Abstract
As a test of differential processing of identity and conditional relations, subjects were first highly trained on 0-sec delay identity matching (IM) and conditional (“symbolic”) matching (CM), with the same pair of stimuli serving as samples in both tasks. CM probe trials were then randomly interspersed among baseline IM trials and vice versa. The differences in response latencies obtained on the probe and baseline trials provided the critical data. It was argued that differential processing of identity and conditional relations should result in a larger difference in response latency when CM probes were interspersed among IM baseline trials than when the reverse assignment was made. This pattern was found in cebus monkeys but not in pigeons. The results provide further evidence for the matching concept in monkeys, and they support the view that the matching concept is at best only weakly represented in pigeons.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Carter, D. E., &Werner, T. J. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,29, 565–601.
D’Amato, M. R., &Colombo, M. (1985). Auditory matching-to-sample in monkeys (Cebus apella).Animal Learning & Behavior,13, 375–382.
D’Amato, M. R., &Salmon, D. P. (1984). Cognitive processes in cebus monkeys. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 149–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
D’Amato, M. R., Salmon, D. P., &Colombo, M. (1985). Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 35–51.
D’Amato, M. R., Salmon, D. P., Loukas, E., &Tomie, A. (1985). Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livid).Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,44, 35–47.
D’Amato, M. R., &Worsham, R. W. (1974). Retrieval cues and short-term memory in capuchin monkeys.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology,86, 274–282.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Riddles of natural categorization.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,B308, 129–144.
Holmes, P. W. (1979). Transfer of matching performance in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,31, 103–114.
Honig, W. K., &Thompson, R. K. R. (1982). Retrospective and prospective processing in animal working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 16, pp. 239–283). New York: Academic Press.
Kirk, R. E. (1968).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Milner, A. D. (1973). Matching within and between sense modalities in the monkey (Macaca mulatto).Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,83, 278–284.
Morgan, C. L. (1977).An introduction to comparative psychology. Washington, DC: University Publications of America. (Original work published 1894).
Premack, D. (1978). On the abstractness of human concepts: Why it would be difficult to talk to a pigeon. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp. 423–151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Premack, D. (1983). The codes of man and beasts.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,6, 125–137.
Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wilson, B., Mackintosh, N. J., &Boakes, R. A. (1985a). Matching and oddity learning in the pigeon: Transfer effects and the absence of relational learning.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37B, 295–311.
Wilson, B., Mackintosh, N. J., &Boakes, R. A. (1985b). Transfer of relational rules in matching and oddity learning by pigeons and corvids.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37B, 313–332.
Zerbolio, D. J., Jr. (1985). Categorical color coding in goldfish.Animal Learning & Behavior,13, 269–273.
Zerbolio, D. J., Jr., &Royalty, J. L. (1983). Matching and oddity conditional discrimination in the goldfish as avoidance responses: Evidence for conceptual avoidance learning.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 341–348.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grants No. 8207146 and 8417383 to M. R. D’Amato. Preliminary data from Experiment 1 were described by D’Amato and Salmon (1984). who were responsible for the primate work The pigeon research was the responsibility of E. Loukas and A. Tomie.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D’Amato, M.R., Salmon, D.P., Loukas, E. et al. Processing of identity and conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livid). Animal Learning & Behavior 14, 365–373 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200080
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200080