Abstract
Two studies were performed using monaural presentation of verbal material to test for a right-ear advantage (REA) in recall. It was hypothesized that a delayed recall task and examination of the serial position curve would be a more sensitive test for ear asymmetries than those used in previous studies. In Experiment 1, 30 right-handed male subjects were given lists of words to recall, presented to either the left or right ear, with language chatter, baroque music, or no stimulus concurrently presented to the opposite ear. Both immediate and delayed recall were assessed. The results indicated that the strongest REAs appeared in delayed recall. Moreover, the REAs occurred regardless of the stimulus conditions co-occurring in the other ear. Experiment 2 was done to test whether the REAs in the delayed recall were due to rehearsal biases. Twenty-four right-handed male subjects recalled lists of words with standard instructions and instructions to recall in the reverse order of input (limiting rehearsal). The results indicated that the backward instructions limited and controlled rehearsal and, hence, input to long-term storage; the REAs occurred in delayed recall under all instructional conditions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, R. C., &Shiffrin, R. M. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),Advances in the psychology of learning and motivation research and theory (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1968.
Bakker, D. Left-right differences in auditory perception of verbal and nonverbal material by children.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,19, 334–336.
Bakker, D., &Boeijima, J. A. Ear order effects on ear asymmetry with monaural stimulation.Neuropsychologia, 1970,8, 385–396.
Bartz, W. H., Satz, P., Fennell, E., &LALLY, J. R. Meaningfulness and laterality in dichotic listening.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,74, 204–210.
Bever, T. G. The nature of cerebral dominance in speech behavior of the child and adult. In R. Huxley & E. Ingram (Eds.),Language acquisition models and methods. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Bever, T. G., Hurlig, R. R., &Handel, A. B. Analytic processing elicits right ear superiority in monaurally presented speech.Neuropsychologia, 1976,14, 175–181.
Blumstein, S., Goodglass, H., &Tartter, V. The reliability of ear advantage in dichotic listening.Brain and Language, 1975,2, 226–236.
Broadbent, D. E. Successive responses to simultaneous stimuli.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956,8, 145–162.
Bryden, M. P. Order of report in dichotic listening.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1961,16, 291–299.
Bryden, M. P. Tachistoscopic recognition, handedness, and cerebral dominance.Neuropsychologia, 1965,3, 1–8.
Craik, F. I. M. The fate of primacy memory items in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970,9, 143–148.
Dirks, D. Perception of dichotic and monaural verbal material and cerebral dominance for speech.Acta Otolaryngologica, 1964,58, 73–80.
Frankfurter, A., &Honeck, R. P. Ear differences in the recall of monaurally presented sentences.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,25, 138–146.
Freides, D. Do dichotic listening procedures measure lateralization of information processing or retrieval strategy?Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,21, 259–263.
Glanzer, M., &Koppenaal, L. The effect of encoding tasks on free recall: Stages and levels.Journal of Verbal Learning and VerbalBehavior, 1977,16, 21–28.
Inglis, J. Dichotic listening and cerebral dominance.Acta Otolaryngologica, 1965,60, 231–237.
Kimura, D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1961,15, 166–171.
Kimura, D. Left-right differences in the perception of melodies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,16, 335–338.
Kimura, D. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening.Cortex, 1967,3, 163–178.
Kimura, D. Spatial localization in left and right visual fields.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1969,23, 445–458.
Milner, B., TAYLOR, L., &Sperry, R. W. Lateralized suppression of dichotically-presented digits after commissured section in man.Science, 1968,161, 184–185.
Nagafuchi, M. Development of dichotic and monaural hearing abilities in young children.Acta Otolaryngologica, 1970,69, 409–415.
Oxbury, S., Oxbury, J., &Gardiner, J. Laterality effects in dichotic listening.Nature, 1968,214, 742.
Pizzamiglio, L., Depascalis, C., &Vignatti, A. Stability of dichotic listening test.Cortex, 1974,10, 203–205.
Richardson, D. H., &Knight, K. M. A bibliography in dichotic listening.Cortex, 1970,6, 236–240.
Rosenwe I G, M. R. Representation of the two ears at the auditory cortex.American Journal of Physiology, 1957,167, 147–158.
Satz, P. Laterality effects in dichotic listening: A reply.Nature, 1968,218, 277–278.
Satz, P., Achenbach, L., Pattershall, E., &Fennell, E. Order of report, ear asymmetry, and handedness in dichotic listening.Cortex, 1965,1,377–396.
Sparks, R., &Geschwind, N. Dichotic listening in man after section of neocortical commissures.Cortex, 1968,4, 3–16.
Sperry, R. W., Gazzaniga, M. S., &Bogen, J. E. Inter-hemispheric relationships: The neocortical commissures, syndromes of hemisphere disconnection. In P. J. Vinken & J. M. Sprague (Eds.),Handbook of clinical neurology (Vol. 4). Amsterdam: North Holland, 1967.
Studdert-Kennedy, M. Two questions.Brain and Language, 1975,2, 123–130.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I.The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University Press, 1944.
Tulving, E., &Arbuckle, T. Y. Input and output interference in short-term associative memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,72, 145–150.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
These studies were supported by Grant RO3-MH32886-01 from the National Institute of Mental Health, USDHEW, to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bohannon, J.N., Baker-Ward, L. Right-ear advantage and delayed recall. Mem Cogn 9, 115–120 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202325
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202325