Abstract
Theprocess-dissociation procedure is designed to provide quantitative estimates of the influence of explicit and implicit memory in a variety of tasks. The procedure relies on the assumption that these two forms of memory produce independent influences on performance. Prior investigators have attempted to test this assumption by determining whether the parameter representing the influence of implicit memory (denotedA) is constant across experimental conditions. I argue that the constancy of A cannot provide an appropriate test of the independence assumption, because (1) the prediction of constancy can be generated without the assumption of independence, obviating the need to posit independence; and (2) the constancy ofA does not necessarily imply independence, even if one assumes that a dependency hypothesis, supplemented by ancillary assumptions (Curran & Hintzman, 1995), predicts differences inA. I close by emphasizing that we can test the independence assumption by using standard procedures that compare the fit of a model that assumes independence with the fit of a model that assumes dependence.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., &Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 137–160.
Challis, B. H., &Brodbeck, D. R. (1992). Levels of processing affects priming in word fragment completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 595–607.
Curran, T., &Hintzman, D. L. (1995). Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 531–547.
Graf, P., &Komatsu, S.-I. (1994). Process dissociation procedure: Handle with caution!European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,6, 113–129.
Graf, P., &Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541.
Jacoby, L. L., Begg, I. M., &Toth, J. P. (1997). In defense of functional independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the process-dissociation procedure?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 485–495.
Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., &Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 139–154.
Jennings, J. M., &Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control.Psychology & Aging,8, 283–293.
Mulligan, N. W., &Hirshman, E. (1997). Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 280–304.
Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F., &Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves.Psychological Review,99, 518–535.
Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J. M., &Java, R. I. (1994). Involuntary conscious memory and the method of opposition.Memory,2, 1–29.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in wordfragment completion.Memory & Cognition,15, 379–388.
Russo, R., Cullis, A. M., & Parkin, A. J. (in press). Consequences of violating the assumption of independence in the process dissociation procedure: A word fragment completion study.Memory & Cognition.
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 501–518.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 34–50.
Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M., &Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: Process dissociations following elaborative processing and self-generation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 290–303.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author was supported by Research Grant SBR-9420248 from the National Science Foundation.
—Accepted by previous editor, Geoffrey R. Loftus
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hirshman, E. On the logic of testing the independence assumption in the process-dissociation procedure. Mem Cogn 26, 857–859 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201168
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201168