Abstract
We investigated whether feeling-of-knowing judgments are influenced by the number of different neighboring concepts linked to the test cue in long-term memory as measured using association norms. The purpose was to evaluate contrasting predictions made by the partial-retrieval hypothesis and the competition hypothesis. The partial-retrieval hypothesis assumes the more neighboring concepts activated by the test cue, the higher the feeling of knowing. In contrast, the competition hypothesis assumes that feelings of knowing are sensitive to competition between neighboring concepts, and it predicts that the fewer neighboring concepts activated by the cue, the higher the feeling of knowing. The findings were compatible with the competition hypothesis showing that both feeling-of-knowing and prediction-of-knowing ratings always were higher, the fewer different concepts were linked to the test cue. We obtained an identical pattern of results using different kinds of cues including taxonomic category names, ending sounds, and meaningfully related associates. We consider different ways that these findings could be reconciled with the partial-retrieval hypothesis, and we also discuss implications for other explanations of feeling-of-knowing effects.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blake, M. (1973). Prediction of recognition when recall fails: Exploring the feeling of knowing phenomenon.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 89–94.
Brown, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience.Psychological Bulletin,109, 204–223.
Canas, J. J., &Nelson, D. L. (1986). Recognition and environmental context: The effect of testing by phone.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 407–409.
Eysenck, M. W. (1979). The feeling of knowing a word’s meaning.British Journal of Psychology,70, 243–251.
Freedman, J. L., &Loftus, E. F. (1971). Retrieval of words from longterm memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 107–115.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Hart, D. (1967). Memory and the memory-monitoring process.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 685–691.
Joelson, J. M., &Herrmann, D. J. (1978). Properties of categories in semantic memory.American Journal of Psychology,91, 101–114.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.Psychological Review,100, 609–639.
Koriat, A., &Lieblich, I. (1977). A study of memory pointers.Acta Psychologica,58, 151–164.
Krinsky, R., &Nelson, T. O. (1985). The feeling of knowing for different kinds of retrieval failure.Acta Psychologica,58, 141–158.
Leonesio, R. J., &Nelson, T. O. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 464–470.
Libukman, T. M. (1994). Norms for words that rhyme.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,26, 278–322.
McEvoy, C. L., &Nelson, D. L. (1982). Category name and instance norms for 106 categories of various sizes.American Journal of Psychology,95, 581–634.
Metcalfe, J. (1993). Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model: Implications for Korsakoff amnesia.Psychological Review,99, 1–20.
Nelson, D. L. (1989). Implicitly activated knowledge and memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive psychology: The Tulane Floweree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 129–162). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nelson, D. L., Bajo, M. T., &Canas, J. J. (1987). Prior knowledge and memory: The episodic encoding of implicitly activated associates and rhymes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 54–63.
Nelson, D. L., Canas, J. [J.], &Bajo, M. T. (1987). The effects of natural category size on memory for episodic encodings.Memory & Cognition,15, 133–140.
Nelson, D. L., Canas, J. [J.], Casanueva, D., &Castano, D. (1985). Prior knowledge and recognition.American Journal of Psychology,98, 379–397.
Nelson, D. L., Friedrich, M. A. (1980). Encoding and cueing sounds and senses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,6, 717–731.
Nelson, D. L., &McEvoy, C. L. (1979). Encoding context and set size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 292–314.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., &Bajo, M. T. (1988). Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.American Journal of Psychology,101, 465–480.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1995).The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Unpublished manuscript.
Nelson, D. L., &Schreiber, T. A. (1992). Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 237–260.
Nelson, D. L., Schreiber, T. A., &Holley, P. E. (1992). The retrieval of controlled and automatic aspects of meaning on direct and indirect tests.Memory & Cognition,20, 671–684.
Nelson, D. L., Schreiber, T. A., &McEvoy, C. L. (1992). Processing implicit and explicit representations.Psychological Review,99, 322–348.
Nelson, T. O., Gerler, D., &Narens, L. (1984). Accuracy of feelingof-knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 282–300.
Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–141). San Diego: Academic Press.
Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research.Memory & Cognition,12, 531–552.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., &Shiffrin, A. M. (1983). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.
Reder, L. M. (1988). Strategic control of retrieval strategies. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 227–259). New York: Academic Press.
Reder, L. M., &Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 435–451.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Neely, J. H. (1982). Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 213–242.
Schacter, D. L. (1983). Feeling of knowing in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 39–54.
Schreiber, T. A. (1993).Feelings of knowing are based upon implicitly activated knowledge about the test cue and the target. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida.
Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: Implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses.Memory & Cognition,26, 553–571.
Schreiber, T. A., & Carter, K. (1998).The activation of preexisting associations in an episodic memory task. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Schreiber, T. A., Sergent, S. D. (1998).Dissociate effects of cue set size on predictions of knowing and actual knowing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Schwartz, B. L., &Metcalfe, J. (1992). Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1074–1083.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant MH 16360 to the second author.
—Accepted by previous associate editor Thomas O. Nelson
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schreiber, T.A., Nelson, D.L. The relation between feelings of knowing and the number of neighboring concepts linked to the test cue. Mem Cogn 26, 869–883 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201170
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201170