Abstract
Three experiments were conducted to explore the “automatic” encoding of information about presentation modality and the use of such information during word retrieval. Children (Grades 2, 3, and 6) and adults (college students) were asked to attend to a mixed-modality (auditory and visual) list of nouns, then to recall the target words, and finally to identify the presentation modality of each word on a recognition list. Instructions (incidental vs. intentional), list length, and list organization (unrelated words vs. words from taxonomic categories) were varied across the experiments. Although these manipulations affected the recall of target words, they did not change the amount of modality information retained, which was clearly above chance in all three experiments. As predicted by the Hasher and Zacks (1979) model for automatic processing, there were no developmental changes on memory for modality, instructions to remember modality information had no effect on modality identification, and a tradeoff between word recall and modality identification rarely occurred.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atwood, G. An experimental study of visual imagination and memory.Cognitive Psychology, 1971,2, 290–299.
Bray, N. W., &Batchelder, W. H. Effects of instructions and retention interval on memory of presentation mode.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 367–374.
Cumming, G., &Coltheart, M. Short-term memory: Are item and position information stored independently?Psychonomic Science, 1969,15, 216–218.
Frankel, F., &Cole, M. Measures of category clustering in free recall.Psychological Bulletin, 1971,76, 39–44.
Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1979,108, 356–388.
Hintzman, D. L., Block, R. A., &Inskeep, N. R. Memory for mode of input.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 741–749.
Howell, W. C. Storage of events and event frequencies: A comparison of two paradigms in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,911, 260–263.
Kall, R.The development of memory in children. San Francisco: Freeman, 1979.
Kirsner, K. Modality differences in recognition memory for words and their attributes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 579–584.
Lehman, E. B., &Hanzel, S. H. A developmental study of memory for presentation modality.Journal of General Psychology, 1981,105, 155–164.
Light, L. L., &Berger, D. E. Memory for modality: Within-modality discrimination is not automatic.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 854–860.
Madigan, S., &Doherty, L. Retention of item attributes in free recall.Psychonomic Science, 1972,17, 233–235.
Mandler, J. M., Seegmiller, D., &Day, J. On the coding of spatial information.Memory & Cognition, 1977,5, 10–16.
Mathews, M. E., &Fozard, J. L. Age differences in judgments of recency for short sequences of pictures.Developmental Psychology, 1970,3, 208–217.
Moely, B. E., Olson, F. A., Halwes, T. G., &Flavell, J. H. Production deficiency in young children’s clustered recall.Developmental Psychology, 1969,1, 26–34.
Murdock, B. B., Jr., &Walker, K. D. Modality effects in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 665–676.
Nilsson, L. Organization by modality in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,100, 246–253.
Park, D. C., Puglisi, J. T., &Lutz, R. Spatial memory in older adults: Effects of intentionality.Journal of Gerontology, 1982,37, 330–335.
Penney, C. G. Modality effects in short-term verbal memory.Psychological Bulletin, 1975,82, 68–84.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 352–373.
Underwood, B. J. Attributes of memory.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 559–573.
von Wright, J. M., Gebhard, P., &Karttunen, M. A developmental study of the recall of spatial location.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1975,20, 181–190.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a university research grant to the author from George Mason University. Portions of this paper were presented at meetings of the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore, Maryland, April 1982.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lehman, E.B. Memory for modality: Evidence for an automatic process. Mem Cogn 10, 554–564 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202438
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202438