Abstract
Human spatial encoding of three-dimensional navigable space was studied, using a virtual environment simulation. This allowed subjects to become familiar with a realistic scene by making simulated rotational and translational movements during training. Subsequent tests determined whether subjects could generalize their recognition ability by identifying novel-perspective views and topographic floor plans of the scene. Results from picture recognition tests showed that familiar direction views were most easily recognized, although significant generalization to novel views was observed. Topographic floor plans were also easily identified. In further experiments, novel-view performance diminished when active training was replaced by passive viewing of static images of the scene. However, the ability to make self-initiated movements, as opposed to watching dynamic movie sequences, had no effect on performance. These results suggest that representation of navigable space is view dependent and highlight the importance of spatial-temporal continuity during learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aloimonos, Y. (1993).Active perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Appleyard, D. (1970). Styles and methods of structuring a city.Environment & Behavior,2, 100–118.
Arthur, E. J. (1996).Orientation specificity in the mental representation of three-dimensional environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis St. Paul.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review,94, 115–147.
Biederman, I., &Gerhardstein, P. C. (1992). Recognizing depthrotated objects: Evidence for 3D viewpoint invariance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1162–1182.
Blake, A., &Yuille, A. (1992).Active vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bruce, P. R., &Herman, J. F. (1983). Spatial knowledge of young and elderly adults: Scene recognition from familiar and novel perspectives.Experimental Aging Research,9, 169–173.
Bülthoff, H. H., Edelman, S., &Tarr, M. J. (1995). How are threedimensional objects represented in the brain?Cerebral Cortex,3, 247–260.
Chance, S. S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A. C., &Loomis, J. M. (1998). Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs in path integration.Presence: Special Issue on Navigation,7, 168–178.
Diwadkar, V. A., &McNamara, T. P. (1997). View dependence in scene recognition.Psychological Science,8, 302–307.
Gibson, J. J. (1979).The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hock, H. S., &Schmelzkopf, K. F. (1980). The abstraction of schematic representations from photographs of real-world scenes.Memory & Cognition,8, 543–554.
Lee, D. N. (1974). Visual information during locomotion. In R. B. MacLeod & H. Pick (Eds.),Perception: Essays in honour of J. J. Gibson. New York: Cornell University Press.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maguire, E. A., Frith, C. D., Burgess, N., Donnet, J. G., &O’Keefe, J. (1998). Knowing where things are: Parahippocampal involvement in encoding object locations in virtual large-scale space.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,10, 61–76.
May, M., Péruch, P., &Savoyant, A. (1995). Navigating in a virtual environment with map-acquired knowledge: Encoding and alignment effects.Ecological Psychology,7, 21–36.
O’Keefe, J. O., &Nadel, L. (1978).The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Péruch, P., &Gaunet, F. (1998). Virtual environments as a promising tool for investigating human spatial cognition.Current Psychology of Cognition,17, 881–899.
Péruch, P., Vercher, J. L., &Gauthier, G. M. (1995). Acquisition of spatial knowledge through visual exploration of simulated environments.Ecological Psychology,7, 1–20.
Piaget, J., &Inhelder, B. (1967).The child’s conception of space. New York: Norton.
Poggio, T., &Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects.Nature,343, 263–266.
Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1157–1165.
Rock, I., &DiVita, J. (1987). A case of viewer-centred object perception.Cognitive Psychology,19, 280–293.
Roskos-Ewoldson, B., McNamara, T. P., Shelton, A. L., &Carr, W. (1998). Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 215–226.
Rowland, G. L., Franken, R. E., Bouchard, L. M., &Sookochoff, M. B. (1978). Recognition of familiar scenes from new perspectives.Perceptual & Motor Skills,46, 2, 1287–1292.
Shelton, A. L., &McNamara, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 102–106.
Siegel, A. W., &White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H. W. Reese (Ed.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol 10, pp. 9–55). New York: Academic Press.
Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of threedimensional objects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 55–82.
Thorndyke, P. W., &Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation.Cognitive Psychology,14, 560–589.
Ullman, S., &Basri, R. (1991). Recognition by linear combinations of models.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence,13, 992–1005.
Wang, R. F., &Simons, D. J. (1997). Layout change detection is differentially affected by display rotations and observer movements [Abstract].Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,38, 4695.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
C.G.C. was supported by a scholarship from the Max-Planck Gesellchaft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christou, C.G., Bülthoff, H.H. View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Mem Cogn 27, 996–1007 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201230
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201230