Abstract
The effects of search criteria upon recall performance following a word classification task were investigated. Rival hypotheses were tested, one based on the number of cues available at retrieval and the other on the amount of processing carried out during classification. After being presented with two-component category names, subjects classified words on the basis of either category membership or the number of semantic components the words shared with a target category, and then they received an unexpected recall test. Experiment 1 favored an amount-of-processing explanation, but it was felt that redundancy in the stimulus materials might invalidate this conclusion. Experiment 2 confirmed this suspicion and clearly supported an explanation in terms of retrieval cue availability. The notion of partial semantic processing of words is discussed, and it is argued that the number of congruent encodings formed during classification can be used as an index of elaboration and subsequent memory performance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 268–294.
Frase, L. T., &Kammann, R. Effects of search criterion upon unanticipated free recall of categorically related words.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 181–184.
Jacoby, L. L., &Craik, F. I. M. Effects of elaboration of processing at encoding and retrieval: Trace distinctiveness and recovery of initial context. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Gibbs, G., &Demowbray, J. Meaning, amount of processing, and memory for words.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 372–375.
Jones, G. V. Analyzing memory by cuing: Intrinsic and extrinsic knowledge. In N. S. Sutherland (Ed.),Tutorial essays in psychology: A guide to recent advances. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Klein, G. S. Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming.American Journal of Psychology, 1964,77, 576–588.
Klein, K., &Saltz, E. Specifying the mechanisms in a levels-of-processing approach to memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 671–679.
Kucera, H., &Francts, W. N.Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
Nelson, D. L. Remembering pictures and words: Appearance, significance and name. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Schulman, A. I. Memory for words recently classified.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 47–52.
Stein, B. S., Morriss, C. D., &Bransford, J. D. Constraints on effective elaboration.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978,17, 707–714.
Stroop, J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935,18, 643–662.
Tulving, E. Relation between encoding specificity and levels of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McClelland, A.G.R., Rawles, R.E. & Sinclair, F.E. The effects of search criteria and retrieval cue availability on memory for words. Mem Cogn 9, 164–168 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202331
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202331