Abstract
Considering an interactive computer as a social stimulus suggests that contemporary social psychological theories can contribute to the prediction of user attitude and performance. In order to assist in the systematic exploration of this possibility, we developed DIALOGUE, an on-line system to investigate the effects of varying the computer’s responses to the user. This system involves a presentation program that displays the computer’s responses, performs the pacing of video information, and collects a variety of measurements, including the user’s response time and the number of correct/incorrect user responses. DIALOGUE also includes a data manager that allows the experimenter to examine or modify the information collected by the presentation program. Utilizing DIALOGUE, we conducted a preliminary investigation of one aspect of human-computer interaction, the effects of varying the degree of human-like responses exhibited by the computer. Results suggest that (1) there are underlying dimensions of judgment involving perception of interactive computers, (2) a manipulation of human-like computer responses is reflected primarily in certain of these dimensions, and (3) such a manipulation influences user performance and feelings of responsibility. Factors related to the implementation of DIALOGUE are considered, and its potential for investigations of a variety of human-computer interactions is discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allport, G. The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
Cacioppo, J. T., &Petty, R. E. Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.),Cognitive assessment. New York: Guilford Press, 1981.
Geen, R. G., &Gange, J. J. Drive theory of social facilitation: Twelve years of theory and research.Psychological Bulletin, 1977,84, 1267–1288.
Habtley, J. R. Computer-assisted learning. In H. T. Smith & T. R. G. Green (Eds.),Human interaction with computers. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
Heider, F. Social perception and phenomenal causality.Psychological Review, 1944,51, 358–374.
Kelley, H. H., &Michela, J. L. Attribution theory and research.Annual Review of Psychology, 1980,31, 457–501.
Kim, J., &Mueller, C. W.Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-014). Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, 1978.
Klecka, W. R.Discriminant analysis (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-019). Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, 1980.
Letton, L. A.Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1979.
Meyer, J. P. Causal attribution for success and failure: A multi-variate investigation of dimensionality, formation, and consequences.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980,38, 704–718.
Phyoe, J. B.,&Kriss, M. The cognitive dynamics of salience in the attribution process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977,35, 49–55.
Rapheal, B.The thinking computer. San Francisco: Freeman, 1976.
Shneiderman, B.Software psychology: Human factors in computers and information systems. Cambridge, Mass: Winthrop, 1980.
Smith, H. T., &Green, T. R. G. (Eds.),Human interaction with computers. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
Weiner, B. An attributional interpretation of expectancy-value theory. In B. Weiner (Ed.),Cognitive views of human motivation. San Francisco: Academic Press, 1974.
Weiner, B.Human motivation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1980.
Weizenbaum, J.Computer power and human reason. San Francisco: Freeman, 1976,
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to express their appreciation to Alice Gallagher and Joan MeCurdy for assistance during collection and reduction of the experimental data and to James Wilmes of the Computing Center staff at the University of Notre Dame for his helpful assistance with portions of the software. This paper was supported in part by a grant from the Notre Dame Graduate Student Union.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quintana, L.R., Crowell, C.R., Pryor, J.B. et al. Human-computer interaction: A preliminary social psychological analysis. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 14, 210–220 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202155
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202155