Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Published: March 1994

Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world

  • Roger N. Shepard1 

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review volume 1, pages 2–28 (1994)Cite this article

  • 1606 Accesses

  • 189 Citations

  • 4 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The universality, invariance, and elegance of principles governing the universe may be reflected in principles of the minds that have evolved in that universe—provided that the mental principles are formulated with respect to the abstract spaces appropriate for the representation of biologically significant objects and their properties. (1)Positions andmotions of objects conserve theirshapes in the geometrically fullest and simplest way when represented as points and connecting geodesic paths in the six-dimensional manifold jointly determined by the Euclidean group of three-dimensional space and the symmetry group of each object. (2)Colors of objects attain constancy when represented as points in a three-dimensional vector space in which each variation in natural illumination is cancelled by application of its inverse from the three-dimensional linear group of terrestrial transformations of the invariant solar source. (3)Kinds of objects support optimal generalization and categorization when represented, in an evolutionarily shaped space of possible objects, as connected regions with associated weights determined by Bayesian revision of maximum-entropy priors.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Anderson, I. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization.Psychological Review,98, 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attneaye, F., &Block, G. (1973). Apparent movement in tridimensional space.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzano, G. J. (1980) A group-theoretic description of twelvefold and microtonal pitch systems.Computer Music Journal,4, 66–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bethell-Fox, C., &Shepard, R. N. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,14, 12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brill, M. H. (1978). A device for performing illummant-invarant assesstnent of chromatic relations.Journal of Theoretical Biology,78, 473–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchsbaum, G. (1980). A spatial processor model for object color perception.Journal of the Franklin Institution,310, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesen, C., Larsen, A., &Farrell, J. E. (1983) Visual apparent movement: Transformations of size and orientation.Perception,12, 549–558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, E. H., &Shepard, R. N. (1990a). Psychologically simple motions as geodesic paths: I. Asymmetric objects.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,34, 127–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, E. H., &Shepard, R. N. (1990b). Psychologically simple motions as geodesic paths II. Symmetric objects.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,34, 189–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D., &Chang, J.-J. (1970) Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of Eckart-Young decomposition.Psychometrika,35, 283–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chasles, M. (1830). Note sur les propertiétés génerales du système de deux corpes semblables entrèeux et placés d’une manièr quelconque dans l’espaces; et sur le déplacement fini ou infiniment pent d’un corps solide libre [A note on the general properties of a system of two similar bodies arbitrarily positioned in space; and on the finite or infinitely small displacement of an unconstrained solid body].Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques, Férussac,14, 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. A. (1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes.Cognitive Psychology,7, 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. A. (1976). Demonstrations of a mental analog of an external rotation.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. A., &Shepard, R. N. (1984, December). Turning something over in the mindScientific American, pp 106–114.

  • Corbin, H. H. (1942)The perception of grouping and apparent movement in visual depth (Archives of Psychology, No. 273). New York.

  • Curtis, D. W., Paulos, M. A., &Rule, S. J. (1973). Relation between disjunctive reaction time and stimulus difference.Journal of Experimental Psychology,99, 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, G. (1954). Dimensions of color vision.Journal of Psychology,38, 467–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright, J. T. (1972) A virtuoso isopod: Circa-lunar rhythms and their tidal fine structure.Journal of Comparative Physiology,77, 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. E. (1983). Visual transformations underlying apparent movement.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. E., &Shepard, R. N. (1981). Shape, orientation, and apparent rotational motion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. H. (1975). Visual apparent motion of some preferred paths in the rotation group SO(3).Biological Cybernetics,18, 81–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations.Psychological Review,94, 427438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freyd, J. J., &Jones, K. T. (in press). Representational momentum for a spiral path.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition.

  • Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979).The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, M. A. (1991) Stimulus generalization and representation in adaptive network models of category learning.Psychological Science,2, 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. F. Jr. (1961). Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology,62, 272–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L., &Kalish, H. I. (1956). Discriminability and stimulus generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 79–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hering, E. (1964).Outlines of a theory of the light sense (M. Hurvich & D. Jameson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1887)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurvich, L. M., &Jameson, D. (1957). An opponent-process theory of color vision.Psychological Review,64, 384–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1950)The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. (Original edition published 1890)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes, E. T. (1978). Where do we stand on maximum entropy? In R. D. Levine & M. Tribus (Eds.),The maximum entraps formalism (pp 15–118). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, D. B., McAdam, D. L., &Wyszecki, G. (1964) Spectral distribution of typical daylight as a function of correlated color temperature.Journal of the Optical Society of America,54, 1031–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1931). Die Wahrnehmung von Bewegung. In A. Bethe, et al. (Eds.),Handbook der normalen und pathologische Physiologie (Vol. 12: Pt 2, pp 1166–1214) Berlin: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1935)Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolers, P. A., &Powerantz, J. R. (1971) Figurai change in apparent motion.Journal of Experimental Psychology,87, 99–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korte, A. (1915) Kinematoskopische Untersuchungen.Zettschrift für Psychologie,72, 193–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D. H. (1975a). Color measurement and color theory: I. Representation theorem for Grassmann structures.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,12, 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D. H. (1975b). Color measurement and color theory: II Opponent-colors theory.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,12, 304–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, C. L., &Kessler, F. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys.Psychological Review,89, 334–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrtka,29, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, E. H., &McCann, J. J. (1971). Lightness and retinex theory.Journal of the Optical Society of America,61, 1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leyton, M. (1992).Symmetry, causality, mand. Cambridge, MA: MTT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhead, G. R. (1966). Effects of dimensional redundancy on visual discrimination.Journal of Experimental Psychology,72, 95–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, L. T. (1986) Evaluation of linear models of surface spectral reflectance with small numbers of parameters.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,3, 1673–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, L. T. &Wandell, B. A. (1986). Color constancy. A method for recovering surface spectral reflectance.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,3, 29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marimont, D. H., &Wandell, B. A. (1992). Linear models of surface and illuminant spectra.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,9, 1905–1913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBeath, M. K., &Shepard, R. N. (1989). Apparent motion between shapes differing in location and orientation. A window technique for estimating path curvature.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, M. (1983, April). Intuitive physics.Scientific American, pp. 122–130.

  • Metzler, J., &Shepard, R. N. (1974) Transformational studies of the internal representation of three-dimensional objects. In R. Solso (Ed.),Theories of cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 147–201). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. F., &Shepard, R. N. (1993). An objective criterion for apparent motion based on phase discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception &Performance,19, 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myung, I. J. (in press). Maximum entropy interpretation of decision bound and context models of categorization.Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

  • Noll, A. M. (1965). Computer-generated three-dimensional movies.Computers & Animation,14, 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity scaling and cognitive process models.Annual Review of Psychology,43, 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M.,Gluck, M A.,Palmeri, T J , McKinlev, S. C , & Glauthier, P. (in press). Comparing models of rule-based classification learning; A replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961).Memory & Cognition.

  • Nosofsky, R. M., Kruschke, J. K., &McKinley, S. (1992) Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogasawara, J. (1936). Effect of apparent separation on apparent movement.Japanese Journal of Psychology,11, 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Profeitt, D. R., &Gilden, D. L. (1989). Understanding natural dynamics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 384–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, D. R., Gilden, D. L., Kaiser, M. K., &Whelan, S. M. (1988) The effect of configurai orientation on perceived trajectory in apparent motion.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 465–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, D. R., Kaiser, M. K., &Whelan, S. (1990). Understanding wheel dynamics.Cognitive Psychology,22, 342–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, C., &Shepard, R. N. (1977) Spatio-temporal probing of apparent rotational movement.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I., Wheeler, D., &Tudor, L. (1989). Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints?Cognitive Psychology,21, 185–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., &Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology,8, 382–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. (1988). Analogy by similarity. In D. H. Helman (Ed.),Analogical reasoning (pp. 251–269). New York: Kluwcr Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sälström, P. (1973). Colour and physics: Some remarks concerning the physical aspects of human color vision.Institute of Physics Report 73-09.

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication.Bell System Technical Journal,27, 379–423. 623–655. Reprinted in C. E. Shannon, & W. Weaver (Eds.) (1949).The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1962a). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I.Psychometrika,27, 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1962b). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II.Psychometrika,27, 219–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1964a). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,1, 54–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1964b). Circularity m judgments of relative pitch.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,6, 2346–2353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1965). Approximation to uniform gradients of generalization by monotone transformations of scale. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.),Stimulus generalization (pp 94–110). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1978). The circumplex and related topological manifolds in the study of perception. In S. Shye (Ed.),Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences (pp. 29–80) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1980). Multidimensional scahng, tree-fitting, and clustering.Science,210, 390–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1981a, August).Discrimination and classification: A search for psychological laws. Presidential address to the Division of Experimental Psychology of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.

