Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article
Assessing the accuracy of conflicting autobiographical memories
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Memories people no longer believe in can still affect them in helpful and harmful ways

14 June 2022

Ryan Burnell, Robert A. Nash, … Maryanne Garry

When trying to recall our past, all roads lead to Rome: More evidence for the multi-process retrieval theory of autobiographical memory

25 September 2020

John H. Mace, Bobbie Jo A. Staley & McKenzie K. Sopoci

What characterizes the reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory? New answers to an old question

24 January 2020

Tabea Wolf & Daniel Zimprich

Leveling up the analysis of the reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory: A new approach based on multilevel multinomial models

20 June 2018

Daniel Zimprich & Tabea Wolf

Subjective judgments on direct and generative retrieval of autobiographical memory: The role of interoceptive sensibility and emotion

16 March 2022

Noboru Matsumoto, Lynn Ann Watson, … Masanori Kobayashi

Autobiographical memory functions in the recall of authentic moments

18 November 2022

Anna Sutton

Factorial structure of autobiographical recollection assessed by a Turkish version of Autobiographical Recollection Test (ART)

14 October 2021

Berivan Ece, Ezgi Aytürk, … Sami Gülgöz

Framing the past (and future): Effects of generic photos on autobiographical judgments

04 January 2021

Joseph C. Wilson & Deanne L. Westerman

Experience-based knowledge increases confidence in discriminating our memories

26 September 2018

Ewelina Cichoń, Łukasz Gawęda, … Remigiusz Szczepanowski

Download PDF
  • Published: November 1998

Assessing the accuracy of conflicting autobiographical memories

  • Michael Ross1,
  • Roger Buehler2 &
  • James W. Karr1 

Memory & Cognition volume 26, pages 1233–1244 (1998)Cite this article

  • 542 Accesses

  • 20 Citations

  • 11 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

We examined criteria that rememberers and neutral audiences use to validate conflicting memories. In Experiment 1, rememberers described an incident that they recalled differently from someone else from their own and the other person’s perspective. Rememberers and audiences then evaluated the accuracy of statements in both accounts, explained their accuracy ratings, and appraised the qualities of the memories. In Experiment 2, dyads who possessed conflicting memories of a shared past episode evaluated each other’s recollections. In both studies, rememberers rated their own recollections as more accurate than other people’s and based their judgments primarily on the internal coherence of the memories. Rememberers used consensus more frequently and sensory detail less often to evaluate other people’s memories than their own. Audiences (Experiment 1) reported examining the consistency between the accounts and their own experiences; they also used consensus and normative behavior to a greater extent than rememberers. In both studies, rememberers judged their own accounts to be more detailed and coherent. Their ratings of detail and coherence predicted their ratings of accuracy.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

References

  • Bahrick, H. P., Hall, L. K., &Berger, S. A. (1996). Accuracy and distortion in memory for high school grades.Psychological Science,7, 265–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. E., &Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,56, 669–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1986).Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. I., &Lassiter, G. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.),The self and social life (pp. 323–370). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effects of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. H., Darley, J. M., Hilton, J. L., &Kojetin, B. A. (1990). Multiple audience problem: A strategic communication perspective on social perception.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,58, 593–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.American Psychologist,35, 603–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., &Lurie, L. (1983). Context, categorization, and memory: The “change-of-standard” effect.Cognitive Psychology,15, 525–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K. (1988). Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 390–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., &Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 371–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., &Sherman, S. J. (1990). Constructing and reconstructing the past and future in the present. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.),Handbook of motivation and social cognition: Foundations of social behaviour (Vol. 2, pp. 482–526). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M. (1981). Impression formation, impression management, and nonverbal behaviours. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Hermann, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.),Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 323–341). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F. (1981). Mentalmorphosis: Alterations in memory produced by the bonding of new information to old. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 417–434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories.American Psychologist,48, 518–537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F., &Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An examination of the interaction between language and memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 585–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., &Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.Memory & Cognition,25, 826–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934).Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1964).Selected writings (A. J. Reck, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, K. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.Memory & Cognition,25, 838–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, R. M., Thompson, W. C., &Bower, G. H. (1980). Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,39, 2–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories.Psychological Review,96, 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (1997). Validating memories. In N. L. Stein, P. A. Ornstein, B. Tversky, & C. Brainerd (Eds.),Memory for everyday and emotional events (pp. 49–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., &Buehler, R. (1994). Creative remembering. In U. Neisser & R. Fivush (Eds.),The remembering self (pp. 205–235). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., &Fletcher, J. G. O. (1985). Attribution and social perception. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 73–122). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L. (1996).Searching for memory. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W., Clark, C. A., &Loftus, E. F. (1988). Knowing when memory is real. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R.N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 83–88). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W., Gerhard, D., &Loftus, E. F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., &Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health.Psychological Bulletin,103, 193–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Undeutsch, U. (1988). The development of statement reality analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.),Credibility assessment (pp. 101–120). Amsterdam: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincente, K. J., &Brewer, W. F. (1993). Reconstructive remembering of the scientific literature.Cognition,46, 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuille, J. C. (1988).Credibility assessment. Amsterdam: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangwill, O. L. (1972). Remembering revisited.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,24, 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DeFrank, R. S., Hall, J. A., Larrance, D. T., &Rosenthal, R. (1979). Facial and vocal cues of deception and honesty.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,15, 378–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, N2L 3G1, Waterloo, ON, Canada

    Michael Ross & James W. Karr

  2. Wifrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    Roger Buehler

Authors
  1. Michael Ross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roger Buehler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James W. Karr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Ross.

Additional information

This research was supported by a doctoral fellowship to J.W.K. and research grants to M.R. and R.B. from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ross, M., Buehler, R. & Karr, J.W. Assessing the accuracy of conflicting autobiographical memories. Mem Cogn 26, 1233–1244 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201197

Download citation

  • Received: 29 April 1997

  • Accepted: 27 January 1998

  • Issue Date: November 1998

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201197

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Accuracy Rating
  • Audience Participant
  • Internal Coherence
  • Truth Criterion
  • Consistency Criterion
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 3.238.134.157

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.