Abstract
In a series of experiments, the masked priming paradigm with very brief prime exposures was used to investigate the role of the syllable in the production of English. Experiment 1 (word naming task) showed a syllable priming effect for English words with clear initial syllable boundaries (such as BALCONY), but no effect with ambisyllabic words targets (such as BALANCE, where the /l/ belongs to both the first and the second syllables). Experiment 2 failed to show such syllable priming effects in the lexical decision task. Experiment 3 demonstrated that for words with clear initial syllable boundaries, naming latencies were faster only when primes formed the first syllable of the target, in comparison with a neutral condition. Experiment 4 showed that the two possible initial syllables of ambisyllabic words facilitated word naming to the same extent, in comparison with the neutral condition. Finally, Experiment 5 demonstrated that the syllable priming effect obtained for CV words with clear initial syllable boundaries (such as DIVORCE) was not due to increased phonological and/or orthographic overlap. These results, showing that the syllable constitutes a unit of speech production in English, are discussed in relation to the model of phonological and phonetic encoding proposed by Levelt and Wheeldon (1994).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adams, M. J. (1981). What good is orthographic redundancy? In O. L. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.),Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology (pp. 197–221). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, J., &Jones, C. (1974). Three theses concerning phonological representations.Journal of Linguistics,10, 1–26.
Bell, A., &Hooper, J. B. (1978). Issues and evidence on syllabic phonology. In A. Bell & J. B. Hooper (Eds.),Syllables and segments (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Bradley, D. C., Sanchez-Casas, R. M., &Garcia-Albea, J. E. (1993). The status of the syllable in the perception of Spanish and English.Language & Cognitive Processes,8, 197–233.
Brown, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience.Psychological Bulletin,109, 204–223.
Brown, R., &McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,55, 325–337.
Bruck, M., Treiman, R., &Caravolas, M. (1995). The syllable’s role in the processing of spoken English: Evidence from a nonword comparison task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 469–479.
Butler, B., &Hains, S. (1979). Individual differences in word recognition latency.Memory & Cognition,7, 68–76.
Corina, D. P. (1992). Syllable priming and lexical representations: Evidence from experiments and simulations. In D. P. Corina (Ed.),Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 779–784). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crompton, A. (1981). Syllables and segments in speech production.Linguistics,17, 663–716.
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., &Segui, J. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 385–400.
Derwing, B. L. (1992). A “pause-break” task for eliciting syllable boundary judgments from literate and illiterate speakers: Preliminary results for five diverse languages.Language & Speech,35, 219–235.
Eriksen, C. W., Pollack, M. D., &Montague, W. E. (1970). Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual coding?Journal of Experimental Psychology,84, 502–507.
Fallows, D. (1981). Experimental evidence for English syllabification and syllable structure.Journal of Linguistics,17, 309–317.
Ferrand, L., &Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,42A, 353–372.
Ferrand, L., &Grainger, J. (1993). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,31, 119–122.
Ferrand, L., &Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 365–382.
Ferrand, L., Grainger, J., &Segui, J. (1994). A study of masked form priming in picture and word naming.Memory & Cognition,22, 431–441.
Ferrand, L., Segui, J., &Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 708–723.
Forster, K. I., &Chambers, S. (1973). Lexical access and naming time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 627–635.
Francis, W. N., &Kučera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Frederiksen, J. R., &Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 361–379.
Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances.Language,47, 27–52.
Fry, D. B. (1964). The function of the syllable.Zeitschrift für Phonetik,17, 215–221.
Fujimura, O., &Lovins, J. B. (1978). Syllables as concatenative phonetic units. In A. Bell & J. B. Hooper (Eds.),Syllables and segments (pp. 107–120). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Grainger, J., &Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 218–233.
Grainger, J., &Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-task comparisons.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 623–647.
Gussenhoven, C. (1986). English plosive allophones and ambisyllabicity.Gramma,10, 119–141.
Henderson, L. (1982).Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.
Hooper, J. B. (1972). The syllable in phonological theory.Language,48, 525–540.
Jacobs, A. M., Grainger, J., &Ferrand, L. (1995). The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1101–1110.
Jared, D., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). Naming multisyllabic words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 92–105.
Kahn, D. (1976).Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Klapp, S. T., Anderson, W. G., &Berrian, R. W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading reconsidered.Journal of Experimental Psychology,100, 368–374.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989).Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations.Cognition,42, 1–22.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1993). Timing in speech production with special reference to word form encoding. In P. Tallal, A. M. Galaburda, R. R. Llinás, & C. von Euler (Eds.),Temporal information processing in the nervous system: Special reference to dyslexia and dysphasia (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 682, pp. 283–295). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Levelt, W. J. M., &Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary?Cognition,50, 239–269.
MacKay, D. G. (1972). The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech.Cognitive Psychology,3, 210–227.
Mehler, J., Dommergues, J., Frauenfelder, U., &Segui, J. (1981). The syllable’s role in speech segmentation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 298–305.
Meijer, P. J. A. (1994).Phonological encoding: The role of suprasegmental structures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nijmegen University.
Meyer, A. S. (1992). Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: Achievements, limitations, and alternatives.Cognition,42, 181–211.
Pulgram, E. (1970).Syllable, word, nexus, cursus. The Hague: Mouton.
Rapp, B. C. (1992). The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 33–53.
Roelofs, A. (1994). One-line versus off-line priming of word-form encoding in spoken word production. In A. Ram & K. Eiselt (Eds.),Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 772–777). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roelofs, A. (1996). Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 854–876.
Romani, C. (1992).The representation of prosodic and syllabic structure in speech production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University.
Segui, J. (1984). The syllable: A basic perceptual unit in speech perception? In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 165–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of visual word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The syllable. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.),The structure of phonological representations (Pt. 2, pp. 337–464). Dordrecht: Foris.
Sevald, C. A., Dell, G. S., &Cole, J. S. (1995). Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas?Journal of Memory & Language,34, 807–820.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1979). Speech errors as evidence for a serial order mechanism in sentence production. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 295–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Solso, R. L., &Juel, C. L. (1980). Position frequency and versatility of bigrams for two- through nine-letter English words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 297–343.
Spoehr, K. T. (1978). Phonological encoding in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 127–142.
Spoehr, K. T. (1981). Word recognition in speech and reading: Toward a single theory of language processing. In P. D. Eimas & J. L. Miller (Eds.),Perspectives on the study of speech (pp. 239–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spoehr, K. T., &Smith, E. E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing.Cognitive Psychology,5, 71–89.
Taft, M. (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS).Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 21–39.
Taft, M., &Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 607–620.
Tousman, S., &Inhoff, A. (1992). Phonology in multisyllabic word recognition.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,21, 525–544.
Treiman, R., &Danis, C. (1988). Syllabification of intervocalic consonants.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 87–104.
Treiman, R., Straub, K., &Lavery, P. (1994). Syllabification of bisyllabic nonwords: Evidence from short-term memory errors.Language & Speech,37, 45–60.
Treiman, R., &Zukowski, A. (1990). Toward an understanding of English syllabification.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 66–85.
Wells, R. (1951). Predicting slips of the tongue.Yale Scientifc Magazine,26, 9–30.
Wheeldon, L. R., &Levelt, W. J. M. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 311–334.
Wijnen, F. (1988). Spontaneous word fragmentations in children: Evidence for the syllable as a unit in speech production.Journal of Phonetics,16, 187–202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferrand, L., Segui, J. & Humphreys, G.W. The syllable’s role in word naming. Mem Cogn 25, 458–470 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201122
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201122