Abstract
Previous research showed that sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement of leverpressing generate different response rate asymptotes. To investigate the basis of this difference, the present study assessed the role of inhibitory after-effects and excitatory stimulus effects on measures of responding in rats exposed to fixed-interval schedules that randomly produced either sucrose or wheel-running reinforcers. Different discriminative stimuli were associated with each reinforcer type. Inhibitory aftereffects and excitatory stimulus effects were assessed by the pattern of postreinforcement pauses and local response rates across the four different combinations of previous and upcoming reinforcer types: wheel-wheel, wheel-sucrose, sucrose-wheel, and sucrose-sucrose. Results showed that, regardless of the prior type of reinforcer, response rates were higher and pauses were shorter in the presence of a stimulus signaling sucrose reinforcement. This suggests that differences in response rate asymptotes generated by these qualitatively different reinforcers may have more to do with differences in excitatory stimulus effects than with inhibitory after-effects.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Belke, T.W. (1998). Qualitatively different reinforcers and parameters of Herrnstein’s (1970) response-strength equation.Animal Learning & Behavior,26, 235–242.
Belke, T.W. (2000). Varying wheel-running reinforcer duration within a session: Effect on the revolution-postreinforcement pause relation.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,73, 225–239.
Bradshaw, C. M., Ruddle, H. V., &Szabadi, E. (1981). Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variableinterval schedules: II. Effect of the volume of sucrose reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,35, 263–269.
Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E., Ruddle, H. V., &Pears, E. (1983). Herrnstein’s equation: Effect of deprivation level on performance in variable-interval schedules.Behavior Analysis Letters,3, 267–273.
Conrad, D. G., &Sidman, M. (1956). Sucrose concentration as reinforcement for leverpressing by monkeys.Psychological Reports,2, 381–384.
Dallery, J., McDowell, J. J., &Lancaster, J. S. (2000). Falsification of matching theory’s account of single-alternative responding:k varies with sucrose concentration.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,73, 23–43.
de Villiers P., Ĥerrnstein, R. J. (1976). Toward a law of response strength.Psychological Bulletin,83, 1131–1153.
Guttman, N. (1954). Equal reinforcement values for sucrose and glucose solutions compared with equal-sweetness values.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,47, 358–361.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,13, 243–266.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1974). Formal properties of the matching law.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,21, 159–164.
Heyman, G. M., &Monaghan, M. M. (1987). Effects of changes in response requirement and deprivation on the parameters of the matching law equation: New data and review.Journal of Experimental Psycholzogy: Animal Behavior Processes,13, 384–394.
Heyman, G. M., &Monaghan, M. M. (1994). Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,61, 505–516.
Kraeling, D. (1961). Analysis of amount of reward as a variable in learning.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,54, 560–565.
McDowell, J. J., &Dallery, J. (1999). Falsification of matching theory: Changes in the asymptote of Herrnstein’s hyperbola as a function of water deprivation.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,72, 251–268.
McDowell, J. J., &Wood, H. M. (1984). Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: Changes in Herrnstein’sk as a function of changes in reinforcer magnitude.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,41, 183–192.
Perone, M., &Courtney, K. (1992). Fixed-ratio pausing: Joint effects of past reinforcer magnitude and stimuli correlated with upcoming magnitude.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,57, 33–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant 0GP0170022 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Belke, T.W. Differences in responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: Excitatory stimulus effects or inhibitory after-effects?. Animal Learning & Behavior 28, 332–343 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200267
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200267