Abstract
Past research indicates that short-term memory can be immune to the effects of proactive interference (PI). Past research also indicates that immunity to PI is found only in those circumstances where phonemic representations of to-be-remembered items are present and provide discriminative information. The first three experiments demonstrate the existence of a further boundary condition. PI is observed only if interfering and target items are subsumed by the same cue. This finding suggests that short-term recall, like long-term recall, is cue dependent. Cuing effects are further explored in two experiments that manipulate category dominance. The finding that category dominance effects parallel PI effects strongly suggests that retrieval cues play a critical role in short-term recall.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1974). Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory.Cognitive Psychology,6, 451–474.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., &Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 575–589.
Brown, J. A. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,10, 12–21.
Chappell, M., &Humphreys, M. S. (1994). An auto-associative neural network for sparse representations: Analysis and application to models of recognition and cued recall.Psychological Review,101, 103–128.
Conrad, R. (1967). Interference or decay over short retention intervals.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 49–54.
Craik, F. I. M. (1991). Peace pipes around the TODAM pole: A puff for short-term memory. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.)Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 195–203). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Crowder, R. G. (1989). Modularity and dissociations in memory systems. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honor of Endel Tulving (pp. 271–294). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dempster, F. N., &Cooney, J. B. (1982). Individual differences in digit span, susceptibility to proactive interference, and aptitude/achievement test scores.Intelligence,6, 399–416.
Dillon, R. F., &Bittner, L. A. (1975). Analysis of retrieval cues and release from proactive inhibition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 616–622.
Estes, W. K. (1972). An associative basis for coding and organization in memory. In A.W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory (pp. 161–190). Washington, DC: Winston.
Estes, W. K. (1973). Phonemic encoding and rehearsal in short-term memory for letter strings.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 360–372.
Estes, W. K. (1991). On types of item coding and source of recall in short-term memory. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.),Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 155–173). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gardiner, J. M., Craik, F. I. M., &Birtwistle, J. (1972). Retrieval cues and release from proactive inhibition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 778–783.
Gorfein, D. S. (1987). Explaining context effects on short-term memory. In D. S. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),Memory and learning: The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference (pp. 153–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Halford, G. S., Maybery, M. T., &Bain, J. D. (1988). Set-size effects in primary memory: An age-related capacity limitation?Memory & Cognition,16, 480–487.
Humphreys, M. S., &Tehan, G. (1992). A simultaneous examination of recency and cuing effects. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.),From learning theory to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 143–159). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Humphreys, M. S., Wiles, J., &Bain, J. D. (1993). Memory retrieval with two cues: Think of intersecting sets. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuropsychology—A Silver Jubilee (pp. 489–508). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnson, G. J. (1991). A distinctiveness model of serial learning.Psychological Review,98, 204–217.
Jones, D. M. (1993). Objects, streams and threads of auditory attention. In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.),Attention: Selection, awareness and control (pp. 87–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keppel, G., &Underwood, B. J. (1962). Proactive inhibition in shortterm retention of single items.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,1, 153–161.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lee, C. L., &Estes, W. K. (1977). Order and position in primary memory for letter strings.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 395–418.
Lewandowsky, S., &Murdock, B. B. (1989). Memory for serial order.Psychological Review,96, 25–57.
Lewis, C. H., &Anderson, J. R. (1976). Interference with real world knowledge.Cognitive Psychology,7, 311–355.
McEvoy, C. L., &Nelson, D. L. (1982). Category name and instance norms for 106 categories of various sizes.American Journal of Psychology,95, 581–634.
McNicol, D. (1978). Initial codes for order in memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,30, 681–691.
Nairne, J. S. (1988). A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall.Memory & Cognition,16, 343–352.
Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.
Nelson, D. L. (1989). Implicitly activated knowledge and memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 369–387). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nelson, D. L., &Friedrich, M. A. (1980). Encoding and cuing sounds and senses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 717–731.
Nelson, D. L., &McEvoy, C. L. (1979). Encoding context and set size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 292–314.
Nelson, D. L., Schreiber, T. A., &McEvoy, C. L. (1992). Processing implicit and explicit representations.Psychological Review,99, 322–348.
Peterson, L. R., &Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual items.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 193–198.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Cook, J. R. (1978). Short-term forgetting of item and order information.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 189–218.
Tehan, G., &Humphreys, M. S. (1995). Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference.Memory & Cognition,23, 181–191.
Tell, P. M. (1972). The role of certain acoustic and semantic factors at short and long retention intervals.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 555–564.
Walling, J. R., McEvoy, C. L., Oth, J. E., &Nelson, D. L. (1984).The University of South Florida rhyme category norms. Unpublished manuscript, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Watkins, M. J. (1975). Inhibition in recall with extralist “cues.”Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 294–303.
Watkins, M. J. (1981). Engrams as cuegrams and forgetting as cue overload: A cueing approach to the structure of memory. In C. R. Puff (Ed.),The structure of memory (pp. 347–372) New York: Academic Press.
Watkins, O. C., &Watkins, M. J. (1975). Build-up of proactive inhibition as a cue overload effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,104, 442–452.
Wickens, D. D. (1972). Characteristics of word encoding. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory (pp. 191–215). Washington, DC: Winston.
Wickens, D. D., Born, G. D., &Allen, C. K. (1963). Proactive inhibition and item similarity in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,2, 440–445.
Wickens, D. D., Moody, M. J., &Dow, R. (1981). The nature of timing of the retrieval process and of interference effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 1–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Australian Research Council Grant A79531860. Several of the experiments reported here are part of the first author’s doctoral dissertation at the University of Queensland.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tehan, G., Humphreys, M.S. Cuing effects in short-term recall. Mem Cogn 24, 719–732 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201097
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201097