Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Go to cart
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article
Exposure effects on music preference and recognition
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

What do less accurate singers remember? Pitch-matching ability and long-term memory for music

18 November 2021

Andrea R. Halpern & Peter Q. Pfordresher

Aggregate context effects in music processing

12 March 2020

Mark A. Schmuckler, Dominique T. Vuvan & Olivia Podolak Lewandowska

Individuals with congenital amusia remember music they like

22 March 2023

Yohana Lévêque, E. Glenn Schellenberg, … Barbara Tillmann

Enhanced salience of musical sounds in singers and instrumentalists

03 May 2022

Inês Martins, César F. Lima & Ana P. Pinheiro

Musical emotions affect memory for emotional pictures

23 June 2022

Francesca Talamini, Greta Eller, … Marcel Zentner

A Functional Analysis of “Aesthetic”: A Commentary on Mechner

13 August 2018

Henry D. Schlinger Jr

Emotion and expertise: how listeners with formal music training use cues to perceive emotion

29 January 2021

Aimee Battcock & Michael Schutz

The influence of memory on the speech-to-song illusion

26 January 2022

Lauren E. Soehlke, Ashwini Kamat, … Michael S. Vitevitch

Can musical ability be tested online?

11 August 2021

Ana Isabel Correia, Margherita Vincenzi, … E. Glenn Schellenberg

Download PDF
  • Published: September 1998

Exposure effects on music preference and recognition

  • Isabelle Peretz1,
  • Danielle Gaudreau1 &
  • Anne-Marie Bonnel2 

Memory & Cognition volume 26, pages 884–902 (1998)Cite this article

  • 9296 Accesses

  • 162 Citations

  • 17 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

In three experiments, the effects of exposure to melodies on their subsequent liking and recognition were explored. In each experiment, the subjects first listened to a set of familiar and unfamiliar melodies in a study phase. In the subsequent test phase, the melodies were repeated, along with a set of distractors matched in familiarity. Half the subjects were required to rate their liking of each melody, and half had to identify the melodies they had heard earlier in the study phase. Repetition of the studied melodies was found to increase liking of the unfamiliar melodies in the affect task and to be best for detection of familiar melodies in the recognition task (Experiments 1, 2, and 3). These memory effects were found to fade at different time delays between study and test in the affect and recognition tasks, with the latter leading to the most persistent effects (Experiment 2). Both study-to-test changes in melody timbre and manipulation of study tasks had a marked impact on recognition and little influence on liking judgments (Experiment 3). Thus, all manipulated variables were found to dissociate the memory effects in the two tasks. The results are consistent with the view that memory effects in the affect and recognition tasks pertain to the implicit and explicit forms of memory, respectively. Part of the results are, however, at variance with the literature on implicit and explicit memory in the auditory domain. Attribution of these differences to the use of musical material is discussed.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Attneave, F., &Olson, R. (1971). Pitch as a medium: A new approach to psychophysical scaling.American Journal of Psychology,84, 147–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, J., &Dowling, J. (1980). The recognition of transposed melodies: A key-distance effect in development perspective.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, J., Halpern, A., &Dowling, J. (1995). Recognition of familiar and unfamiliar melodies in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease.Memory & Cognition,23, 531–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassili, J. N., Smith, M. C., &MacLeod, C. M. (1989). Auditory and visual word-stem completion: Separating data-driven and conceptually driven processes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 439–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthier, J. E. (1979).1000 chants. Paris: Les Presses de l’Ile-de-France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, R., &Cooper, L. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research 1968–1987.Psychological Bulletin,106, 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R., &d’Agostino, P. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/ attributional model of the mere exposure effect.Social Cognition,12, 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Redfield, J., Harrison, A., &Crandall, R. (1972). Drive and predisposition as factors in the attidudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,8, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlesimo, G. A., Marfia, G. A., Loasses, A., &Caltagirone, C. (1994). Perceptual and conceptual components in implicit and explicit stem completion.Neuropsychologia,34, 785–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cave, C. B., Bost, P. R., &Cobb, R. E. (1996). Effects of color and pattern on implicit and explicit picture memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 639–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cave, C. B., &Squire, L. R. (1992). Intact and long-lasting repetition priming in amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 509–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C.