Abstract
Altmann, Garnham, and Dennis (1992) explored contextual influences on syntactic ambiguity resolution by monitoring eye movements during reading. In order to resolve a conflict of interpretation given that the different eye movement measures yielded different patterns, we introduced a regression-contingent analysis of reading times, separating trials according to whether the eyes departed from the region of interest with a leftward (regressive) or rightward movement. R,ayner and Sereno (1994) argue that various assumptions which they claim underlie the motivation for introducing the regression-contingent measure are in fact flawed. In this paper I demonstrate that these assumptions are incorrectly ascribed to us (while agreeing that they are incorrect), and that Rayner and Sereno's re-analysis oF an earlier study by Rayner, Garrod, and Perfetti (1992) neither questions nor threatens the generalizability of the regression-contingent measure, Finally, I discuss same of the uncertainties surrounding the interpretation of first-pass reading times which further motivate the measure we adopted in Altrnann et al.'s (1992) study.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Altmann, G. T. M. (1988). Ambiguity, parsing strategies, and computational models.Language & Cognitive Processes,3, 73–97.
Altmann, G. T. M., Garnham, A., &Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 685–712.
Altmann, G. T. M., Garnham, A., &Henstra, J. A. (I994). Effects of syntax in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a structurebased proposal mechanism.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 209–216.
Altmann, G. T. M., &Steedman, M. J. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing.Cognition,30, 191–238.
Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Garrod, S., &Rayner, K. (1992). Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their lunits.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 293–314.
Crain, S., &Steedman, M. J. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser. In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.),Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 320–358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferreira, F., &Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 348–368.
Frazier, L. (1979).On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Frazier, L., &Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences.Cognitive Psychology,14, 178–210.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review,99, 122–149.
Rayner, K., Carlson, M., &Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 358–374.
Rayner, K., Garrod, S., &Perfetti, C. A. (1992). Discourse influences during parsing are delayed.Cognition,45, 109–139.
Rayner, K., &Sereno, S. C. (1994). Regressive eyemovements and sentence parsing: On theuse of regression-contingent analyses.Memory & Cognition,22, 281–285.
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., &Clifton, C. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes.Language & Cognitive Processes,4, SI21–50.
Steendman, M. J., &Altmann, G. T. M. (1989). Ambiguity in context: A reply.Language & Cognitive Processes,4, SI105–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
—Accepted by previous editor. Margaret Jean Intons-Peterson
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Altmann, G.T.M. Regression-contingent analyses of eye movements during sentence processing: Reply to Rayner and Sereno. Mem Cogn 22, 286–290 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200856
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200856