Abstract
This study was undertaken to examine the effects of strategic schema-acquisition tasks (problem comparison or problem construction) and the method of principle explanation (abstract or embedded principle method) on schema acquisition. Ninety-eight subjects studied a set of problems in probability, presented according to either method of principle explanation. Half the subjects in each principle-explanation group were then asked to compare analogous problems, and the rest constructed new analogous problems. To determine whether subjects generalized problem schemas, they were given new analogous problems to solve. The results showed that when the abstract principle method was used, schema acquisition was better in problem comparison; but with the embedded principle method, schema acquisition was better in problem construction. Results were discussed in relation to the importance of some fit between the presentation of problem information and the processes that will draw from or build on this information in tasks designed to allow novice problem solvers to acquire advanced problem representations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bassok, M. (1990). Transfer of domain-specific problem-solving procedures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 522–533.
Bassok, M., Chase, V. M., &Martin, S. A. (1998). Adding apples and oranges: Alignment of semantic and formal knowledge.Cognitive Psychology,35, 99–134.
Bassok, M., &Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Information transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 153–166.
Bernardo, A. B. I. (1994). Problem-specific information and the development of problem-type schemata.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 379–395.
Bernardo, A. B. I. (1998). Language format and analogical transfer among bilingual problem solvers in the Philippines.International Journal of Psychology,33, 33–44.
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2001). Promoting analogical transfer in math problem solving using analogical problem construction.Educational Psychology,21, 137–150.
Blessing, S. B., &Ross, B. H. (1996). Content effects in problem categorization and problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 792–810.
Catrambone, R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1147–1156.
Chi, M. T., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., &Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems.Cognitive Psychology,14, 145–182.
Cummins, D. D. (1992). Role of analogical reasoning in induction of problem categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1103–1124.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction’ in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
Medin, D. L., &Ross, B. H. (1989). The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem solving, and induction. In R. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 189–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 510–520.
Novick, L. R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 398–415.
Reed, S. K., Ackinclose, C. C., &Voss, A. A. (1990). Selecting analogous problems: Similarity versus inclusiveness.Memory & Cognition,18, 83–98.
Reeves, L. M., &Weisberg, R. W. (1994). The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer.Psychological Bulletin,115, 381–400.
Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 629–639.
Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and the use of earlier problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 458–468.
Ross, B. H., &Kennedy, P. T. (1990). Generalizing from the use of earlier examples in problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 42–55.
Ross, B. H., &Kilbane, M. C. (1997). Effects of principle explanation and superficial similarity on analogical mapping in problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 427–440.
Spencer, R. M., &Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Context-dependent effects on analogical transfer.Memory & Cognition,14, 442–449.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a Spencer Postdoctoral Research Fellowship awarded to the author by the National Academy of Education, United States of America. The paper was completed while the author was a Visiting Scholar at the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Leuven University, Belgium, and with partial support from the College of Education Research Fund, De La Salle University, Manila.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernardo, A.B.I. Principle explanation and strategic schema abstraction in problem solving. Memory & Cognition 29, 627–633 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200463
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200463