-Y., &Schacter, D. L. (1995). Auditory priming for nonverbal information: Implicit and explicit memory for environmental sounds.Consciousness & Cognition,4, 440–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, B. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1994). Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: Implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. A., Schacter, D. L., Ballesteros, S., &Moore, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F., Moscovitch, M., &McDowd, J. (1994). Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 864–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, I., Howell, P., &West, R. (1983). Preferences for scale structure in melodic sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 444–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, D. D., &Alf, E., Jr. (1969). Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence interval-rating-method data.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,6, 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J., &Fujitani, D. (1971). Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,49, 524–531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H., Shepherd, J., &Davies, G. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition.Perception,8, 431–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, A., &Moore, H. (1924). The immediate and long-time effects of classical and popular phonograph selections.Journal of Applied Psychology,8, 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldinger, S. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1166–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, P., &Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, P., Mandler, G., &Haden, P. E. (1982). Simulating amnesic symptoms in normals.Sciences,218, 1243–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley. (Reprinted 1974 by Krieger, Huntington, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, K. W., &Bauer, R. M. (1990). Implicit learning of new faces in prosopagnosia: An application of the mere exposure paradigm.Neuropsychologia,28, 1035–1041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heingartner, A., &Hall, J. (1974). Affective consequences in adults and children of repeated exposure to auditory stimuli.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,29, 719–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyduk, R. G. (1975). Rated preference for musical compositions as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 84–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L., &Kelley, C. M. (1987). Unconscious influences of memory for a prior event.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,13, 314–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Java, R., &Gardiner, J. (1991). Priming and aging: Further evidence of preserved memory function.American Journal of Psychology,104, 89–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Java, R., Kaminska, Z., &Gardiner, J. (1995). Recognition memory and awareness for famous and obscure musical themes.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,7, 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., Kim, J., &Risse, G. (1985). Do alcoholic Korsakoff ’s syndrome patients acquire affective reactions?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky, R. L., &Forrest, F. H. (1984). Recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces.Memory & Cognition,12, 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, H. (1943). Affective responses to music as a function of familiarity.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,38, 388–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, L., &Walters, W. (1968). Effects of repeated listening on connotative meaning of serious music.Perceptual & Motor Skills,26, 891–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, L., &Singh, A. (1987). Implicit and explicit memory in young and older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 531–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupker, S., Harbuk, J., &Patrick, A. (1991). Memory for things forgotten.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 897–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., &Van Zandt, B. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure to stimuli that cannot be recognized.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 646–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsolek, C. J., Kosslyn, S. M., &Squire, L. R. (1992). Form-specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphere.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 492–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (1903). Experimental studies in the psychology of music.American Journal of Psychology,14, 456–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micco, A., &Masson, M. (1991). Implicit memory for new associations: An interactive process approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 1105–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T. (1914). The genetic aspect of consonance and dissonance.Psychological Monographs (Whole No. 73).

