Skip to main content
Log in

Deconstructing Marilyn: Robust effects of face contexts on stimulus—response compatibility

  • Published:
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hommel and Lippa (1995) found a left—right spatial compatibility effect with respect to a background context of Marilyn Monroe’s face, rotated 90° clockwise or counterclockwise from upright, when subjects responded to up or down stimuli by pressing a left or a right key. They interpreted their results as providing evidence for object-based coding of stimulus location. We conducted four experiments in order to evaluate the reliability of this face context effect, to control for possible artifacts and evaluate alternative explanations, and to establish generalizability to other face contexts. This was accomplished by using not only the original photograph, but also a mirror-reversed image, chimeric faces composed from the left or the right sides of the original photograph, an outline drawing face, and a circle with markings for facial features. Our results were much stronger than those of Hommel and Lippa, and the face context effect was found for all of the face variations. Our experiments also provided evidence to suggest that asymmetric coding of the up and down locations contributes to performance in the face context as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, J. J., Boon, B., Paas, F. G. W. C., &Umiltà, C. (1998). The up-right/down-left advantage for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: A dual-strategy hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1582–1595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, D. W., &Miller, J. (1982). Stimulus—response compatibility and the motor system.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,34A, 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D. R., &Russell, R. L. (1998). Some cautions regarding statistical power in split-plot designs.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,30, 462–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, A., &Proctor, R. W. (1992). Persistence of stimulus-response compatibility effects with extended practice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 801–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., &Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is “special” about face perception?Psychological Review,105, 482–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1994). Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity.Psychological Research,56, 179–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., &Lippa, Y. (1995). S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 370–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., &Prinz, W. (Eds.) (1997).Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladavas, E., &Moscovitch, M. (1984). Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberts, K., Tavernier, G., &d’Ydewalle, G. (1992). Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.Acta Psychologica,79, 115–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, Y. (1996). A referential-coding explanation for compatibility effects of physically orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 950–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, C.-H., &Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 174–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, C. F. (1989). S-R compatibilities depend on eccentricity of responding hand.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, C. F., &Schilder, S. (1991). Stimulus—response compatibilities between vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: The effects of hand position and posture.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 342–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti, R., &Umiltà, C. (1994). Right—left prevalence in spatial compatibility.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., &Dutta, A. (1993). Do the same stimulus—response relations influence choice reactions initially and after practice?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 922–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., &Reeve, T. G. (Eds.) (1990).Stimulus—response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, T. G., &Proctor, R. W. (1990). The salient-features coding principle for spatial- and symbolic-compatibility effects. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.),Stimulus—response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 163–180). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roswarski, T. E., &Proctor, R. W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks.Psychological Research,59, 196–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umiltà, C. (1991). Problems of the salient-features coding hypothesis: Comment on Weeks and Proctor.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,120, 83–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, D. J., &Proctor, R. W. (1990). Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, D. J., Proctor, R. W., &Beyak, B. (1995). Stimulus—response compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: Evidence for spatial coding.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 367–383.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. Proctor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Proctor, R.W., Pick, D.F. Deconstructing Marilyn: Robust effects of face contexts on stimulus—response compatibility. Mem Cogn 27, 986–995 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201229

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201229

Keywords

Navigation