–691.
Gough, P. B., &Cosky, M. J. One second of reading again. In N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts (Eds.),Cognitive theory (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Hawkins, H. L., Reicher, G. M., Rogers, M., &Peterson, L. Flexible coding in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 380–385.
Hillinger, M. L. Priming effects with phonemically similar words: The encoding-bias hypothesis reconsidered.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 115–123.
Humphreys, G. W. Direct vs. indirect tasks of the information available from masked displays: What visual masking does and does not prevent.British Journal of Psychology, 1981,72, 323–330.
Johnston, J. C., &McClelland, J. L. Experimental tests of a hierarchical model of word identification.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980,19, 503–535.
Kay, J., &Marcel, A. J. One process, not two, in reading aloud: Lexical analogies do the work of noniexical rules.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1981,33A, 397–414.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N.Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
Logan, G. D. Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data.Cognitive Psychology, 1980,11, 523–553.
Marcel, A. J. Surface dyslexia and beginning reading: A revised hypothesis of the pronunciation of print and its impairments. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.
Marcel, A. J. Conscious and unconscious perception: Visual masking, word recognition and an approach to consciousness.Cognitive Psychology, in press.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review, 1981,5, 375–407.
McLean, J. P., &Shulman, G. L. On the construction and maintenance of expectancies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978,30, 441–454.
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 309–321.
Michaels, C. F., &Turvey, M. T. Central sources of visual masking: Indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance.Psychological Research, 1979,41, 1–61.
Morton, J., &Patterson, K. A new attempt at an interpretation, or, an attempt at a new interpretation. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.
Neely, J. H. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: The roles of inhibitioniess spreading activation and limited capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1977,106, 226–254.
Posner, M. I.Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Rayner, K. The control of eye movements in reading: Eye guidance and visual integration. In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.),The processing of visible language 1. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., &Rubenstein, M. A. Evidence for phonemic receding in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971,10, 645–658.
Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., &Scarborough, H. S. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 1–17.
Scarborough, D. L., Gerard, L., &Cortese, C. Accessing lexical memory: The transfer of word repetition effects across task and modality.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 3–12.
Schwartz, M. F., Marin, O. S. M., &Saffran, E. M. Dissociations of language function in dementia: A case study.Brain and Language, 1979,7, 277–306.
Shulman, H. G., Hornak, R., &Sanders, E. The effects of graphemic, phonetic, and semantic relationships on access to lexical structures.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 115–123.
Stanovich, K. E., &Bauer, D. W. Experiments on the spelling-to-sound regularity effect in word recognition.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 410–415.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Flanigan, H. P., &Seidenberg, M. S. Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 513–520.
Taylor, D. E.Automatic processes in word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bristol University, 1981.
Taylor, G. A., &Chabot, R. J. Differential backward masking of words and letters by masks of varying orthographic structure.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 629–635.
Turvey, M. T. Visual processing of short-term memory. In W. K. Estes (Bd.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 5). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Venezky, R. L.The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton Press, 1970.
Wike, E. L., &Church, J. D. Comments on Clark’s “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy.”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976,15, 249–255.
Williams, P. C., &Parkin, A. J. On knowing the meaning of words we are unable to report: Confirmation of a guessing explanation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1980,32, 101–108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Humphreys, G.W., Evett, L.J. & Taylor, D.E. Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition. Mem Cogn 10, 576–590 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202440
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202440