Abstract
Four memory scanning experiments investigated the effect of the probability of occurrence of one case of a letter (e.g., “A”) on response time to the other case of that same letter (“a”). There was no effect: Responses to one case of a letter did not depend on the probability of occurrence of the other case of the letter. This finding indicates that facilitation of visual encoding by high probability of occurrence is not caused by increased activation at the level of the name code. Previous results rule out the possibility that facilitation occurs at the level of feature detectors responding to the individual visual features of the high-probability stimuli, and these results were replicated in the present experiments. It appears that facilitation is caused by activation along specific routes by which visual features activate letter names. This conclusion has implications for the locus of effect of stimulus probability in models of letter coding
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference notes
Wattenbarger, B.The representation of the stimulus in character classification (Tech. Rep. 22). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Human Performance Center, 1970.
Theios, J.The locus of cognition. Paper presented at (he 13th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, Missouri, November 1972.
Rumelhart, D.A multicomponent theory of confusion among briefly exposed alphabetic characters (Rep. 22). San Diego: University of California, Center for Human Information Processing, 1971.
References
Atkinson, R. C., &Juola, J. F. Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Besner, D. Character classification: Levels of processing and the effects of stimulus probability.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977,9, 337–339.
Chase, W., &Calfee, R. Modality and similarity effects in short-term recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,81, 510–514.
Conrad, R. Acoustic confusion and immediate memory.British Journal of Psychology, 1964,55, 75–84.
Dainoff, M. J. Time course of visual and auditory encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,86, 214–224.
Geller, E. Latencies to name one of three stimulus dimensions: A study of probability effects and dimension integrality.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,22, 70–76.
Geller, E., Whitman, C., &Post, D. Stimulus probability and prediction outcome as determinant of choice reaction time: Some procedural considerations.Acta Psychologica, 1973,37, 1–14.
Gough, P. One second of reading. In J. Kavanagh & I. Mattingly (Eds.),Language by ear and eye. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1972.
Hardzinski, M., &Pachella, R. The manipulation of visual quality and the definition of stimulus encoding operations ill memory scanning experiments.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980,27, 232–240.
Hawkins, H., Mackay, S., Holley, S., Friedin, B., &Cohen, S. Locus of the relative frequency effect in choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,101, 90–99.
Keele, S. W.Attention and human performance. Pacific Palisades, Calif: Goodyear, 1973.
Massaro, D.Experimental psychology and information processing. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1975.
McClelland, J. Letter and configuration information in word identification.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977,16, 137–150.
McClelland, J., &Johnston, J. The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,22, 249–261.
Miller, J. Cognitive influences on perceptual processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 546–562.
Miller, J.,&Pachella, R. On the locus of the stimulus probability effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,101, 227–231.
Miller, J., &Pachella, R. Encoding processes in memory scanning tasks.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 501–506.
Morton, J. Interaction of information in word recognition.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 165–178.
Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
Pachella, R. The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.
Pachella, R., &Miller, J. Stimulus probability and same-different classification.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 29–34.
Posner, M., Boles, S., Eichelman, W., & Taylor, R. Retention of visual and name codes of single letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,79(1, Pt. 2).
Posner, M., &Keele, S. W. Decay of visual information from a single letter.Science, 1967,158, 137–139.
Posner, M., &Snyder, C. Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Rumelhart, D. E. A multicomponent theory of the perception of briefly exposed displays.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1970,7, 191–218.
Scarborough, D., Cortese, C., &SCarborough, H. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Ps.vchology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 1–77.
Scarborogh, D., Gerard, L., &Cortese, C. Accessing lexical memory: The transfer of word repetition effects across task and modality.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 3–12.
Seamon, J., &Wright, C. Generative processes in character classification: Evidence for a probe encoding set.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 96–102.
Siple, P.Auditory and visual representation in short-term recognition memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at San Diego, 1975.
Smith, E., &Spoehr, K. The perception of printed English: A theoretical perspective. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Potomac, Md: Erlbaum, 1974.
Spector, A., &Lyons, R. The locus of stimulus probability effect in choice reaction time.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976,7, 519–521.
Sperling, G. Successive approximations to a model for short-term memory.Acta Psychologica, 1967,27, 285–292.
Stanovich, K., &Pachella, R. The effect of stimulus probability on the speed and accuracy of naming alphanumeric stimuli.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976,8, 281–284.
Sternberg, S. Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments.American Scientist, 1969,57, 421–457.
Theios, J., Smith, P., Haviland, S., Traupmann, J., &MOY, M. Memory scanning as a serial, self-terminating process.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,97, 323–336.
Thompson, M., &Massaro, D. Visual information and redundancy in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,98, 49–54.
Turvey, M. On peripheral and central processes m vision: Inferences from an information processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 1–52.
Wickelgren, W. A. Acoustic similarity and intrusion errors in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965.70, 102–108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by NSF Grant BNS-7824772 to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, J., Hardzinski, M. Case specificity of the stimulus probability effect. Mem Cogn 9, 205–216 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202336
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202336