Abstract
In 14 experiments, a dissociation occurred between subjects' accuracy on a forced-choice recognition test and their confidence in their choice. Nature pictures (e.g., Lake A) were shown. Later, the subjects were asked to choose the picture that they remembered, given the target (Lake A) and a navel picture (Lake C) as alternatives, and rated their confidence in their choice. When the subjects also studied a related picture (Lake B), their accuracy often decreases while their confidence increased. The dissociation cannot be explained by signal detection theories of recognition, which assume that strength determines both accuracy in a forced-choice test and confidence. Instead, familiarity with general themes may give people the illusion that they are accurately remembering details.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Chandler, C. C. (1989). Specific retroactive interference in modified recognition tests: Evidence for an unknowncause of interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 256–265
Chandler, C. C. (1991). How memory for an event is influenced by related events Interference in modified recognition tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 115–125
Chandler, C. C. (1993). Accessing related events increases retroactive interference in a matching recognition test.Joumol of Experimental Psvchology Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 967–974.
Costermans, J., Lories, G., &Ansay, C. (1992). Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering. The weight of inferential processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 142–150
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1974).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley
Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., &Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attribution In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik. (Eds.),Varities of menrory and consciousness (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Koriat, A., &Lieblich, I. (1977). A study of memory pointers.Acta Psychnlogica,41, 151–164
Lehmann, E. L. (1975). Nonparametrics. Statistical methods based on ranks. San Francisco Holden-Day.
Lindsay, D. S. (in press). Memory source monitoring and eyewitness testimony in D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Togha (Eds.), Adult eyexztness testimony Current trends and developments. New York Cambridge University Press
Lindsay, R. C. L., Wells, G. L., &Rumpel, C. M. (1981). Can pcople detect eyewitness-identification accuracy within and across situations?Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 79–89.
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G. &Burins.H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory,4, 19–31
Luus, C. A. S.,& Wells, G. L. (1992, June). Sacial influences on eyewitness confidence. Poster presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, San Diego. CA
MacLeod, C. M., &Nelson, T. O. (1976). A nonmonotonic lag function for false alarms to associates.American Journal of Psychology.89, 127–135
Marsh, R. L., &Bower, G. H. (1993). Eliciting cryptomnesia Unconscious plagiarism in a puzzle task.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 673–688
Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., &Ioaquim, S. G. (1493). The cue familiarity heuristic in metacognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 851–861
Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Write, D. M., Steinberg, J., Towves, B. D., &Anderson, D. (1990). Cognition and metacognition at extreme altitudes on Mount Everest.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,119, 367–374
Nelson, T. O., McSpadden, M., Fromme, K., &Marlatt, G. A. (1986). Effects of alcohol intoxication on metamemory and on retrieval from long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,115, 247–254
Nelson, T. O., Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.).The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol 26, pp 125–173) New York: Academic Press
Peterson, D. K., &Pitz, G. F. (1988). Confidence, uncertainty, and the use of information.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 85–92
Reder, L. M. (1988). Strategic control of retrieval strategies. In G. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol 22, pp. 227–259) New York. Acadenic Press
Reder, L. M., &Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cogninon,18, 435–451.
Ryan, R. H., &Geiselman, R. E. (1991). Effects of biased information on the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,29, 7–9
Shimamura, A. P. &Squire, L. R. (1986). Memory and metamemory A study of the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon in amnesic patients Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 452–460
Shimamura, A. P. &Squire, L. R. (1988). Long-tern memory in amnesia: Cued recall, recognition memory, and confidence ratings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 763–770.
Snodgranss, J. G., Levy-Berger, G., &Haydon, M. (1985). Human experimental psychology. New York: Oxford Urvversity Press.
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford. Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press
Watkins, M. J., &Kerkar, S. P. (1985). Recall of a twice-presented item without recall of either presentation Generic memory for events.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 666–678.
Wells, G. L., Ferguson, T. J., &Lindsay, R. C. L. (1981). The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of factJournal of Applied Psychology,66, 688–696
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Portions of this study were reported at the 7992 meeting of the Amencan Psychological Society in San Diego, California.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chandler, C.C. Studying related pictures can reduce accuracy, but increase confidence, in a modified recognition test. Mem Cogn 22, 273–280 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200854
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200854