Abstract
Estimates of the number of objects in a line are made in many different situations. This paper demonstrates that besides the actual number of dots, aspects of line configuration affect the perceived numerosity of dotted lines. Experiment 1 provides evidence that the highly studied “clutter effect” in distance perception research replicates to the numerosity domain so that lines made up of more segments are perceived to contain more dots. Experiments 2–5 provide nomological validity for the recently proposed “direct distance” effect in distance perceptions by showing that numerosity perceptions are higher the greater the euclidean length between the line end points and by manipulating euclidean length in three orthogonal ways: the relative length of segments (Experiment 2), the angle between segments (Experiment 3), and the general direction of segments (Experiment 4). Experiment 5 conceptually replicates the results of Experiments 2–4 utilizing stimuli-based versus memory-based judgments and a discrimination task. Experiments 6 and 7 extend the research on spatial perception by demonstrating that the use of euclidean length as a source of information is inversely related to line width, with width varied through clutter (Experiment 6) and total line length (Experiment 7). Overall, the results demonstrate that the robustness of the euclidean length effect is contingent on the salience of alternative spatial heuristics-specifically, euclidean width. Theoretical implications are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen, G. L. (1981). A developmental perspective on the effects of “subdividing” macrospatial experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 120–132.
Allen, G. L., &Kirasic, K. C. (1985). Effects of the cognitive organization of route knowledge on judgments of macrospatial distance.Memory & Cognition,13, 218–227.
Allen, G. L., Siegel, A. W., &Rosinski, R. R. (1978). The role of perceptual context in structuring spatial knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 617–630.
Antes, J. R., McBride, R. B., &Collins, J. D. (1988). The effect of a new city traffic route on the cognitive maps of its residents.Environment & Behavior,20, 75–91.
Aoki, T. (1977). On the counting process of patterned dots.Tohoku Psychologica Folia,36, 15–22.
Atkinson, J., Cambell, F. W., &Francis, M. R. (1976a). The dependence of the visual numerosity limit on orientation, color and grouping in the stimulus.Perception,5, 335–344.
Atkinson, J., Cambell, F. W., &Francis, M. R. (1976b). The magic number 4 ± 0: A new look at visual numerosity judgments.Perception,5, 327–334.
Beckwith, M., &Restle, F. (1966). Process of enumeration.Psychological Review,73, 437–444.
Block, R. A. (1982). Temporal judgments and contextual change.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 530–544.
Brosvick, G. M., &Cohen, B. D. (1988). The horizontal-vertical illusion and knowledge of the results.Perceptual & Motor Skills,67, 463–469.
Byrne, R. W. (1979). Memory for urban geography.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,31, 147–154.
Dainoff, M., Miskie, D., Wilson, C., &Crane, P. (1974). Psychophysical measurement of environmental distance. In D. H. Carson (Ed.),Man-environment interactions: Evaluations and associations (EDRA 5 Proceedings). New York: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
Dixon, P. (1978). Numerical comparison processes.Memory & Cognition,6, 454–461.
Finger, F. W., &Spelt, D. K. (1947). The illustration of the horizontalvertical illusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology,37, 243–250.
Freeman, F. N. (1912). Grouped objects as a concrete basis for the number idea.Elementary School Teacher,12, 306–314.
Frith, C. D., &Frith, U. (1972). The solitaire illusion: An illusion of numerosity.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 409–410.
Gelman, R. (1969). Conservation acquisition: A problem of learning to attend to relevant attributes.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,7, 167–187.
Ginsburg, N. (1978). Perceived numerosity, item arrangement, and expectancy.American Journal of Psychology,91, 267–273.
Herman, J. F., Norton, L. M., &Klein, C. A. (1986). Children’s distance estimates in a large-scale environment: A search for the route angularity effect.Environment & Behavior,18, 533–558.
Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., &Reiser, B. J. (1978). Psychology and living space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 47–60.
Kosslyn, S. M., Pick, H. L., &Fariello, G. R. (1974). Cognitive maps in children and men.Child Development,45, 707–716.
Lee, T. R. (1973). Psychology and living space. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds),Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
Luccio, R., &Rodani, M. G. (1983). Illusioni di lunghezza e illusioni di numerosita [Illusions of length and illusions of numerosity].Ricerche di Psicologia,7, 259–265.
Masin, S. C., &Agostini, A. (1991). Handedness and space errors.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,29, 301–303.
McNamara, T. P. (1986). Mental representations of spatial relations.Cognitive Psychology,18, 87–121.
McNamara, T. P., Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. (1984). The mental representation of knowledge acquired from maps.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 723–732.
Morris, R. B., &Rule, S. J. (1988). Sequential judgement effects in magnitude estimation.Canadian Journal of Psychology,42, 69–77.
Nasar, J. L. (1985). Out of sight further from mind: Destination visibility and distance perceptions.Environment & Behavior,17, 627–639.
Newcombe, N., &Liben, L. S. (1982). Barrier effects in the cognitive maps of children and adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,34, 46–58.
Raghubir, P., &Krishna, A. (1996, June). As the crow flies: Bias in consumers’ map-based distance judgments.Journal of Consumer Research,23, 26–39.
Sadalla, E. K., &Magel, S. G. (1980). The perception of traversed distance.Environment & Behavior,12, 65–79.
Sadalla, E. K., &Staplin, L. J. (1980). The perception of traversed distance: Intersections.Environment & Behavior,12, 167–182.
Smitsman, A. W. (1982). Perception of number.International Journal of Behavioral Development,5, 1–31.
Thorndyke, P. W. (1981). Distance estimation from cognitive maps.Cognitive Psychology,13, 526–550.
van Oeffelen, M. P., &Vos, P. G. (1982). Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: Counting by groups.Memory & Cognition,10, 396–404.
van Oeffelen, M. P., &Vos, P. G. (1984). Enumeration of dots: An eye movement analysis.Memory & Cognition,12, 607–612.
Wolters, G., van Kempen, H., &Wijlhuizen, G.-J. (1987). Quantification of small number of dots: Subitizing or pattern recognition.American Journal of Psychology,100, 225–237.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krishna, A., Raghubir, P. The effect of line configuration on perceived numerosity of dotted lines. Mem Cogn 25, 492–507 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201125
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201125