Abstract
Based upon considerations raised by Soviet research, the role of relative stimulus intensity, or dominance, in the unconditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (US-US) paradigm was investigated under circumstances presumed favorable to the backward conditioned response (CR). Using the classically conditioned forelimb response of the cat, a brief shock (USD delivered to one forepaw preceded a shock (US2) to the opposite forepaw in paired conditioning fashion; subjects in the control group received explicitly unpaired presentations of the stimuli. Conditioning in both the forward and backward directions was evaluated by the appearance of contralateral CRs on test trials to each of the USs. In Experiment 1, a ratio of the intensities between US1 and US2 of 100:80 was used to create a relative dominance in favor of the backward CR. In addition, to evaluate the suggestion that the appearance of the backward CR is retarded in the Pavlovian paradigm, overtraining was provided to a forward conditioning criterion of 200%. In Experiment 2, the cats were exposed to successive reductions in the intensity of US2 to verify manipulations of dominance reportedly involved in the reactivation of a latent backward CR. Although forward conditioning was readily established to USl, there was no evidence of back-ward conditioning to US2 under any of the conditions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Asratyan, E. A. (1965).Compensatory adaptations, reflex activity, and the brain. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Asratyan, E. A. (1967). Some peculiarities in the formation, functioning, and inhibition of conditioned reflexes with two-way connections.Progress in Brain Research,22, 8–20.
Beritoff, J. S. (1965).Neural mechanisms of higher vertebrate behavior (W. T. Liberson, Trans.). Boston: Little, Brown.
Cautela, J. R. (1965). The problem of backward conditioning.Journal of Psychology,60, 135–144.
Champion, R. A., &Jones, J. E. (1961). Forward, backward and pseudoconditioning of the GSR.Journal of Experimental Psychology,62, 58–61.
Gormezano, I., &Tait, R. W. (1976). The Pavlovian analysis of instrumental conditioning.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science,11, 37–55.
Hall, J. F. (1976).Classical conditioning and instrumental learning: A contemporary approach. New York: Lippincott.
Hall, J. F. (1984). Backward conditioning in Pavlovian type studies.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science,19, 163–168.
Harlow, H. F. (1939). Forward conditioning, backward conditioning, and pseudoconditioning in the goldfish.Journal of Genetic Psychology,55, 49–58.
Heth, C. D. (1976). Simultaneous and backward fear conditioning as a function of number of CS-UCS pairings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 117–129.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1974).The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic Press.
Mahoney, W. J., &Ayres, J. J. B. (1976). One-trial simultaneous and backward fear conditioning as reflected in conditioned suppression of licking in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,4, 357–362.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927).Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
Razram, G. (1956). Backward conditioningPsychological Bulletin,63, 55–69.
Razran, G. (1957). The dominance-contiguity theory of acquisition of classical conditioning.Psychological Bulletin,54, 1–46.
Sheafor, P. J. (1975). Pseudoconditioned jaw movements of the rabbit reflect associations to contextual background cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,104, 245–260.
Spetch, M. L., Wilkie, D. M., &Pinel, J. P. J. (1981). Backward conditioning: A reevaluation of the empirical evidence.Psychological Bulletin,89, 163–175.
Spooner, A., &Kellogg, W. N. (1947) The backward conditioning curve.American Journal of Psychology,60, 321–334.
Stephens, J. M. (1934). The conditioned reflex as the explanation of habit formation: I. The essential factors in the establishment of the conditioned reflex.Journal of General Psychology,10, 110–135.
Switzer, S. A. (1930). Backward conditioning of the lid reflexJournal of Experimental Psychology,13, 76–97.
Trapold, M. A., Homzie, M., &Rutledge, E. (1964). Backward conditioning and the UCR latencyJournal of Experimental Psychology,67, 387–391.
Wagner, A. R., &Terry, W. S. (1975). Backward conditioning to a CS following an expected vs. a surprising UCSAnimal Learning & Behavior,3, 370–374.
Wendt, G. R. (1930). Analytical study of the conditioned knee jerk.Archives of Psychology,18, No. 123.
Wickens, D. D. (1973). Classical conditioning as it contributes to some basic psychological processes. In F. J. McGuigan & D. B. Lumsden (Eds.),Contemporary approaches to conditioning and learning. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston.
Wickens, D. D., Meyer, P. M., &Sullivan, S. N. (1961). Classical CSR conditioning, conditioned discrimination, and interstimulus interval in cats.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,54, 572–576.
Wickens, D. D., Nield, A. F., Tuber, D. S., &Wickens, C. D. (1969) Strength, latency, and form of conditioned skeletal and autonomic responses as functions of CS-UCS intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 165–170.
Wickens, D. D., Tuber, D. S., Nield, A. F., &Wickens, C. D. (1977). Memory for the conditioned response: The effects of potential interference introduced before and after original conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology. General,106, 47–70.
Wolfle, H. M. (1932). Conditioning as a function of the interval between the conditioned and original stimulus.Journal of General Psychology,7, 80–103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This report is dedicated to the late Carol Dow Wickens.
This research, undertaken in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree (1979) at The Ohio State University, was supported by NIMH Grant No. MH-08423 awarded to Delos D. Wickens.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tuber, D.S. Dominance, the bidirectional hypothesis, and Pavlovian backward conditioning in the US-US paradigm. Animal Learning & Behavior 14, 421–426 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200089
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200089