  • Moscovitch, M., Vriezen, E., &Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (1993). Implicit tests of memory in patients with focal lesions or degenerative brain disorders. In H. Spinnler & F. Boller (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp.133–173). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mull, H. (1957). The effect of repetition upon enjoyment of modern music.Journal of Psychology,43, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. L., Shreiber, T. A., &Holley, P. E. (1992). The retrieval of controlled and automatic aspects of meaning on direct and indirect tests.Memory & Cognition,20, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, D., &Shaw, R. (1992). Effect of environmental support on implicit and explicit memory in younger and older adults.Psychology & Aging,7, 632–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretz, I. (1996). Can we lose memory for music? A case of music agnosia in a nonmusician.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,8, 481–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretz, I., Babaï, M., Lussier, I., Hébert, S., &Gagnon, L. (1995). Corpus d’extraits musicaux: Indices relatifs à la familiarité, à l’âge d’acquisition et aux évocations verbales.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 211–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radvansky, G., Fleming, K., &Simmons, J. (1995). Timbre reliance in nonmusicians’ and musicians’ memory for melodies.Music Perception,13, 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram, S., &Roediger, H. L., III (1993). Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 765–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of Neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III,Weldon, M. L., Stadler, M. L., &Riegler, G. L. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: Word fragment and word stem completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1251–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russel, P. (1987). Memory for music: A study of musical and listener factors.British Journal of Psychology,78, 335–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Bowers, J., &Booker, J. (1989). Intentional awareness and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.),Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., &Church, B. A. (1992). Auditory priming: Implicit and explicit memory for words and voices.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 915–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., &Church, B. [A.] (1995). Implicit memory in amnesic patients: When is auditory priming spared?Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,1, 434–442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Church, B. [A.], &Bolton, E. (1995). Implicit memory in amnesic patients: Impairment of voice-specific priming.Psychological Science,6, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Church, B. A., &Osowiecki, D. (1994). Auditory priming in elderly adults: Impairment of voice-specific implicit memory.Memory,2, 295–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Church, B. [A.], &Treadwell, J. (1994). Implicit memory in amnesic patients: Evidence for spared auditory priming.Psychological Science,5, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., &Delaney, S. M. (1990). Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., Delaney, S. M., Peterson, M. A., &Tharan, M. (1991). Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., &Teadwell, J. (1993). Preserved priming of novel objects across size transformation in amnesic patients.Psychological Science,4, 331–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., &Tulving, E. (Eds.) (1994).Memory systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., &Kauff, D. M. (1983). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 187–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seamon, J. G., Ganor-Stern, D., Crowley, M. J., Wilson, S. M., Weber, W. J., O’Rourke, C. M., &Mahoney, J. K. (1997). A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition.Memory & Cognition,25, 367–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seamon, J. G., Williams, P. C., Crowley, M. J., Kim, I. J., Langer, S., Orne, P., &Wishengrad, D. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 711–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., &Melara, R. J. (1990). Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: `Tis the gift to be simple.Cognition,34, 279–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. G., Hishman, E., &Fan, J. (1996). The sensory match effect in recognition memory: Perceptual fluency or episodic trace?Memory & Cognition,24, 367–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.Psychological Review,99, 195–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L., Shimamura, A., &Graf, P. (1987). Strength and duration of priming effects in normal subjects and amnesic patients.Neuropsychologia,25, 195–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, B., Kihlstrom, J., &Schacter, D. L. (1992). Emotion and implicit memory. In S. Christanson (Ed.),The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp. 67–92). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychologist,26, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., &Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems.Science,247, 301–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linden, M., Lories, G., &Cornille, M. (1993). The abstraction of a central tendency in amnesic patients.Cortex,29, 543–548.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verveer, E., Barry, H., &Bousfield, W. (1933). Change in affectivity with repetition.American Journal of Psychology,45, 130–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, E. K., &Weiskrantz, L. (1970). Amnesic syndrome: Consolidation or retrieval?Nature,228, 628–630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, M., Child, M., &Abel, T. (1927). The effects of immediate repetition on the pleasantness of music. In M. Schoen (Ed.),The effects of music (pp. 199–210). New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1979). Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,37, 811–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, R. (1990). Recognition of melody, harmonic accompaniment, and instrumentation: Musicians vs. nonmusicians.Music Perception,8, 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas, A. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology Monographs,9 (Pt. 2), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    Isabelle Peretz & Danielle Gaudreau

  2. Center of Cognitive Neuroscience, CNRS, Marseille, France

    Anne-Marie Bonnel

Authors
  1. Isabelle Peretz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danielle Gaudreau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anne-Marie Bonnel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Peretz.

Additional information

This research was supported by a research grant to the first author and a fellowship to the second author from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and by a summer studentship from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ) to Véronique Reich.

—Accepted by previous associate editor Michael E. J. Masson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peretz, I., Gaudreau, D. & Bonnel, AM. Exposure effects on music preference and recognition. Mem Cogn 26, 884–902 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201171

Download citation

  • Received: 23 December 1996

  • Accepted: 23 May 1997

  • Issue Date: September 1998

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201171

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Recognition Task
  • Journal ofExperimental Psychology
  • Implicit Memory
  • Explicit Memory
  • Memory Effect
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 95.216.99.153

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.