  • Shepard, R. N. (1981b). Psychophysical complementarity. In M. Kubovy & J. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 279–341). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1982) Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch.Psychological Review,89, 305–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1983). Demonstrations of circular components of pitch.Journal of the Audio Engineering Society,31, 641–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1984) Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming.Psychological Review,91, 417–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1987a). Evolution of a mesh between principles of the mind and regularities of the world. In J. Dupré (Ed.),The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality (pp. 251–275). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1987b). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.Science,237, 1317–1323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1988). The role of transformation in spatial cognition. In J. Stiles-Davis, M. Kritchevsky, & U. Bellugi (Eds.),Spatial cognition: Brain bases and development (pp. 81–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1989, August).A law of generalization and connectionist learning. Plenary address to the Cognitive Science Society, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1990). A possible evolutionary basis for trichromacy. InProceedings of the SPIE/SPSE Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and technology, 1250. Perceiving, measuring, and using color (pp. 301–309). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1991). Integrality versus separability of stimulus dimensions: From art early convergence of evidence to a proposed theoretical basis. In G. R. Lockhead & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perception of structure (pp. 57–71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1992). The perceptual organization of colors: An adaptation to the regularities of the terrestrial world? In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.),The adapted mind. Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 495–532). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1993). On the physical basis, linguistic representation, and conscious experience of colors. In G. Harman (Ed.),Con ceptions of the mind (pp. 217–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Carroll, J. D. (1966). Parametric representation of nonlinear data structures. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Multivariate analysis (pp. 561–592). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Chang, J. J. (1963). Stimulus generalization in the learning of classifications.Journal of Experimental Psychology,65, 94–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Cooper, L. A. (1992). Representation of colors m the blind, color blind, and normally sighted.Psychological Science,3, 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Farrell, J. E. (1985). Representation of the orientations of shapes.Acta Psychologica,59, 104–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N.,Hovland, C. I , &Jenkins, H. M. (1961) Learning and memorization of classifications.Psychological Monographs,75 (13, Whole No. 517).

  • Shepard, R. N., &Judd, S. A. (1976). Perceptual illusion of rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science,191, 952–954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Kannappan, S. (1991). Toward a connectionist implementation of a theory of generalization.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,3, 665–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., Kilpatrick, D. W., &Cunningham, J. P. (1975). The internal representation of numbers.Cognitive Psychology,7, 82–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science,171, 701–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., &Tenenbaum, J. (1991, November).Connectionist modeling of multidimensional generalization. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Francisco.

  • Shepard, R. N., &Zare, S. (1983). Path-guided apparent motion.Science,220, 632–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, S., &Metzler, D. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrar, M., &Shepard, R. N. (1990). Comparison of cube rotations about axes inclined relative to the environment or to the cube.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, P., &Adelson, E. H. (1993). Recovering reflectance and illumination in a world of painted polyhedra. InProceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computer Vision (pp.156–163). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. (1991). Physical knowledge in infancy. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.),The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 133–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P. M., &Miller, G. F. (1991). On the sympatric origin of species: Mercurial mating in the quicksilver model. In R. K. Belew & L. B. Booker (Eds.),Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (pp. 547–554) San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga, S., &Wandell, B. (1989). Standard surface-reflectance model and illuminant estimation.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,6, 576–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien uber des Sehen von Bewegung.Zeitschrift für Psychologie,61, 161–265 Translated in part in T. Shipley (Ed.) (1961),Classics in psychology (pp. 1032–1089). New York: Philosophical Library

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948).Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, A. T. (1980).The geometry of biological time. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Building 420, 94305-2130, Stanford, CA

    Roger N. Shepard

Authors
  1. Roger N. Shepard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Successive approximations to this paper have been presented in three invited talks: (1) “How the mind reflects the world,” D. O. Hebb lecture, McGill University, September 29, 1989; (2) “Can natural selection yield universal principles of mind?” in the symposium Evolution of Cognitive Functions in Ecological-Cultural Context, Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., February 18, 1991; and (3) “How the mind reflects the world,” Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Society, Chicago, June 27, 1993. The research and the drafting of this article were supported by National Science Foundation Grant DBS-9021648. Final revisions were supported, as well, by the Santa Fe Institute, and benefited significantly from interdisciplinary discussions with many scientists there, as well as from the expert editorial assistance of my Stanford secretary Kim Saccio. Other colleagues who have especially contributed to or influenced the particular work reviewed here include Eloise Carlton, Lynn Cooper, Leda Cosmides, Joyce Farrell, Jennifer Freyd. Sherryl Judd. Laurence Maloney, Michael McBeath, Jacqueline Meteler, Geoffrey Miller, In Jae Myung, Robert Nosofsky, Margaret Shiffrar, Joshua Tenenbuam, Brian Wandell, and Susan Zare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shepard, R.N. Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1, 2–28 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200759

Download citation

  • Received: 27 July 1993

  • Accepted: 12 November 1993

  • Issue Date: March 1994

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200759

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Mental Rotation
  • Apparent Motion
  • Rigid Motion
  • Color Constancy
  • Rigid Transformation
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 89.238.176.4

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.