Abstract
Medin, Goldstone, and Markman (1995) recently described a series of parallel effects in similarity and choice. They suggested that similarity and choice are related in a nontrivial way such that choice may entail a similarity judgment to an explicit or constructed ideal. In this paper, the correspondences between similarity and choice were investigated with respect to a phenomenon in similarity known as thecoincidence effect. In coincidence (pronounced “coincide-ence”), two items that match on one dimension but have a large difference on another dimension receive a higher similarity rating than do two items that have only modest differences on both dimensions. We conducted five experiments in order to examine commonalities between similarity and choice processes with respect to coincidence. Four types of tasks were given: similarity ratings, desirability ratings, forced choice similarities (which of two items is most similar to a target), and forced choice preferences (which of two items one would prefer, given a target). We found a main effect for ratings as opposed to forced choices, with ratings showing greater coincidence effects than did choices. Similarity measures tended to produce more coincidence than did preference measures. The overall pattern of results suggests the presence of dimensional weighting processes sensitive to task characteristics and operating somewhat differently for similarity and decision making.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., &Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity.Psychological Review,100, 254–278.
Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., &Markman, A. B. (1995). Comparison and choice: Relations between similarity processes and decision processes.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 1–19.
Simonson, I., &Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion.Journal of Marketing Research,29, 281–295.
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1968). The relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,78 (3, Pt. 2).
Tversky, A., &Gati, I. (1982). Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality.Psychological Review,89, 123–154.
Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science,185, 1124–1131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation for this article was supported by National Science Foundation Grant 92-11277.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaplan, A.S., Medin, D.L. The coincidence effect in similarity and choice. Mem Cogn 25, 570–576 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201130
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201130