Abstract
Connectives are text devices that signal the relation between adjacent sentences. Recently there has been a surge of research interest in the role played by connectives in on-line processing. The present research tested the hypothesis that connectives will impact on-line processing to the extent that they signal a text event that represents a departure from the continuity of the events stated in the text. In Experiment 1, participants generated sentences to follow a stimulus sentence. An additive, causal, or adversative connective (or no connective) was provided to serve as the first word of the participants’ sentence. Results showed that sentences generated in response to additive or causal connectives depicted text events that were continuous with the stimulus text. In contrast, sentences generated in response to adversative connectives depicted discontinuous text events. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants read coherent sentence pairs containing inappropriately placed additive, causal, or adversative connectives. Support for the continuity hypothesis was found when it was shown that adversative connectives led to the greatest amount of processing disruption, as measured by longer reading time on the postconnective sentence (Experiment 2) and lower ratings of coherence (Experiment 3). Future research in this area is discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Hood, L., Lifter, K., &Fiess, K. (1980). Complex sentences: Acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode.Journal of Child Language,7, 235–261.
Caron, J., Micko, H. C., &Thuring, M. (1988). Conjunctions and the recall of composite sentences.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 309–323.
Francis, W. N., &Kučera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Golding, J. M., Millis, K. M., Hauselt, J., &Sego, S. A. (1994). The effect of connectives and causal relatedness on text comprehension. In R. F. Lorch, Jr., & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.),Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 127–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goldman, S. R., &Murray, J. D. (1992). Knowledge of connectors as cohesion devices in text: A comparative study of native English and ESL speakers.Journal of Educational Psychology,84, 504–519.
Haberlandt, K. (1982). Reader expectations in text comprehension. In J. Le Ny & W. Kintsch (Eds.),Language and comprehension. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Halliday, M. A. K., &Hasan, R. (1976).Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Katz, E. W., &Brent, S. B. (1968). Understanding connectives.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 501–509.
Kintsch, W., &van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review,85, 363–394.
Lintermann-Rygh, I. (1985). Connector density: An indicator of essay quality.Text,5, 347–357.
McClure, E., &Geva, E. (1983). The development of the cohesive use of adversative conjunctions in discourse.Discourse Processes,6, 411–432.
Millis, K. K., Graesser, A. C., &Haberlandt, K. (1993). The impact of connectives for memory for expository texts.Applied Cognitive Psychology,7, 317–339.
Millis, K. K., &Just, M. A. (1994). The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 128–147.
Murray, J. D. (1994). Logical connectives and local coherence. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.),Sources of cohesion in text comprehension (pp. 107–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Peterson, C., &McCabe, A. (1987). The connective and: Do older children use it less as they learn other connectives?Journal of Child Language,14, 375–381.
Segal, E. M., Duchan, J. F., &Scott, P. J. (1991). The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults’ interpretations of simple stories.Discourse Processes,14, 27–54.
Tukey, J. W. (1977).Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murray, J.D. Connectives and narrative text: The role of continuity. Mem Cogn 25, 227–236 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201114
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201114