Abstract
A previously proposed expectancy hypothesis predicts that the semantic congruity effect typically observed in symbolic comparison tasks will be eliminated when the items to be compared are presented prior to the comparative. Previous studies testing this hypothesis have been inconclusive. The present experiments demonstrate that a semantic congruity effect can be obtained when the comparative follows the pair after a 1-sec (Experiment 1) or 4-sec (Experiment 2) delay. Lexical markedness effects were also obtained. The key to producing a “comparative-after” congruity effect is to intermix questions about several different dimensions, so that when the pair is presented, subjects will be unable to anticipate the question. The results disconfirm the expectancy hypothesis.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference notes
Holyoak, K. J., & Mah, W. A.Cognitive reference points in judgments of symbolic magnitude. Manuscript in preparation, 1981.
Marschark, M. Personal communication, September 1980.
Banks, W. P. Personal communication, April 1979.
References
Banks, W. P. Encoding and processing of symbolic information in comparative judgments. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press, 1977.
Banks, W. P., &FLORA, J. Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 278–290.
Banks, W. P., Fuji, M., &KAYRA-STUART, F. Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitudes of digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 435–447.
Banks, W. P., &Root, M. Semantic congruity effects in judgments of loudness.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,26, 133–142.
Bock, R. D., &Jones, L. V.The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1968.
Buckley, P. B., &Gillman, C. B. Comparisons of digits and dot patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 1131–1136.
Clark, H. H. Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 387–404.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,11, 335–359.
Clark, H. H., Carpenter, P. A., &Just, M. A. On the meeting of semantics and perception. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Glass, A. L., Holyoak, K. J., &Kiger, J. I. Role of antonymy relations in semantic judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979,5, 598–606.
Holyoak, K. J.Symbolic processes in mental comparisons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1976.
Holyoak, K. J. The form of analog size information in memory.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 31–51.
Holyoak, K. J. Comparative judgments with numerical reference points.Cognitive Psychology, 1978,10, 293–243.
Holyoak, K. J., Glass.A. L., &Mah, W. A. Morphological structure and semantic retrieval.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976,15, 235–247.
Holyoak, K. J., &Walker, J. H. Subjective magnitude information in semantic ordering.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976,15, 287–299.
Jamieson, D. G., &Petrusic, W. M. Relational judgments with remembered stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 373–378.
John, I. D. A common mechanism mediating the time-order error and the crossover effect in comparative judgments of loudness.Australian Journal of Psychology, 1975,27, 51–60.
Kosslyn, S. M., MURPHY, G. L., Bemesderfer, M. E., &Feinstein, K. J. Category and continuum in mental comparisons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1977,106, 341–375.
Loftus, E. F. Category dominance, instance dominance, and categorization time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,97, 70–74.
Marscuark, M., &Paivio, A. Semantic congruity and lexical marking in symbolic comparisons: An expectancy hypothesis.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 175–184.
Meyer, D. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,90, 227–334.
Meyer, D. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes.Science, 1976,192, 27–33.
Meyer, R. S., &Dumais, S. T. Mental comparison. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol 12). New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Moyer, R. S., &Landauer, T. K. Time required for judgments of numerical inequality.Nature, 1967,215, 1519–1520.
Nisbett, R. E., &WilsoN, T. D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 1977,114, 231–259.
Paivio, A. Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 635–647.
Paivio, A. Mental comparisons involving abstract attributes.Memory& Cognition, 1978,6, 199–208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant5-R01-MH33278-02 to Keith Holyoak.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holyoak, K.J., Mah, W.A. Semantic congruity in symbolic comparisons: Evidence against an expectancy hypothesis. Mem Cogn 9, 197–204 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202335
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202335