Advertisement

MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory

  • Douglas L. Hintzman
Session III Invited Address

Abstract

An overview of a simulation model of human memory is presented. The model assumes: (1) that only episodic traces are stored in memory, (2) that repetition produces multiple traces of an item, (3) that a retrieval cue contacts all memory traces simultaneously, (4) that each trace is activated according to its similarity to the retrieval cue, and (5) that all traces respond in parallel, the retrieved information reflecting their summed output. The model has been applied with success to a variety of phenomena found with human subjects in frequency and recognition judgment tasks, the schema-abstraction task, and paired-associate learning. Application of the model to these tasks is briefly summarized.

Keywords

Memory Trace Primary Memory Secondary Memory Recognition Judgment Category Exemplar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bower, G. H. (1961). Application of a model to paired-associate learning.Psychometrika,26, 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brewer, W. F., &Pani, J. R. (1983). The structure of human memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 17). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Eich, J. M. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model.Psychological Review,89, 627–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elio, R., &Anderson, J. R. (1981). The effects of category generalizations and instance similarity on schema abstraction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,7, 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 356–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hinton, G. E., &Anderson, J. A. (1981).Parallel models of associative memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Hintzman, D. L. (1969). Apparent frequency as a function of frequency and the spacing of repetitions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hintzman, D. L., &Block, R. A. (1971). Repetition and memory: Evidence for a multiple-trace hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology,88, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hintzman, D. L., &Gold, E. (1983). A congruity effect in the discrimination of presentation frequencies: Some data and a model.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 11–14.Google Scholar
  10. Hintzman, D. L., Grandy, C. A., &Gold, E. (1981). Memory for frequency: A comparison of two multiple-trace theories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,7, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hintzman, D. L., &Ludlam, G. (1980). Differential forgetting of prototypes and old instances: Simulation by an exemplar-based classification model.Memory & Cognition,8, 378–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hintzman, D. L., Nozawa, G., &Irmscher, M. (1982). Frequency as a nonpropositional attribute of memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,21, 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hintzman, D. L., &Stern, L. D. (in press). A comparison of forgetting rates in frequency discrimination and recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society.Google Scholar
  14. Homa, D., Cross, J., Cornell, D., Goldman, D., &Schwartz, S. (1973). Prototype abstraction and classification of new instances as a function of number of instances defining the prototype.Journal of Experimental Psychology,101, 116–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Homa, D., Sterling, S., &Trepel, L. (1981). Limitations of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,7, 418–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Homa, D., &Vosburoh, R. (1976). Category breadth and the abstraction of prototypical information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,2, 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Wang, A. Y., &Taylor, T. H. (1979). Fact and fantasy: The roles of accuracy and variability in confusing imaginations with perceptual experiences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,5, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Posner, M. I., &Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 353–363.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Posner, M. I., &Keele, S. W. (1970). Retention of abstract ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 304–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosch, E., &Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology,7, 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Semon, R. (1923).Mnemic psychology. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, E. E., &Medin, D. L. (1981).Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas L. Hintzman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OregonEugene

Personalised recommendations