Individual solution processes while solving addition and multiplication math facts in adults

Abstract

Contrary to predictions of current solution process models, adults used a variety of procedures other than retrieval to solve addition and multiplication math facts. Predictors assumed to capture retrieval processes posited by such models did account for a substantial proportion of variance in averaged retrieval solution times. But most of the variance in individual participants’ retrieval times remained unaccounted for. Cross-operation associations in patterns of strategy use and retrieval latencies were obtained. Adults with stronger higher level math achievement were more likely to use retrieval, solved math facts faster and less variably, and executed retrieval processes posited by current solution process models faster than participants with less math attainment. The results are explained within the context of the adaptive strategy choice model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ashcraft, M. H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory.Cognition,44, 75–106.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashcraft, M. H., Donley, R. D., Halas, M. A., & Vakali, M. (1992). Working memory, automaticity, and problem difficulty. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.),The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 301–329). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baroody, A. J. (1993). Early mental multiplication performance and the role of relational knowledge in mastering combinations involving “two.”Learning & Instruction,3, 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell, J. I. D., & Graham, D. J. (1985). Mental multiplication skill: Structure, process, and acquisition.Canadian Journal of Psychology,39, 338–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell, J. I. D., & Oliphant, M. (1992). Representation and retrieval of arithmetic facts: A network interference model and simulation. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.),The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 331–364). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooney, J. B., Swanson, H. L., & Ladd, S. F. (1988). Acquisition of mental multiplication skill: Evidence for the transition between counting and retrieval strategies.Cognition & Instruction,5, 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geary, D. C. (1993). Mathematical disabilities: Cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components.Psychological Bulletin,114, 345–362.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geary, D. C., & Widaman, K. F. (1987). Individual differences in cognitive arithmetic.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 154–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geary, D. C., & Widaman, K. F. (1992). Numerical cognition: On the convergence of componential and psychometric models.Intelligence,16, 47–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Geary, D. C., Widaman, K. F., & Little, T. D. (1986). Cognitive addition and multiplication: Evidence for a single memory network.Memory & Cognition,14, 478–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Geary, D. C., & Wiley, J. G. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed of processing differences in young and elderly adults.Psychology & Aging,6, 474–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hecht, S. A. (1998). Toward an information processing account of individual differences in fraction skills.Journal of Educational Psychology,90, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kail, R., & Salthouse, T. A. (1994). Processing speed as a mental capacity.Acta Psychologica,86, 199–225.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. LeFevre, J. A., Bisanz, J., Daley, K. E., Buffone, L., & Sadesky, G. S. (1996). Multiple solution routes to solution of single-digit multiplication problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 284–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. LeFevre, J. A., Sadesky, G. S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 216–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lorch, R. F., & Meyers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCloskey, M., Harley, W., & Sokol, S. M. (1991). Models of arithmetic fact retrieval: An evaluation in light of findings from normal and brain-damaged participants.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, K. F., & Paredes, D. R. (1990). Starting to add worse: Effects of learning to multiply on children’s addition.Cognition,37, 213–242.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, K. [F.], Perlmutter, M., & Keating, D. (1984). Cognitive arithmetic: Comparison of operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Siegler, R. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children’s addition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 250–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Siegler, R. S. (1988a). Individual differences in strategy choices: Good students, not-so-good students, and perfectionists.Child Development,59, 833–851.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Siegler, R. S. (1988b). Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 258–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Siegler, R. S., & Shipley, E. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In G. Halford & T. Simon (Eds.),Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 31–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study.Developmental Psychology,30, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Widaman, K. F., & Little, T. D. (1992). The development of skill in mental arithmetic: An individual differences approach. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.),The nature and origins of mathematical skills. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Widaman, K. F., Little, T. D., Geary, D. C., & Cormier, P. (1992). Individual differences in the development of skill in mental addition: Internal and external validation of chronometric models.Learning & Individual Differences,4, 167–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Alan Hecht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hecht, S.A. Individual solution processes while solving addition and multiplication math facts in adults. Mem Cogn 27, 1097–1107 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201239

Download citation

Keywords

  • Solution Time
  • Retrieval Process
  • Associative Strength
  • Item Analysis
  • Retrieval Time