Advertisement

Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 430–434 | Cite as

Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris)

  • Samuel H. Gruber
  • Neil Schneiderman
Methods & Designs

Abstract

An experimental group of lemon sharks received 100 daily presentations of light flash as the conditioned stimulus (CS) and electric shock as the unconditioned stimulus (US) in a classical conditioning situation. The conditioned responses (CRs) and unconditioned responses (URs) under observation consisted of extensions of the nictitating membrane. Separate control groups received either (a) no CS or US, (b) CS-alone, or (c) completely random presentations of CS and US. Few CRs occurred in the experimental group at the outset of conditioning, but the percentage of CRs during the second half of the first acquisition session exceeded 95%. Conditioning stabilized above 95% CRs during Acquisition Sessions 3 through 7. These responses could not be attributed to pseudoconditioning, sensitization, or other nonassociative factors. When the experimental group was subsequently given six CS-alone sessions, the course of extinction was gradual. Most results seemed similar to those previously obtained during classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane in rabbits.

Keywords

Conditioned Stimulus Unconditioned Stimulus Classical Conditioning Nictitate Membrane Extinction Session 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aronson, L. R., Aronson, F. R., &Clark, E. Instrumental conditioning and light-dark discrimination in young nurse sharks.Bulletin of Marine Science, 1967,17, 249–256.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, E. Instrumental conditioning of lemon sharks.Science, 1959,130, 217–218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gilbert, P. W., &Oren, M. E. The selachiannictitans and subocular fold.Copeia, 1964,3, 534–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gormezano, I. Classical conditioning. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.),Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966, 385–420.Google Scholar
  5. Gormezano, I., Schneiderman, N., Deaux, E., &Fuentes, I. Nictitating membrane: Classical conditioning and extinction in the albino rabbit.Science, 1962,138, 33–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Graeber, R. C., &Ebbeson, S. D. E. Visual discrimination learning in normal and tectal-ablated nurse sharks (Ginglvmostoma cirratum).Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 1972,40, 121–139.Google Scholar
  7. Grant, D. A. A sensitized eyelid reaction m relation to the conditioned eyelid response.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1945,35, 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grant, D. A., &Norris, E. B. Eyelid conditioning as influenced by the presence of sensitized beta-responsesJournal of Experimental Psychology, 1947,37, 423–433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gruber, S. H., Hamasaki, D. I., &Bridges, C. D. B. Cones in the retina of the lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris).Vision Research, 1963,3, 9–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamasaki, D. I., &Grlber, S. H. The photoreceptors of the nurse shark.Ginglvmostoma ctrratum and the sting ray.Dasvatus sari, Bulletin of Marine Science, 1965,15, 1051–1059.Google Scholar
  11. Müller, J. Untersuchungen uber die Eingeweide der Fische. Schluts der vergleichenden Anatomie der Myxinoiden.Abhandlungen der Koniglichen Akademe der Wissenschaften Zu Berlin. Pp. 109–170. 1843.Google Scholar
  12. Nelson, D. R. Hearing thresholds, frequency discriminations and acoustic orientation in the lemon shark.Negaprion brevirostris (Poey).Bulletin of Marine Science, 1967,17, 741–768.Google Scholar
  13. O’Gower, A. K. &Mathewson, R. F. Spectral sensitivity and flicker-fusion frequency of the lemon shark,Negaprion brevirostris In P. W. Gilben, R W. Mathewson, & O. P. Rall (Eds).Sharks skates and rays Baltimore Johns Hopkins Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  14. Pavloy I. P.Conditioned reflexes (translated by G. V. Anrep). London, Oxford University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
  15. Powell, D. A. Schneiderman, N., Elster, A. J., &Jacobson, A. Differential classical conditioning in rabbits (Orvctolagus cumculus) to tones and changes in illumination.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,76, 267–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rescorla, R. A. Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 71–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Schneiderman, N.Classical [Pavlovian] conditioning, New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  18. Schneiderman, N., &Gormezano, I. Conditioning of the nictitating membrane of the albino rabbit as a function of the CS-US interval.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,57, 188–195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel H. Gruber
    • 1
  • Neil Schneiderman
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Biology and Living Resources, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of MiamiMiami

Personalised recommendations