Abstract
It has been claimed (V. Coltheart, Laxon, Rickard, & Elton, 1988) that learners as well as skilled readers use phonology for multiple functions in reading-for-meaning tasks. This claim was examined using lexical decision and sentence evaluation tasks. It was found in the first experiment that the type of instruction learners had received determined whether there was prelexical use of phonology in responding to items out of sentence context. Type of instruction had no effect when the items were in context. In the second experiment, performances on a homophone sentence evaluation task and a homophone semantic decision task, which excluded sentence processing, were examined. The results suggest that phonology served the function of access to lexical meanings in addition to any function in postlexical sentence processing. The obtained relationships between relative frequencies of the presented and unpresented homophone mates and item accuracy on these tasks were inconsistent with exclusive use of “direct access” but consistent with access of lexical meanings via phonology and application of a “spelling-check” procedure when multiple homophonic meanings are activated.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 241–246.
Baron, J. (1977). Mechanisms for pronouncing printed words: Use and acquisition. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 175–216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Besner, D. (1987). Phonology, lexical access in reading, and articulatory suppression: A critical review. QuarterlyJournal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 467–478.
Brimer, M. A., &Dunn, L. M. (1968).English picture vocabulary test 2. Newnham, Glasgow: Educational Evaluation.
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., &Richman, B. (1971).The American Heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M. (1980). Reading, phonological recoding, and deep dyslexia. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Deep dyslexia (pp. 197–226). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., &Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches.Psychological Review,100, 589–608.
Coltheart, V., Avons, S. E., Masterson, J., &Laxon, V. J. (1991). The role of assembled phonology in reading comprehension.Memory & Cognition,19, 387–400.
Coltheart, V., Avons, S. E., &Trollope, J. (1990). Articulatory suppression and phonological codes in reading for meaning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,42A, 375–399.
Coltheart, V., &Laxon, V. J. (1990). The development of phonological mediation in reading comprehension.Language & Cognitive Processes,5, 81–104.
Coltheart, V., Laxon, V. [J.], Rickard, M., &Elton, C. (1988). Phonological recoding in reading for meaning by adults and children.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 387–397.
Daneman, M., &Stainton, M. (1991). Phonological recoding in silent reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 618–632.
Doctor, E. A., &Coltheart, M. (1980). Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning.Memory & Cognition,8, 195–209.
France, N. (1981).The primary reading test (rev. ed.). Windsor, Berkshire, U.K.: NFER-Nelson.
Holligan, C., &Johnston, R. S. (1988). The use of phonological information by good and poor readers in memory and reading tasks.Memory & Cognition,16, 522–532.
Jared, D., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,120, 358–394.
Johnston, R. S., Rugg, M. D., &Scott, T. (1987). The influence of phonology on good and poor readers when reading for meaning.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 57–68.
Johnston, R. S., Rugg, M. D., &Scott, T. (1988). Pseudohomophone effects in 8 and 11 year old good and poor readers.Journal of Research in Reading,11, 110–119.
Johnston, R. S., &Thompson, G. B. (1989). Is dependence on phonological information in children’s reading a product of instructional approach?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,48, 131–145.
Kleiman, G. M. (1975). Speech recoding in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 323–339.
Liberman, I., Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I., &Shankweiler, D. (1980). Orthography and the beginning reader. In J. F. Kavanagh & R. L. Venezky (Eds.),Orthography, reading, and dyslexia (pp. 137–153). Baltimore: University Park Press.
McCusker, L. X., Hillinger, M. L., &Bias, R. G. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading.Psychological Bulletin,89, 217–245.
Patterson, K., &Coltheart, V. (1987). Phonological processes in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 421–447). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., &Rubenstein, M. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 645–657.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1989). Are words represented by nodes?Memory & Cognition,17, 511–524.
Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 744–774.
Taft, M. (1982). An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules?Memory & Cognition,10, 465–474.
Thompson, G. B. (1993). Reading instruction for the initial years in New Zealand schools. In G. B. Thompson, W. E. Tunmer, & T. Nicholson (Eds.),Reading acquisition processes (pp. 148–154). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.
Thompson, G. B., &Fletcher-Flinn, C. M. (1993). A theory of knowledge sources and procedures for reading acquisition. In G. B. Thompson, W. E. Tunmer, & T. Nicholson (Eds.),Reading acquisition processes (pp. 20–73). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.
Thompson, G. B., &Johnston, R. S. (1993). The effects of type of instruction on processes of reading acquisition. In G. B. Thompson, W. E. Tunmer, & T. Nicholson (Eds.),Reading acquisition processes (pp. 74–90). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.
Treiman, R., Freyd, J. J., &Baron, J. (1983). Phonological recoding and use of spelling-sound rules in reading of sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 682–700.
Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and meaning.Memory & Cognition,15, 181–198.
Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., &Hale, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 371–386.
Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., &Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.Psychological Review,97, 488–522.
Weber, R. (1970). A linguistic analysis of first-grade reading errors.Reading Research Quarterly,5, 427–451.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by grants to R.S.J. and G.B.T. from the British Council, New Zealand, and by grants to G.B.T. from the Internal Grants Committee, Victoria University of Wellington.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnston, R.S., Thompson, G.B., Fletcher-Flinn, C.M. et al. The functions of phonology in the acquisition of reading: Lexical and sentence processing. Mem Cogn 23, 749–766 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200927
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200927