Abstract
Little is known about the heuristics people use in evaluating the degree to which they control events. The DOS-basedContiception program allows users to independently set the extent to which subjects’ actions are necessary and sufficient (the two components of contingency) to cause a change in an animated display. Up to four subject actions (keypresses) can each cause up to four dimensions of the display to change according to independently set contingencies. The task within which subjects judge their control involves interacting with the display in real time. To facilitate modeling of the possible algorithms used by different groups of subjects or under different conditions, the program provides several calculations of contingency magnitude and algebraic rules upon which the literature suggests subjects might base their control judgments. The program also allows sessions (trial sequences) to be saved and provides raw and summarized data output.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allan, L. G. (1980). A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,15, 147–149.
Allan, L. G., &Jenkins, H. M. (1983). The effect of representations of binary variables on judgment of influence.Learning & Motivation,14, 381–405.
Alloy, L. B., &Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 441–485.
Benassi, V. A., &Mahler, H. I. M. (1985). Contingency judgments by depressed college students: Sadder but not always wiser.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,49, 1323–1329.
Cain, M. (1992).The development of contingency perception and perceived control. Unpublished honors thesis, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS.
Cain, M., &McLeod, P. J. (1992). Social context and the development of perceived control.Canadian Psychology,33, 375.
Fuller, M. (1992).Contingency perception and beliefs about control in students with learning disabilities. Unpublished master’s thesis, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS.
Fuller, M., &McLeod, P. J. (in press). Judgements of control over a contingently responsive animation by students with and without learning disabilities.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science.
Hume, D. (1978).A treatise of human nature (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press. (Originally published 1739)
Jenkins, H. M., &Ward, W. C. (1965). Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes.Psychological Monographs,79, (1, Whole No. 594).
Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,32, 311–328.
McLeod, P. J. (1993).Judgments of control over a contingently responsive animation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain Behaviour and Cognitive Sciences, Toronto.
McLeod, P. J. (1994).Age differences in judgments of control. Poster presented at the meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Amsterdam.
Mercier, P.,Sweet, L., &Cheng, Y. (1992).The computation and representation of on-line contingency estimation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain Behaviour and Cognitive Sciences, Quebec.
Shanks, D. R. (1985). Continuous monitoring of human contingency judgment across trials.Memory & Cognition,13, 158–167.
Symons, D. K., &Moran, G. (1994). Responsiveness and dependency are different aspects of social contingencies: An example from mother-infant smiles.Infant Behavior & Development,17, 209–214.
Wasserman, E. A. (1990). Detecting response-outcome relations: Toward an understanding of the causal texture of the environment.Psychology of Learning & Motivation,26, 27–82.
Watson, J. S. (1972). Smiling, cooing, and “The Game.”Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,18, 323–339.
Watson, J. S. (1979). Perception of contingency as a determinant of social responsiveness. In E. B. Thoman (Ed.)The origins of social responsiveness (pp. 33–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wortman, C. B. (1975). Some determinants of perceived control.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,31, 282–294.
Wright, J. C. (1962). Consistency and complexity of response sequences as a function of schedules of noncontingent reward.Journal of Experimental Psychology,63, 601–609.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Development of this program and preparation of this article were supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to P.J.M. and by Acadia University. We thank Bill Hayes for help with the final debugging. We gratefully acknowledge comments by Doug Symons on an earlier version of this manuscript and throughout the development of the program. Comments by Sarah Ransdell and other reviewers were also very helpful.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mcleod, P.J., Spence, A.B. Contiception: A program to study the effects of contingency parameters on judgments of control. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 27, 322–325 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200425
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200425