Abstract
Three budgerigars were trained with operant techniques to discriminate examples of species-specific contact calls. Once the birds learned the discrimination among a large set of calls, they were tested with the calls altered in various ways. The birds’ performance on altered calls was compared with performance on normal calls. Results show that the birds could tolerate large spectral and temporal alterations in the calls with little or no decrement in performance. A comparison of the birds’ performance across conditions shows clear evidence of a redundancy in information contained in the calls. The birds were equally adept at discriminating among the calls when given only high-frequency information and when given only low-frequency information. The birds also performed just as well when presented with only the short beginning portions of the calls as they did when presented with somewhat longer portions near the end of the calls. This ability of budgerigars to discriminate among species-specific vocal signals that are highly distorted is reminiscent of the ability of humans to discriminate and recognize highly distorted speech sounds.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Becker, P. H. (1982). The coding of species-specific characteristics in bird sounds. In D. Kroodsma & E. Miller (Eds.),Acoustic communication in birds (Vol. 1; pp. 214–252). New York: Academic Press.
Dooling, R. J. (1986). Perception of vocal signals by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).Experimental Biology. Environmental & Sensory Aspects,45, 195–218.
Dooling, R. J., &Saunders, J. C. (1975). Hearing in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus): Absolute thresholds, critical ratios, frequency difference limens, and vocalizations.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,88, 1–20.
Dooling, R. J., &Searcy, M. H. (1985). Nonsimultaneous auditory masking in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).Journal of Comparative Psychology,99, 226–230.
Falls, J. B. (1982). Individual recognition by birds. In D. Kroodsma & E. Miller (Eds.),Acoustic communication in birds (Vol. 1, pp. 237–278). New York: Academic Press.
French, N. R. &Steinberg, J. C. (1947). Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,19, 90–119.
Gerhardt, C. H. (1986). Sound pattern recognition in treefrogs.Experimental Biology: Environmental & Sensory Aspects,45, 167–178.
Hulse, S. H., & Cynx, J. (in press). Interval and contour in serial pitch perception by a passerine bird, the European starling (Stumis vulgaris).Journal of Comparative Psychology.
Kroodsma, D., &Miller, E. (1982).Acoustic communication in birds. New York. Academic Press.
Lisker, L., &Abramson, A. S. (1970). The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. InProceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Prague, 1967 (pp. 563–567). Prague: Academia.
Marler, P. (1970). A comparative approach to vocal learning: Song development in white-crowned sparrows.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,71, 1–25.
Miller, G. A. (1981).Language and speech. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Park, T. J. &Dooling, R. J. (1985). Perception of species-specific contact calls by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).Journal of Comparutne Psychology,99, 391–402.
Park, T. J., Okanoya, K. &Dooling, R. (1985). Operant conditioning of small birds for acoustic discrimination.Journal of Ethology (Japan),3, 5–9.
Peters, S., Searcy, W. A., &Marler, P. (1980). Species song discrimination in choice experiments with territorial male swamp and song sparrows.Animal Behaviour,28, 393–404.
Saunders, J. C., Rintelmann, W. F., &Bock, G. R. (1979). Frequency selectivity in bird and man: A comparison among critical ratios, critical bands, and psychophysical tuning curves.Hearing Research,1, 303–323.
Sinnott, J. M. (1980). Species-specific coding in birdsong.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,68, 862–884.
Soli, S. D. (1983). The role of spectral cues in the discrimination of voice onset time differences.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,73, 2150–2165.
Watson, C. S., &Kelly, W. J. (1981). The role of stimulus uncertainty in the discrimination of auditory patterns. In D. J. Getty & J. H. Howard (Eds.),Auditory and visual pattern recognition (pp. 37–59). Cambridge, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zoloth, S. R., Petersen, M. R., Beecher, M. D., Green, S., Marler, P., Moody, D. B., &Stebbins, W. (1979). Species-specific perceptual processing of vocal sounds by monkeys.Science,204, 870–873.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
These experiments were supported by Public Health Service Grant NS-19006 and Research Career Development Award HD-00512 to R. Dooling.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, T.J., Dooling, R.J. Perception of degraded vocalizations by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Animal Learning & Behavior 14, 359–364 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200079
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200079