Skip to main content
Log in

Visual distraction, working memory, and aging

  • Published:
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In two experiments, the effects of taxing selective attention processes on the efficiency of working memory processes were considered in relation to normal aging. In both experiments, the presence of task-irrelevant information disrupted the efficiency of working memory processes, and the effect was generally greater for older than for younger adults. The presence of distracting information increased the frequency of intrusion errors in both younger and older adults and of memory-based errors in older adults. These findings suggest that distraction disrupts both the ability to maintain a coherent stream of goal-directed thought and action in younger and older adults and the encoding and retention of relevant information in older adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baddeley, A. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, M. J., &Alvarez, A. A. (1994). Psychometric intelligence and visual focused attention: Relationships in nonsearch tasks.Intelligence,18, 77–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. D., &Servan-Schreiber, D. (1992). Context, cortex, and dopamine: A connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia.Psychological Review,99, 45–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., Shisler, R., & Engle, R. W. (1998).The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system.Psychological Bulletin,104, 163–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (1995).Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., &Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. In F. I. M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.),Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191–211). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., Emslie, H., Williams, P., Johnson, R., &Freer, C. (1996). Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goaldirected behavior.Cognitive Psychology,30, 257–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., &Shisler, R. J. (1995). A resource account of inhibition.Psychological Science,6, 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, D., Andres, D., Arbuckle, T., &Schwartzman, A. (1988). Measurement and correlates of verbosity in elderly people.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences,43, P27-P33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, V. P., &Hasher, L. (1992). Age and the availability of inferences.Psychology & Aging,7, 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, M., &Hasher, L. (1991). Aging and suppression: Memory for previously relevant information.Psychology & Aging,6, 587–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E. R., Zacks, R. T., &Rypma, B. A. (1991). Age and inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view.Psychology of Learning & Motivation,22, 122–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, A. (1995).RTSYS Version 1 [Computer software]. Callaghan, NSW, Australia: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., &Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention.Psychology & Aging,9, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowd, J. M., &Filion, D. L. (1992). Aging, selective attention, and inhibitory processes: A psychophysiological approach.Psychology & Aging,7, 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. J., Hager, L. D., &Heron, C. (1994). Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 374–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouleau, N., &Belleville, S. (1996). Irrelevant speech effect in aging: An assessment of inhibitory processes in working memory.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences,51B, P356-P363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Influence of processing speed on adult age differences in working memory.Acta Psychologica,79, 155–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review,103, 403–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A., Babcock, R. L., &Shaw, R. J. (1991). Effects of adult age on structural and operational capacities in working memory.Psychology & Aging,6, 118–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,298, 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., &Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimers type.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, S. P. (1991). Less attentional selectivity as a result of declining inhibition in older adults.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,29, 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, R. (1999). Age differences in lapses of intention in the Stroop task.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences,54B, P34-P43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R., &Baylis, G. C. (1998). Effects of increased response dominance and contextual disintegration on the Stroop interference effect in older adults.Psychology & Aging,13, 206–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert West.

Additional information

The research reported in this article was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship to the author, funded by Grant RO1 AG13845-01 from the National Institute of Aging, awarded to L. L. Jacoby and F. I. M. Craik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

West, R. Visual distraction, working memory, and aging. Mem Cogn 27, 1064–1072 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201235

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201235

Keywords

Navigation